Disaster of Bhopal: Analysis on the Ethical Models Essay

767 Words 4 Pages
Disaster of Bhopal: Analysis on the Ethical Models

December 3rd of 1984, Bhopal Disaster caused the chemical plant to blow and killing thousands of Indians people in the area near the plant. It was a true tragedy for the people of Bhopal because the situation was very intense at the night of the chemical explosion. It was reported that the natives of Bhopal felt like inhaling chili pepper and they were defecating and urinating in their clothes because the chemicals made them unconscious. As a result, many people got lungs and throats infection. In addition, lots of people got blindness, cancer and tuberculosis. There was mental retardation in ninety percent of the children born from parents who were affected by Bhopal disaster.
…show more content…
Warren Anderson, the spokesperson from Dow Chemicals was detained for doing this when he came to see the plant. Soon, agreeing to a bail bond that he will come to the jury to represent the union bailed him. Neither Warren Anderson nor the Union Carbide presented for trial and the Bhopal District declared them fugitives from justice. There is a demonstration of an ethical issue in behalf of the union of the Dow Chemicals. Just because Mr. Anderson was based in the USA, he didn’t act ethically by not showing up to the jury.

The other serious ethical issue we see in the scenario is that the Dow Chemical didn’t take full responsibility that they should have taken. The company was sued for 4 billion dollars but they settled for a portion of it. The victims were given $400 dollars per person. This demonstrated the lack of responsibility of Dow Chemical because it hardly covers just the medical cost for 4 years. Most of the victims lost the capacity of working a job and the children they made were born with some kind of physical or mental retardation.

The terms are clear in term of us analyzing the situation but it is an irony to find out how it took them so long to make an ethical decision to take the responsibility of negligence of the safety. The model of Utilitarian and Egoism is applied in the scenario because the Union Carbide plant didn’t care about taking the recommendation by safety engineer and made an attempt to solve the problem. Most of the safety machines

Related Documents