Symbolic Violence And Al-Qaeda

Improved Essays
Al-Qaeda used direct and symbolic violence to create the reaction that they wanted in the American people from their 9/11 attack. Direct violence is used to physically eliminate parts of the opposition and to destroy resources used by the institution. This type of violence does not regard the symbolic results of their violence, but when paired with symbolic violence it can be very dangerous. Symbolic violence is staged for a movement, in this case Al-Qaeda, to gain attention. They directed their action at the American people and government. This is intentional and reflects the results they wanted to find from the American people.
Al-Qaeda wanted to inspire fear and anxiety by their attacks. For example, after 9/11 many Americans were fearful
…show more content…
This is part of symbolic violence, and it is mostly seen in the aftermath of 9/11. It made people ask questions of the government that had not been asked before and created a large historical event for people to use to question all motives. Symbolic violence is used to gain attention, and Al-Qaeda gained a huge amount of attention after the attack. Al-Qaeda used this attack to gain attention with the sympathizers, people who were potentially interested in this type of violence already could find an outlet with Al-Qaeda. The terrorist also intended to recruit sympathizers. This was also a type of symbolic violence because it caused people to gather and made neutral citizens recognize that they are not safe from attacks. Therefore, they should urge their leaders to rethink their policies that have caused this violent reaction from the terrorist. All of these are reasons for Al-Qaeda to attack the United States in this terrorist attack. They used direct and symbolic violence to create the reaction that they wanted in the American people from their 9/11 attack. The horrors committed against the American people were not justified by this attack, however and it is still a sobering reminder of the evils in the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    there has to be a super power behind, who is funding terrorist and paying them under the table to commence such acts against entire world, "to achieve its strategic objectives ". The author uses ample emotional appeals in the article to convince audience and define who are the terrorist in reality. "If someone kills or torture someone is called terrorist, but if someone else targets villages and countryside is not terrorist, but is called protector of human rights" (Afghan paper calls on USA to define what terrorism is, 2007, paragraph 6). The author pointing out USA presence in Afghanistan and Iraq in the name of war on terror. this has pro and cons as it demolish terrorist territories/ structure but at the same time it cause hundreds of innocents casualties in the country side.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    They condemn the actions of the terrorists, and they make it clear that the terrorists will not get away with severely harming the American people. Pitts’ and Barry’s righteous tone is expressed through their use of certain words and phrases. They clearly express ideas of retribution and justice; the American people will be better than the terrorists, but they will also rise up and fight against anyone who dares hurt their people. Their mournful, angry, and righteous tones reflect the feelings of the American people after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Pitts and Barry both used these tones to convey a similar idea: Americans will mourn and heal, and when they do, they will seek justice for not only those who had lost their lives, but for all…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Terrorists need an audience. Media needs a story; this is how media misinterpretations on terrorism is born. The media’s role is no longer to inform but rather to control how the viewers react to the information provided. Media’s influence on the public’s sudden focus from sports and celebrities to the collapse of the most globally important twin towers is an example of how media shapes viewers interest and concern. As David L. Altheide credits mass media in promoting fear evermore since the United States discovered international terrorism on 11th sept 2001.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Al Qaeda, a militant group of terrorist attackers who was founded by Osama bin Laden and popularly contribute by the Islamic extremist, had planned their corrupt attack against the United States and “There acts- crimes against humanity- were derived from a reasoned hatred, a distorted fundamentalism that transformed belief, intellect and compassion into a mutant, predatory ‘final solution ‘ politics (Scraton, 2).” This horrific act was guided by the feeling of hatred towards the U.S. system, the terrorist militants perspective enables them to commit this inhuman acts by believing that killing more people is a satisfaction and a respect for their beliefs in which identity is being manipulated, if an individual sees themselves though identity…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    All this to “purify” the world. He has changed the way people see terrorism. Military’s around the war run missions to try to stop them from doing the exact thing that Osama had…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Terrorists have a political motive to instill their ideas on the people who do not share their ideas. They are upset with the norms of society and wish to change those norms through violence. Constructivism would also argue terrorism is a social construct; “there is no universal and objective standard of what terrorism is and who [the] terrorist are (Nimmer)”. Those in the majority see terrorism as evil, however, those committing acts of terror do not see what they are doing as bad since it fits in their beliefs and preferences. The idea of terrorism is more subjective rather than objective - based on facts.…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bin Laden’s is partly a justification of the attacks and the war raging on, as well as a warning. Bin laden starts out saying that his country and people do not hate freedom, or security. They do not want to be under oppression or under control they want freedom, their own view of freedom not Americas. He talks about how America has laid waste to their country therefore they will lay waste to America. Then he goes on to talk about justification for the acts of terror they did because of what America has done.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Islamic and Muslim religion are dangerous to Americans, because they are against American culture. Therefore they will kill Americans. Before Hasan committed the massacre, he attended a religious ceremony that could off influence him on killing Americans. According to Researcher S. Harris, author of "Letter to a Christian Nation", contends that religion propagates myths that are dangerous, and that the world would be far better off without them"(“Terror: Can We Blame Religion?”). This show religion can influence many criminal all around the world like it did to Nadal…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the eyes of the organization, the only thing that will fix the injustices brought upon the is a public display of violence. Any act that has the following components may be labeled and terrorist attack: premeditation, political motivation, violence, and the act must have been committed against victims who did not warrant or provoke the attack (Schmallger. 2015. p 574). Because of the different motives for terrorist organizations, there are different types of terrorism.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brooklier then concludes, “In some ways, when we hear of a terrorist attack, we automatically think of Islamic people who hold the ideology of seeing America being in ruins (destroyed). However, American society doesn’t realize that these radicals (extremists) can come from any background or religion”(Brooklier). The word “automatically” implies that Americans make an impulsive judgement. They immediately start thinking that it is Islamic People that start these terrorist attacks without realizing that anybody can be a terrorist. This illustrates that when one can’t move on beyond a traumatic experience, their decisions can be compromised because we start assuming Muslims are terrorists in terrorist attacks through the…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays