Diffuse Status Characteristics

Improved Essays
Status characteristics have been a part of societies throughout the world tracing back hundreds of years, thus the reason the status characteristics theory was developed. The purpose of the status characteristics theory is to rank individuals within society based on a number of factors. Within the theory there are specific and diffuse status characteristics that decide the ranking of the individual. Diffuse status characteristics are general characteristics that evaluate multiple states at a time. Within the United States we have five main diffuse status characteristics: race, gender, age, education, and attractiveness. Using these five characteristics, you were able to eliminate eleven of the twelve jurors and ultimately select a Foreperson. Within this jury you could not use the characteristics of race and attractiveness. All twelve of the jurors were Caucasian, the advantaged race, and you were not able to decipher attractiveness based on the low quality of the photographs. This left me with three diffuse status characteristics to eliminate as many of the jurors as possible. Starting with gender, easiest characteristic to distinguish, we eliminated the four females (G.L.E., A.B.S., L.M., M.M.), since being male is the advantageous state. Next, age was brought into context. Being middle aged is the advantaged state. With that being …show more content…
Using the diffuse and specific characteristics, along with scope conditions this task was accomplished. The top three jurors in order, M.E.C., J.E.C., and J.W.R., were seen to have a higher ranking than the rest of the jury. Ultimately juror M.E.C. was selected to be the Foreperson for the jury, based on his higher education and current job, thus meaning he had the highest ranking of the twelve jurors based on the status characteristics

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Opening: Being scared is part of everyone's life. From a monster under your bed to a large work meeting. But if you can change this after observing this situation you will be much more informed. This can be seen in Reginald Rose's short play which involves twelve men deciding the fate of a teenage boy. Thesis:…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Selection jury is made up of (typically but not always) 12 jurors, also there are some on standby. Potential jurors are ordered to the court, and have already gone through the first part of pooling. The jurors also will fill out a test which was made in advance, and has questions submitted by both sides of the case. They use this test, in order to gauge how a juror will feel and vote. Both of the sides in a case can excuse any juror (with reason), also each has a number of peremptory challenges which can be used to pick out a jurors without giving a reason.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his old age he is able to maintain quiet and observant disposition throughout the play which allows him to catch minor details which others may have overlooked. His observation of the old man witness demonstrates his own experience as an old man who has never been recognised until he was called to participate in a jury. This is affirmed when he says: “I think I know him better than anyone here. This is a quiet old man…newspapers. ”(Act…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The movie Remember the Titans is an excellent example for sociological theories. Many topics can be observed within this movie, but two of the most prominent topics that we covered this semester are social structure, more specifically race and prejudices, and group processes, focusing on status construction. This movie takes place in a small town in North Carolina that has to deal with the shifting racial makeup of their football team, therefore high school, and therefore community. There is a lot of conflict not only between the different racial groups, but also within racial groups when people have different opinions of what is acceptable. The combination of the two racial groups leads to interesting observations of racial opinions and group…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury 9: He is an old man and experienced. He observes and interprets in a rational way. He was bold enough to support Jury#8. • Now step back and focus on the systemic level: What clue does their personal history (occupation, nationality, socio-economic status, family circumstances, or educational background) provide about the societal faction each juror…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paul Fussell wrote, Class a Guide through the American Status System in 1983. Fussell introduces interesting points that perceives how we, as Americans are viewed through social class. This book will have you contemplate about where you fall in line in terms of the social hierarchy system. As I read, the Class guide I analyzed how our social status reveals itself and not just in terms of money, but other significant contributions that defines us as humans. We have socially categorized as humans, our commonality extinction is to make assumptions about the people around us or label them.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socioeconomic status is an economic and sociological combined measure of an individual’s work experience and of a person or family 's economic and social position, based on income, education, and occupation. Many people are affected because the class they are considered as, it’s a huge cultural lag between the low and high class families. The three classes we categorize people in are the low class, medium class, and high class living. To begin, I am going to start with our low class living individuals, living in this class comes with a lot of major downsides. Education in and out of school for these kids can be very bad and scary for other people.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another important fact was the defendant’s ethnicity and low socioeconomic class. Most of the jurors were mostly middle-aged, white males from the middle-class status. These descriptions were different from the defendants, which made it difficult for the jurors to be sympathetic to the defendant. Juror #5, however, had experience living in a slum area, and so he could sympathize a little for the young man, and after several votes, he voted “not guilty” for the defendant. This example exhibits that if the juror are similar, the juror would tend to sympathize with the…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The leadership during this deliberation is an important role because thanks to juror #1, many times the order was stablished and also to juror #8 the facts were examined. It is important to take this group decision process as a serious things because it can be applied in our daily life, but in this case it was to save somebody’s…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror #8 In the play “Twelve Angry Men” the Juror No.8 was a very important character, without him there would not have been any conflict and the young boy would have been executed without a proper trial. An Architect by profession, he stood out from the rest of jurors. He had the gift for intuitive thinking, understanding complex human relationships and inspiring others. He believed in trial-by-jury system and did his best to have the necessary procedures to come up with a fair outcome.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The importance given to their personal values and life experiences, in fact, played a crucial role in determining how fair, and conflicting the outcome of ethical decision making was, as initially, they were not giving the boy a chance to a fair trial. The juror’s job was to compare facts, look at the evidence discussing among themselves. By considering only the most obvious aspects in order to make a certain decision is never an ideal outcome or fair for the accused. Some jurors, especially number three was judging about the boy by comparing their circumstances with their own circumstances. They were especially looking for every negative circumstance to conclude the…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, he has behaviour role which conflict and frustration taken in action has influence his judgement. Moreover, his stubborn and bad temper has effect his decision and drive his vote of guilty. The juror 3 grow angry and nearly attack juror 8 and this action has weakness his support between the jurors. The intuition or feeling which make decisions with heart and escalation of commitment bias which do not admitted to making a wrong decision.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To what extent is 12 Angry Men a critique of the legal system? The 1957 film, 12 Angry Men, revolves around the discussion in a courtroom regarding the alleged killing of a Hispanic boy’s father. Reginald Rose, through some of his characters, showcases the flaws in the legal system and how prejudice influences the men’s decisions. The film shows the racist, personal biases that sway the decisions of the men, as well as the un-cooperation between the jurors.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the beginning, he was disrespectful and ignorant towards the boy and his fellow jurors. His attitude deteriorates when the other jurors begin to change their votes. His “readiness” level would be at a R1 (unable and unwilling or insecure) as he was the juror to change his vote. Even when the jury questions the woman’s eyesight, Juror #3 attempts a last ditch effort to defend his position and ultimately fails. What is the “leader” expectation of each of these jurors?…

    • 1362 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The movie “12 Angry Men” opens to the jury room and fills with twelve juries’ arguments and complain over the murder case. The case was about whether an eighteen year old boy should be found guilty or not guilty about his action. He was accused of killing his father by stabbing him with a knife. The boy’s life is depended on the twelve juries, and those juries are gathered in all different work fields with a little knowledge in criminal justice. The juries began its deliberations; they started to vote and all the jury vote “guilty” except for one, voted “not guilty”.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays