Digital Dualism

Cyberspace and intimate computing are binary not only in their technical operations, but also in their associated level of discussion and controversy. The two apparently irreconcilable positions mirror the logic of the computer, where the binary digits zero and one have no intrinsic or positive meaning but are simply indicators and an effect of difference. The computer and the network have expanded from the simple purpose of entertainment, efficiency in the workplace, or improved connectedness, and toward intimate technology. The movement from personal computing has shifted into a treatment of an extension of our bodies and minds, as separate tools, often the last thing people touch when they go to bed at night. While the network idealist sees this as an optimistic conclusion, the naive realist warns that these tools are not neutral, and pose a threat to genuine interpersonal relationships and face-to-face communication. The balance of the competing perspectives is undoubtedly the most …show more content…
The anxiety ingrained in the concept of online friendship is the result of the normalization of cyberspace, and an antiquated conception of online life. The continuous uncertainty that real intimacy can only be created through physical encounters and the suspicion of semi-anonymous nature has consequently surrounded digital relationships in a patina of peculiarity. This perception exemplifies digital dualism. Nathan Jurgenson, a sociologist engaged in the prominent platform Snapchat, stated, “We’re coming to terms with there being just one reality and digital is part of it, not any less real or true. What you do online and what you do face-to-face are completely interwoven.” The way we develop intimacy has changed of equal value to their real life analogues. The merit of these friendships lies in their mutability - in your pocket, on your screen, in your living