Dishonesty In Yann Martel's Life Of Pi

After two unsuccessful books, the narrator is hungry for positive feedback. He has learned that his books do not contain a spark; therefore, this might influence him to twist the truth and add in fake ideas that contribute to the liveliness of a story. This dishonesty is morally wrong; however, it will provide the narrator with success and money. These lines detract from the narrative voice’s credibility because the narrator’s “hunger” proves that he will do anything for a bestseller. The story of Pi had a good outline and structure, but the narrator is looking for a component that will bring life to his books. If the narrator was unable to find the life within the story, he would undoubtedly add it in and call it a fact to satisfy his need …show more content…
Because this line explains such a sensitive topic, readers can forget that they are not hearing this story directly from Pi. The narrator explains the details of Pi’s life in a very personal way, which makes it seem like Pi is writing the story for the world to discover. These lines enhance the narrative voice’s credibility because the specific details of Pi’s life contribute to the truth of the story. After the author’s note, the story is introduced by the narrator who is writing through Pi’s point of view. It is easy to forget that the author is truly the voice in the narrative; therefore, the story seems more believable. The story’s credibility increases because it seems like the person who witnessed the events is telling the story. The narrator seems determined to find the main character, even though he already knows the basis of the story. The narrator learned about the story’s outline from Mr. Adirubasamy; therefore, he has enough information to use the plot and add his own filler. These lines enhance the narrative voice’s credibility because they show that the narrator is eager to learn about the story’s details. Pi would have been the only individual who could describe the feelings and thoughts that were present in the story; therefore, the narrator put in the effort to track him down. The narrator’s action shows commitment and a willingness to capture the truth of the …show more content…
The narrator went beyond the simple task of listening to Pi verbally tell his story by viewing and reading newspaper articles and diary entries. The narrator demonstrates commitment through this action. The narrator also took notes throughout the entire process to ensure that he remembered all of the details of the story. These lines enhance the narrative voice’s credibility because they prove that the narrator was determined to understand every detail within Pi’s story. The narrator took notes on both Pi’s verbal telling of the story and the written literary works from Pi and other writers. Because of his extensive array of knowledge and newly formed connection to Pi’s story, the narrator is likely to include all of the facts and maintain