Benefits Of Animal Testing Essay

Improved Essays
Many companies today use animals as testing subjects especially in the beauty industry. Yet, nothing is stopping these companies from hurting and/or killing defenseless animals just for the sake of research. Not only does it cause torture and pain to these animals, but it also affects them mentally. Using animals as testing subjects is just like a cord of rope; yes, if tied around the hands loosely enough, the rope will not damage much, but the tighter the rope becomes, the more pain and suffering the individual receives. Many individuals believe using humans as testing subjects is dreadful and appalling. However, when it comes to animals, it can completely fly past their heads. It is absolutely horrendous to use animals as experiments just …show more content…
Some claim it is better to use animals as testing subjects rather than humans. However, that is one of the main areas that they are misguided in. While yes, it is good if humans can stop others from being used as test subjects, using animals as testing subjects does not help humans. Instead, there is another possibility that helps both humans and animals, and none of them have to receive pain. Despite that, since using other methods of testing can be a little more complex, many companies do not want to execute it, sticking to the old fashioned way. And while this is one major problem companies do not want to admit to, some people may also claim testing on animals is alright because the Animal Welfare Act stops mistreatment towards animals. Again, this is false. The AWA only protects about five percent of the animals tested on since most animals tested on are rats, mice, fish, and other small animals. The AWA does not protect the animals listed before, which is atrocious and unlawful. And lastly, some may argue even animals benefit from the use of animal testing. Since the vaccines have been tested on before from other animals, it has stopped rabies, distemper, tetanus, and more from affecting animals. However, the amount of animals killed/tortured has a much greater number than the amount saved. So, the statement that is claimed before could not possibly be true if more animals are being killed than saved.
To finish, animal testing is cruel and unreasonable. There are many other ways to stop the cruelty from spreading, yet not many people are willing to take the chance to stop it. Not much protection is put towards these animals. Stopping America from making animals distressful, locked up, and treated unfairly could make the country a much better place for humans and

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This shows that getting research from animals for humans is not always approved by the human body, even if scientists say that animals have the same traits as humans. Animals are getting harmed as they are being tested on for research and it is very cruel because the outcome of the animal is dying and by the treatment that may not work on humans it is not worth it for the animals. As a matter of fact, Animal experimentation does not need to happen there is other alternatives that can replace…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A drug tested on animals to prove if it’s safe for humans is a very risky move because all drugs affect various species differently. Lastly, do we have the right to test on these creatures? ”There is no doubt that animals experience a life… Like us, animals can feel pain and fear, but also excitement and satisfaction” (Cothran 29). Animals feel much more pain that what we think and have a life that they should be allowed to live without the intrusion of humans. Animal experimentation, one of the many injustices we still have, should be a thing of the…

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, the act of using them as test subjects is not justifiable by any means, especially because humans and animals do not have similar bodies, and some diseases such as HIV-AIDS do not attack animals. Hence, testing for such diseases’ drugs on animals may not offer conclusive results. Moreover, use of animal tests greatly infringes animal rights, because just like humans, animals also have their rights. Additionally, such tests greatly inflict a lot of pain and suffering to these animals, because some of the tests run on them are quite painful and in most cases deadly. Therefore, animals should be treated with consideration and care and not as test…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many alternative methods for testing these products that would not harm animals. It is also said that the test results are irrelevant because animals are not the same as humans, thus not getting accurate results. The tests may mislead researchers into thinking certain drugs are safe to be used on humans, or could miss potential cures and treatments. Animal testing is more expensive than testing on alternative things, so to many, they could think of it as being a waste of government money that could be going to things needed much more. Much of the testing done on animals has flaws in the experiment so it ends up wasting the life of the animal.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is Animal Testing Wrong

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Most people would agree that harming an animal is a cruel act to commit. Others believe that animal testing should be allowed because new human and animal related cures have been discovered by conducting the experiments. Some may think that since we are humans and animals are not, we have higher authority over the animals. Some people have protested, started movements and other organizations to try and stop animal experimenting. These innocent creatures are being tortured daily so we must step in and put an end to these disgraceful animal experimentations.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The suffering, pain and death that animals are subject to during scientific research isn’t worth the benefits. The information gathered from an animal experiment would not result in the same outcome if it was performed on a human. There are too many variables, such as age, weight, gender that would essentially render the information invalid (Greek 56). Scientist know this however these experiments are completed. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the Federal Drug Administration are some of the few agencies that are wasting animal’s lives by conducting experiments on them.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For most people there are two scenarios that come to mind when they hear animal testing. The first scenario is that scientist are torturing, neglecting and abusing the animals that are being tested on. The other scenario is that scientist are being ethical, take care of the animals and are creating life-saving medicines. This makes the use of animals in experiments a controversial topic; a topic that isn’t quite black and white when argued. There are different types of animal testing like, medical testing and cosmetic testing; one is more ethical than the other.…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the author mentioned, by looking at characteristics that all humans and animals possess would change this kind of thinking. From this point of view, people would see other species as equals. However, philosophers often do not acknowledge this kind of thinking by discerning differences such as rationality and morality between humans and other animal species. If we would start killing other humans for pleasure like we kill animals, it would completely immoral, but that does not appear to be the case when it comes to animals, even though it should, because philosophers cannot accept that humans and other animal species can be or should be…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reaction of the humans to the drugs that are used for the animal experiment can differ from the reaction of the animals, which means that animals fail to be used as a method of developing the technique of humans' medical treatment. Moreover, there are numerous alternative methods which are proved to be more efficient than animal experimentation. Therefore, humans cannot use animals arbitrarily and try to minimize the use of animal for their own benefits. Now, it is the time for people to respect animals’ rights and find other ways instead of doing animal experimentation. People should not be selfish anymore and treat animals with…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Is Wrong

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The cellular, metabolic, and anatomic systems of animals are really different from humans so the fact that they would be considered as good test subjects is really bad (ProCon). It is very unacceptable to experiment on animals because, “animals suffer like humans do, so it is speciesism to experiment on them while we refrain from experimenting on humans” (ProCon). Meaning that human superiority leads to the exploitation of animals. Animal testing does not always work, because it is known that some medical breakthroughs with animal research can and could have been made without the use of animals (ProCon). Knowing that animals can have serious harm done to themselves during animal testing is horrible and changes the entire…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays