Diocletian's Broken Roman Empire

Decent Essays
In the beginning of the fourth century, a new emperor by the name of Diocletian took power. Coming from a low status family, Diocletian rose through the ranks and became a strong military leader that began the restoration process of the broken Roman Empire. As a strong military leader, Diocletian saw the need for a new system that would restructure the empire and create peace in the broken empire.
The first order under Diocletian involved the splitting of the empire into two separate empires because he felt it was too large for one man to rule by himself. The split fell between the East, which was under his rule, and the West which fell under the rule of Maximian, a strong military commander. Within each empire an abundance of provinces were

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    *With ultimate power and control, he dominated the affairs of the Senate, the plebeian council and the powers of the censors, for instance, all the candidates for election of the legislative assemblies needed his approval, all bills submitted to the assemblies did not pass without his consent. This severely diminished the powers of the assemblies and deprived the senate of its authority. Moreover, to preserve his supreme image, he minimized the powers of the governors and passed a law which limited their term in office. Finally, around 42 to 43 B.C, he passed a new law which allowed him to appoint all the consuls, the tribunes and the magistrates. (make it…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout history, there have been many great leaders with very different styles of commanding. Some of these methods, while unorthodox, benefited the land’s people, the land’s economy, and people’s spirituality. In Rome, there were two powerful leaders who approached the throne differently: Gaius Octavius, “Augustus” and Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus Augustus, “Constantine”. Both of these men inspired changes for the Roman Empire, such as: political reforms, spiritual reforms, and social reforms. This paper will discuss which of the two men should have been deemed the true “Augusti”.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constantine and Charlemagne are arguably two of the greatest Christian emperors to ever rule the Roman Empire. While these men reigned almost five centuries apart, they shared certain ambitions and personality traits that simultaneously made them effective leaders and caused them significant problems. Neither Constantine nor Charlemagne was born "destined" to be an emperor. Although Constantine's father rose to the rank of Augustus, Diocletian's tetrarchy was not set up to facilitate dynastic rule. Charlemagne, on the other hand, was born into a royal family—but one whose members had begun ruling as mere "mayors of the palace," evolved into kings, and would never have imagined themselves becoming "emperors" before the days of Charlemagne himself.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two aspects of the Roman politics and culture change noticeably; the rise of Christianity, and the division of the empire which ended with an Eastern and a Western Roman Empire. Christianity altered the Roman lifestyle, while the decentralization of the Empire left Western Europe without a strong political system until the formation of the Holy Roman Empire. Although these changes marked the beginning of the Byzantine Empire, an important continuity shaped the Byzantine political attitude; the conservation of the Greco-Roman laws and ideas. When the Roman Empire split during the 3rd century, it was having both internal and external conflicts, unable to control its vast lands. The majority of the internal conflicts were caused by the shifting in religious practices and beliefs amongst the citizens, of which Christianity was a part of.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    During The time of The Roman Empire we were given emperors who understood the needs of the empire .People who put in place rules, structures and successors who would result in the continuation of a great empire. With Emperors such as Septimus Severus during the third century and Valentinian the Third during the fifth century we see a shying away of the golden age of Rome and a republic deemed more towards selfish desires, and fulfilling their own needs and wants rather than the State of Rome. With these Emperors, poor choices and the desire to place unfit people in charge of the Empire helped to bring down Rome. During the second Century Rome was in its stage of so called Golden Era Enjoying the Pax Romana and having great success due to the Reign of the five good Emperors.…

    • 2385 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In my opinion, the Diocletian Reforms were not successful. Diocletian's Reforms had major consequences within finances and social aspects. Diocletian created reforms within imperial rule in order to avoid civil wars and to defend against invaders. The main idea of this reform was "subside the government's power to strengthen it" like The Making of the West states on page 209. This idea was risky as it heightened the risk of civil wars between co-leaders.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The unified Empire reached its largest size under Trajan. Trajan’s successors realized that the empire had grown to big to rule effectively. Rome focused on protecting borders rather than expanding. Diocletian soon realised that rome was too big and divided rome into two western roman empire and eastern roman empire.…

    • 50 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Regarded as one of the five good rulers, Marcus Ulpius Traianus, more commonly known as the great Emperor Trajan ruled the Roman empire from 98 to 117 CE (Nationalgeographic.com, 2016). Stretching Rome 's empire to its peak, introducing philanthropic social laws and introducing a mass amount of wealth to Rome were some of Trajan 's amazing feats. So great were his skills in public and military service, Trajan was adopted by Former Emperor Nerva as heir to the Roman Empire(Armstrongeconomics.com, 2016). Only some time later would Trajan embark on his first and most important wars that would change Rome 's empire drastically. In fact, it was Trajan 's Dacian Wars that massively changed the Roman Empire socially.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The senate in the Roman Republic had created a nice life for themselves with little to no opposition. The senate made their decisions based on what would make them wealthier and there for more powerful in the society of the Roman Republic. The rich got richer, the poor poorer and a few aspiring politicians saw the chance to make a name for themselves using that unfortunate fact in the Roman Republic’s history. This tactic was employed by the Gracchus brothers and that caused a tremor in the lives of the senate but it wouldn’t be enough to topple their golden thrones. It would take the combined effort of three men and the senate themselves to topple the Roman Republic.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Decline Of Roman Empire

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The influential and dominant Roman Empire fell due to overexpansion which led to the Empire being split and created vulnerability among the Empire. When Romulus Augustus died, the Roman Empire lost sight of their polytheistic and slave driven society, which lead to disagreement of right and wrong amidst the people. After Romulus Augustus no one man was able to govern the whole Roman Empire, this forced Diocletian to divide Rome into two Empires, the Western and Eastern Empire. Once Rome had lost their dominant ruler, they became vulnerable and weak to outside attacks, this lead to a decline in trade and overall income which made it impossible for the Empire to survive. The prosperous Roman Empire was founded in 27 BC, but after grueling outside…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fall Of Roman Empire Essay

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    Christianity’s control grew greatly and rapidly and this minimized the power of the empire. The church leader’s power increased while the Roman Empire’s power decreased. “Over time, Church leaders became influential and took away power from the emperor.” (Google.com) Some of the Christian’s beliefs and ways of life conflicted with the laws of the empire and the people chose Christian laws over the Empire’s laws. This contributed to the decline of the Roman Empire.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fall of the ‘Western Roman Empire’ was caused by a number of internal and external factors spread over more than a century. Their are many theories providing an explanation for the the fall of the empire and pinpointing the beginning of its decay, however one of the most accepted theories begins in the reign of Emperor Constantine (306-337 A.D) and his part in the split of the Roman Empire into two ‘West’ and ‘East’ regions and ends with the abdication of Romulus Augustus in 475 A.D. Responsibility is also given to the many waves of barbarians migrating into and pillaging the outer regions of the Western Empire, as well as widespread corruption, economic and social issues within the empire. The theory of government corruption having a…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fall of the Republic was caused not only by one individual’s actions or one event but a culmination of several actions from different individuals and events. Unfortunately, some influenced massively in the Roman society. There Large and quick expansions from Rome’s foundation as an underdeveloped city; creating enormous holes in the governing and political ability in the Senate. While the powerful individuals of Roman mob like the general were jockeyed for position. The Roman life was facing differences far more rapidly than the governing body could manage.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fall of the seemingly all-powerful Roman Empire has been blamed on a tremendously long list of mistakes and events that are still heavily debated in today’s society; some examples of the these events include the invasions of various barbaric tribes into Rome, the economic decline and overspending of Roman society, the splitting of the empire into the East and the West, and even the rise of Christianity. While all of these causes likely contributed to the overall downfall of Rome, one in particular stands out—the copious invasions of growing barbarian tribes into Roman territory. The Visigoths, Vandals, and Huns are only a few examples of the plentiful number of barbaric factions that had a hand in Rome’s devastating collapse (Andrews).…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diocletian's Reforms

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Diocletian and his Reforms after the Crisis of the Third Century With over 1.7 million square miles of land, the Roman Empire reigned for over a thousand years. As with every empire and dynasty, the Roman Empire faced many challenges. These challenges lead the empire into a crisis during the third century: problems with succession, population, and the frontiers. It wasn’t until Diocletian came to power the empire started to recover from the crisis. Diocletian made the government into a Tetrarchy, improved tax efficiency, and increased the size of the army which became the reason the Roman Empire overcame the Crisis of the Third Century.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays