Advantages Of Majority Government

Superior Essays
The three government systems majority, coalition and minority all have their own limitations and benefits. A majority system is a single party where only one member is elected out of a constituency; [a specified area of voters who elect a person to represent them legislatively] the most adequate person should be elected to represent the constituency. This system is very common and they can do what they want to. It is easier to pass bills and do not have to worry about the opposition. The minority system consist of many different parties where that one party does not have more than 50% of the power. It is not as common as the majority system. They have to work with other parties to pass bills so it is not as easy as the majority. Finally, a …show more content…
Minority parties are extremely responsive to the nation’s views and with many parties being in charge, they are more able to represent people’s point of views and what they would like to be changed in the country. Passing bills is definitely a slower process but also, a more effective and efficient process. It is a slower policy making process because this system cannot go ahead based on their own views but are forced to take other opinions from the other parties into account. When deciding on a new policy, there is a lot of parties to show their point of view and all come from different parts of the country so this results in the policy making more representative and has a lot less discrimination. On the other hand, timing for urgent matters is a bit of a downfall as the government parties have to engage in long discussions and debates on the matter which takes up an enormous amount of time. This type of government can cause policy paralysis as there are so many parties with different views and can stop the making of new policies. Usually, minority governments tend to last for only a short period of time which unfortunately sometimes can lead to political parties not being able to fully pursue their desired policies and leaves some work unfinished. Another limitation to the minority government is where to put the …show more content…
I believe this is the best because it has the most benefits to it in regards to fairness and non-biased. The parties get to discuss thoroughly together the bills and with more people in rule in the government, they can weigh out the pros and cons more efficiently and propose any amendments that might be of the people’s interest.
In conclusion, majority, minority and coalition governments all have their benefits and limitations in regards to the policy making process. As discussed above, each type of government system suits different countries. Personally, I do not think that single party governments are very representative for the country but of course, it does have its advantages. Furthermore, I do conceive that the more parties the government have the better as long as it is not too

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This is accomplished because a higher number of elected representatives guard against the attempts of the few, so the factions won't become the majority and the government won't disintegrate whenever there is a dispute. Having a government that could withstand factions that commonly work against public interest and infringe on the rights of others is how to make a country stand the test of time. But is this true? Our two party system is a faction within itself. I feel as if James Madison would not be approving of the two party system, since it seems like it is typically just two very different sides constantly disagreeing with one another.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, while many Republicans disagree on Obama’s new health law, the Democrats represent a vast majority of people who had no health insurance. In addition, unlike the Democrats, the Republicans are hesitant to raise minimum wage because they do not represent low-income workers and families living in poverty. Nonetheless, having a divided government can benefit the democracy of the United States. The House majority by Republicans can prevent the Democratic president from going extremely “left”. The term “Tyranny of the Majority” can be used to describe our democracy if the country had both the President and the House from the same party.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    O'Sullivan's First Law explains this to a fair degree since the denizens of a certain party will - over time - want to keep the bureaucratic levers of power with the false idea that they can have it run more efficiently. Besides the simple expedient of term limits, a new party could start anew with a mandate to avoid this political…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gerrymanding Advantages

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Canada the Single Member Plurality electoral system is used when voting during elections. Politics, Power and the Common Good by Mintz, Close and Croci define this system as “an electoral system in which voters in each electoral district elect a single representative to the legislature. The candidate with the most votes is elected, even if that candidate did not receive the majority of votes.” (Ch7, pg. 147) This is a system that is simple to administer and the candidate that gets the most votes than the others is declared the winner.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Majority factions, on the other hand, are more dangerous – they have already gained control of a majority of people and thus can more easily abuse power for their own self-interest. Minority factions, such as a group fighting for a local issue, are unlikely to succeed in Congress. These groups lack the backing necessary to pass a piece of legislation. Consider the Republican party of today, though; it is, in essence, a majority faction in Congress. Therefore, the House and Senate can theoretically pass laws in the interests of the Republican party.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Partisanship Polarization

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages

    However, Will McLennan (2011) suggests that a divided government is more beneficial than a one party controlled government. “The most common criticism leveled against divided government is that it produces gridlock” (McLennan, 2011, p. 162). As per political scientist David Mayhew “the passage rate of ‘significant’ legislation during times of divided government is only marginally lower than that during periods of unified control” (as cited by McLennan, 2011, p. 162). Therefore, the idea of gridlock is a misunderstood result of partisan control of government. McLennan cites various successful legislative acts that have been passed during partisan governments.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Per Hudson, the solution to this problem is to have a political alternative. The parliamentary system is a combination of the executive and legislative branches with the prime minister as the leader of the majority party. With this option, Hudson lists a few items he considers to be relevant to a parliamentary system, such as a greater accountability of the candidates and the officials by their respective political parties, as compared to American politicians. An example Hudson cites occurred in 1990 when the Conservative Party asked Margaret Thatcher to resign because they feared her leadership would result in defeat for the party. While this, indeed, is a change usually not seen in America, some of the parliamentary system features will not fit our country.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think that it is a very inefficient way to run our government. At least in our Mock Congress, the Republicans voted for the Republican bills, and the Democrats voted for the Democratic bills. If you wanted a member from the other party to vote for you, you had to either trick them or bribe them, and that is not how our government should be ran. This was both an unnecessary obstacle and a frustration for me. I was surprised to see some members who voted for individual bills instead of just for their party, though.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Careerism In Congress

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Also the congress generally exercises its negative powers to keep the status quo rather than create new policies that possibly could benefit the collective good. Correspondingly, constituents of the minority party are less likely to see policy they agree with and because voters can only vote for a change of the congress members, but not a change in the institution a cycle begins to form. This cycle benefits the majority party because the majority party constituents will most likely be satisfied because more legislation in their favor will be passed. Therefore, congress does not represent the nation as a whole under strong party…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Major parties establish the foundation of the binary convention of the United States regarding many issues, whereas minor parties mainly focus on a single issue that differs from the major parties. The disadvantage of minor parties is their limited concern with the issues that revolve around citizens, while major parties tend to offer a broad spectrum of issues that reflect in their party platform. Major parties’ coalitions of interest in the elections give them more influence in the government. Essentially, the differences between minor and major parties is their influences in the federal government and party platforms.…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reaching a compromise is important so that all factions have their ideals implemented. Although this often results in a status quo bias, it impedes majority and minority tyranny from developing. Government promotes compromise between the majority and minority groups. The problem of factions is solved by forcing factions to compete with each other. Fragmented democratic institutions are set­up to allow federal laws to be passed.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, it is a decentralized structure of government, meaning that many hands or groups of hands have a grasp at the power around them. When it comes to decision making, majoritarian allows all of its people to help in the decision making where as in pluralistic citizens can go up in front of certain leaders of the groups and be heard by them where the leaders would consider or not consider the citizen’s arguments. One of the few similarities that these two democracy have is…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral System Analysis

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The electoral and party systems have important implications in the Canadian political system, but their impact runs deeper than simply forming a new parliament every time an election takes place. The relationship the systems share has political and social impacts. Author Alan C. Cairns discusses the functions of the two systems and the effects they have on the electorate in his article “The Electoral System and the Party System in Canada, 1921-1965*.” The electoral system used in Canada is Single Member Plurality (SMP,) which is designed in such a way that the outcome of any election is explicit.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are two different systems of a democratic government, parliamentary and presidential, which are seen in multiple countries across the world. World powers such as the Canada and the United Kingdom thrive with their parliamentary system while the United States of America has shown stability and power with their presidential system. While both parliamentary and presidential systems have benefits and drawbacks, parliamentary systems are evidently more democratic because it gives majority of its power to the people by allowing them to call for a vote of no confidence and not setting maximum limits to prime minister term periods. This paper will compare and contrast the two democratic systems, discuss the benefits and critiques of each and finally examine why…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Importance Of Democracy Essay

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited

    It is a generally accepted fact that the people love the soil they are born on. However, in oppressed dictatorships and tyranny rules , the people who once had faith in their homeland may become emotionally depressed and start cursing their fate of being born in that particular country. Thus, these forms of governments can greatly have an adverse effect on one’s devotion to his birthplace which gives way to little or no patriotism. On the other hand, in a democratic form of government, everyone has their say in the leadership and they have access to human rights. Thus, this equity in the society together with the love of homeland creates such patriotism that is not apparent in any other forms of government.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited
    Superior Essays