Disbelief In Law Enforcement Essay

Improved Essays
Police officers in gun searches face disbelief in courts simply because judges do not believe them or their stories. This is an important issue because this has to do with both our court system and our law enforcement officers, which should be working together to enforce laws and provide justice to individuals that were wronged. For a judge to have this type of problem of disbelief in a court room from a police officer that is truly an ethical issue that should be fixed. I believe that police officers face disbelief because some police officers abuse the authority and power given to them by the state.
Police officers play a major role in society both crime fighters and public servants. They protect the people and the community while they fight
…show more content…
According to the fourth amendment of the U.S constitution, police officers may conduct “reasonable” searches and seizures in order to look for illegal items, stolen property and evidence of crimes. Stop and frisk is used when an officer has reasonable suspicion on an individual, there are two parts to stop and frisk which is the stop and the frisk. For the stop there are two requirements that must be met in order to satisfy the guidelines for a valid stop. For this to occur the police officer must observe unusual conduct that leads him/her to conclude of his/her experience. While conducting a stop an officer must observe then approach that person and identify his/herself and after they can ask questions. Now the frisk is basically the pat down, this is used for the officers own protection and the protection of others in that area. The officer may conduct a carefully limited frisk for the outer clothing of that individual in an attempt to discover weapons that might be used to assault him/her. While conducting a frisk the officer must conduct the pat down, if there is a weapon they will confiscate it and arrest the suspect and finally conduct a full body search after the arrest. This proves to show that gun searches are essential to police officers as they provide reassurance to the officer that the person is not a threat to the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Achman Case Study

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I, Supreme Court Justice, Floyd McLeod, find in favor of Mohammed Achman. This case has proved to me that Mr. Achman 's rights as an U.S. citizen were violated multiple times. To go more in depth; on September 27, 2001, approximately two weeks after the terrorist attack of the World Trade Center, America, especially New York ,were on edge in finding any little details to get to the bottom of the attack and any future attacks. Unfortunately, the Achman 's felt the wrath and discrimination from American civilians. It all started with people breaking one of his windows to his store and destroying his mosque in queens.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The role of the police officer as a member of the community is important, as they must adapt to a variety of situations. Their job is to maintain the balance between law and order, protect members of the public and their property, prevent crime, reduce the fear of crime and improve the quality of life for all citizens. Police use a numerous amount of tools to protect individuals, pinpoint the perpetrators of crime and ensure successful prosecutions against those who break the law. Modern policing varies from the textbook definition of the job and the reality officers face everyday. How police do things in the real world differs from what is put down on paper.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop And Frisk Case Study

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Officers only need a reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing. The term “Stop and Frisk” is a technique which is utilized by police officials for the reduction of crime through stopping and searching the individual(s) they suspect of committing a crime or in possession of illegal weapons or drugs. This policy has been under a constant debate based on the facts that it promotes racial profiling, that stops can be considered illegal, and this policy invades the privacy of all individuals.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The NYPD implementation of its Stop, Question, and Frisk program under Mayor Bloomberg and the NYPD Commissioner Kelly has been a heavy controversial subject for decades (Garrison, 2014). Stop-and-Frisk has also been a contentious law enforcement practice since it was first approved by the Supreme Court (Rudovsky and Rosenthal, 2013). Terry Vs. Ohio established the Stop-and-Frisk act in 1968, concluding that the law enforcement had the right to stop citizens under reasonable suspicion that they have committed, committing or going to commit a crime. It was also concluded that if the law enforcement suspected citizens to be armed and/or dangerous, they could conduct a “frisk” or a pat down to citizens outer clothing in search for weapons.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction Secrecy is a common factor in the government, they will always hide something from society. It could be to protect us or just to avoid something even bigger. A police officer role is to “serve and protect the community” by enforcing the law in a safe way to those that break it. Every citizen have the right to be treated fairly in this country. Police officers are supposed to help the community follow the law, by making sure that everything is in order and no one is acting illegal.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop and Frisk states that police is able to stop and search someone based on a suspicion that this person is involved in criminal activity. The 4th amendment states that police is allowed to search someone if they have the reasonable believe that this person is committing, has committed or is going to commit a crime. This search consists of a quick pat down of the outer clothing. Stop and Frisk started with the Terry vs. Ohio case, in 1976, in which a police officer suspected three men of being about to commit a crime. The officer pointed his gun at them in order to search them.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop And Frisk Essay

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stop-and-Frisk Policy Review According to the Washington Post article “Here’s what you need to know about stop and frisk — and why the courts shut it down” by Dylan Matthews, Stop and Frisk is “an NYPD policy wherein police will detain and question pedestrians, and potentially search them, if they have a reasonable suspicion that the pedestrian in question committed, is committing, or is about to commit a felony or a Penal Law misdemeanor” (Matthews). This means that if a person appears suspicious of having commit or being about to commit a crime according to a police officer then that police officer has the right to question, search and detain this particular individual. This seems like something that would benefit society, preventing crime and ridding society of wrongdoers. However, there are serious issues with this policy.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop And Frisk Analysis

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The implementation tactics of the stop and frisk policy is racially discriminatory because the number of members of the minority group stopped by a police exceeded the number of whites. Racially discriminatory enforcement of the stop and frisk policy is also a risk factor for the well-being of the society as it promotes prejudice against a certain group of individuals within the criminal justice system. As Gelam et al. (2007) raised the issue of geographic heterogeneity that was found in their analysis of stop-and-frisk. They questioned the legitimacy of the criteria the police used for determination before a stop that caused unjustified disparate impact among the racial demographic of the stop-and-frisk.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is just a form of racial profiling because over half the percent of people they stop are African Americans. We are suspected to have some form of a weapon on contraband, or us and if it just happened that someone they stopped and frisked did they would get charged. In these cases whites never seem to cause suspicious among cops. It is easier for police to just be able to go into urban areas and criminalize the people there because it is cheaper for their police force than to go into suburban areas where there can be drugs or contraband inside of there houses and having to look into many of the crimes police would need a search warrant because the crimes in these areas are typically done behind closed doors. Because we look suspicious to a specific police officer they take this as an advantage and use this as a style of policing it gives them to right to just stop and search me as If I was a criminal.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop And Frisk Analysis

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stop and frisk is an unjust crime prevention that gives permission to provided police officers to stop a person and frisk them based on “reasonable suspicions” of possible criminal activities. Although nowadays it seems to be a way for police officers to harass people on the street specifically minorities. From this program, minorities experienced police interrogations, physical assault, and even arrests, only to establish innocence in court. Despite being declared unconstitutional in 2013, there’s an ongoing discussion in the news to bring it back and not just in New York but in other major cities as well. Stop and frisk is a prejudiced program that should not be reinstituted in America.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The only reason why people are against “stop and frisk” is because the people believe that it’s unconstitutional. They think that “stop and frisk” is an invasion of privacy, which could be true, but the Second Court of Appeals decision said that stop and frisk is constitutional and plays a critical role in saving lives…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not all cops are bad Police Officers: Courageous, strong, brave, amazing people, but to some they are all brutal, evil, horrible people. Not since the 1960s have police been subjected to so much criticism, disaffection, and public abuse (Moore). Yet, not all cops are bad people like people tend to think. A good majority of police are honest, caring, loving people that love their job, protecting us and their city from harm.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Regulatory Law

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As of the 21st century, regulatory laws have impacted our daily activities and lives. Regulatory laws are regulations that set out certain requirements on what is legal or illegal. The Impact of Regulatory Law on American Criminal Justice- Are there too many laws? by Vincent Del Castillo provides an overview of the results of having regulatory laws. While the book talks about a variety of topics, we will mainly focus on illegal drugs, guns, the police, and also the societal consequences.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why I want a Career in Law Enforcement I value the officers that serve and protect the community and it has always been my desire to have a career in the law enforcement profession. As a child, I remember a local police officer that came to my elementary school. His name was Officer Howey. Every year he would discuss a variety of topics, from staying away from strangers to the dangers associated with drugs. I always felt that I was safe and could approach him with any questions or concerns I had.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Stop and frisk tactics have been used to preserve public safety and officer well-being. A stop and frisk is a non-intrusive police stop and pat-down based on the reasonable suspicion in relation to a crime that has happened, will happen, or is in the process of being carried out (Cornell Law School, 2017). Stop and frisk situations are highly common and the reported instances have increased by approximately 7% annually (Hovhannisyan, 2006). However, the approach is highly controversial because it operates primarily on officers' perceptions and opinions, which opens the door to personal prejudices dictating the usage. This executive summary includes the advantages and disadvantages involved in stop and frisk procedures as well as the constitutionality and recommendations to improve the approach.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays