The Four Different Types Of Evil In The Earth

Improved Essays
Throughout the world there are people starving, drowning, dying from cancer, etc. and there is nothing that a single person can do about it because they do not have the power. However, there should be one omnipotent being that can cause all of this pain and suffering to completely vanish: God. Although many people pray for healing powers and joy, God does not always answer their prayers, but why? There must be some reason as to why God allows evil to occur in a world that he created. Not only is God omnipotent, but also omniscient and wholly good. How could a God with all three character traits create a world with evil and not eliminate all of it. The answer comes from the theist’s perspective; in order for there to be goodness in this world, a person must experience sadness and suffering otherwise they will not appreciate all they have. …show more content…
According to Swinburne, there are four different types of evil: physical evil, mental evil, state evil, and moral evil. The first three types of evils are passive evils in comparison to the moral evils. Passive evils can range from a pin prick to jealousy whereas moral evils encompass actions by man that are considered morally impermissible, such as genocide. The objection arises from the fact that these evils occur under a morally good, omnipotent, omniscient God. If God had these three basic requirements then it would be logically possible and within his power to halt evil from occurring, however that is not the case, causing a logical

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Bibl 104 Research Paper

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The purpose of this philosophical research paper is to attempt to develop an understanding on the concept of suffering while investigating the problem of evil from a theological perspective using scriptural references from the Holy Bible. Evil is the Absence of Good The Bible teaches that God is a powerful and almighty God. Many people wonder why there is so much pain, suffering, and corruption in the world if there is a presumably good God overseeing it. According to the Bible, God could not possibly cause evil since he is a righteous God.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his third premise, Mackie asserts that God failed to go with “the obviously better possibility of making beings who would act freely but always go right” (p. 124). Because God either was not able to or simply chose not to creates beings who always choose to do the good thing while they act freely, Mackie concludes that God cannot be both omnipotent and omnibenevolent. Mackie’s argument is logically valid, but since I believe there to be several discrepancies with his logic and reasoning, I do not believe his conclusion to be sound. For example, people have varying definitions of what constitutes “good” and “evil” and people might be acting in a situation with the intention of doing the good thing, only to have that action result in evil.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Contrary to Hick’s thesis; pain and suffering are not needed for moral development or to complete one’s “soul-making” process therefore Hick’s argument for soul-making is untenable and should be rejected. The soul-making theodicy is as follows; the idea that God has only allowed the existence of evil into the world so that people are allowed to learn from these evils in order for us to develop our moral character; to learn and further understand values. As an end result of this moral development, we will be closer to God’s likeness and perfection and we will therefore have acceptance into Heaven when we eventually die. As shown in Hick’s thesis; God only allows evil in order to develop soul-making, but there are plenty of examples of evil that…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gaunilo responds to the Ontological Argument by saying that the argument “proves too much”. By this, Gaunilo means that the Ontological Argument could be applied to anything, not just God; even things that we know do not exist. The example that Gaunilo uses is conceiving the most perfect island than which no greater island is possible. The most perfect island must exist in reality and in the mind, because if it did not, then it would be possible to conceive of an island greater than the most perfect island, that is one that actually exists. Therefore, Gaunilo is arguing that by using Anselm’s reasoning, it is better to exist (in the mind and reality) than to not exist, for if it did not exist, it would not be as perfect.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julian's Theory Of Evil

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The problem of evil is an atheistic argument, against the existence of God. It is a deductive argument that pits the existence of unjustified evil against the existence of any kind of divine being. Julian of Norwich presents a response to the problem of evil, but there are also some possible holes in Julian’s theory. This paper explores the problem of evil and how it is connected to human suffering, Julian’s theory in response to the problem, and a critique of Julian’s theory. One must assume that an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent God exists.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Problem of Evil In Evil and Omnipotence J.L Mackie argues that if there is a God who is all-powerful and all good than he would not have allowed there to be any evil in this world, or if there was any evil to begin with he would have eliminated it, but sense there is evil than God must not exist. If you think about how and what Mackie is arguing then it makes sense, that God must not exist if he would let us be tormented by evil on a daily biases, but this argument is only valid to the people who think God is both omnipotent and wholly good. Which few traditional Theist will say that God is not omnipotent or wholly good, but if you can than the problem of evil will not arise for you. Mackie also gives us a few fallacious solutions such as “Good cannot exist without evil” or “Evil is a necessary as a counterpart to good”.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Walter Sinnott-Armstrong

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the “Roundtable Discussion on the Problem of Evil”, Meghan Sullivan, Trent Dougherty, and Sam Newlands discuss the Problem of Evil for theism. All three people do not take the side of a theist or an atheist, but instead discuss the problem from a mostly objective view. The Problem of Evil is also discussed by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and William Craig in God? A Debate Between a Christian and an Atheist, where Sinnott-Armstrong argues from the atheist’s point of view and Craig argues from the theist’s. In this paper, I will discuss the points made in both sources to make my argument: God and evil can coexist because God may have reasons for evil existing, the main reason being to allow humans to have free will.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason that we even have an experience of perceived evil is because of the experience itself that .we have been through, meaning that; we can’t have “hot” without “cold” So I understand that what we believe is evil is just the opposite end of the of good. I am often confronted with the argument saying that evil shouldn’t exist if God really existed. The “problem of evil” means that the existence of evil is a needed condition for the existence of certain kinds of good things. There are a number of characteristics that are important only if evil exists in this world. Being compassionate, for instance, is a great value, but can only exist if there is suffering in this world.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first idea we face, is the logical problem of evil. What this questions is the possibility of there being an omnibenevolent, omnipotent, and omnipresent God and why evil still exists. One of the arguments made is, there is a God who is omnibenevolent and supposedly all good eliminates evil as far as it can, but we still have evil existing when there’s a God. By stating all of these, we have to give up one of the statements in order to make the argument true. The one fact that we can more than likely give up, is all good eliminates evil as far as it can.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Arguments From Evil: Elliot Sober I. Introduction The reality of evil existing in our world has been questioned throughout time based on the argument that an all powerful, all knowing, and all good (all-PKG) God cannot coexist with evil. The problem of evil only appears when there is a PKG God because if God is all powerful, all knowing, and all good then how could there still be evil. Therefore, if one of those properties we removed then there would no longer be a problem because then God couldn 't prevent evil from happening.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil exists because we chose it to. We, as free agents can choose between right and wrong. Through this we can justify our actions. What kind of world would we lead if everything was already decided for us and all we would have to do is perform it? God, although knows how we will choose, plays absolutely no role in our process of choosing.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. Are people determined or do we have free will? While some stories and philosophers may believe that one’s destiny is something that is already decided and set out for them, I personally disagree. For me, when looking at history, sometimes it can seem like one’s fate is already set based on the actions in the past.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Brendan Hansen Mr. Williams Man’s Inhumanities 15 November 2017 The Science of Evil: Book Review INTRODUCTION: The book “The Science of Evil: On Empathy and the Origins of Evil” by Simon Baron-Cohen was published recently in 2011 and provides and modern look on how we come about treating other human beings as objects. While this book was short coming in at around 250 pages, it still goes into much detail about how we come to commit cruel acts to other human beings. To summarize, Cohen argues that when we treat someone as an object, our empathy has been turned off, even going as far as making the argument that every cruel act is committed when an individual “turns off” their empathy, whether it be naturally or temporarily.…

    • 2043 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Suffering And Suffering

    • 1092 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Suffering is in the world all around us, it is a fact of life (2) and it can teach us many things that help us to become better human beings. People often blame God for all of the pain and tragedy in the world; if we are going to learn from suffering and allow it to teach us about the world whilst remaining faithful to God, we must understand that God created a good world and good human beings, His creation has been infected by the introduction of sin, which resulted in the creation of evil and suffering (4). Man was given the option to accept or reject God, Man chose to reject and that is what has caused him to sin and therefore create suffering (5). Part of learning about the world is understanding that people are not perfect, we learn this…

    • 1092 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    God Allows Evil Essay

    • 1801 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I believe that God allows evil to exist for reasons that we do not understand, but I also believe that he was not the one who created it. I believe that God created man, and that man created evil. According to the bible, God The reason as to why God allows evil may never be known, but others have arrived at the conclusion that God must want to teach people a lesson. Another theory is that he literally cannot or will not do anything to stop evil from happening because he gave us free will. Regardless as to why he allows it to happen, the bible states that he will judge Earth’s inhabitants and he will at this time banish evil forever.…

    • 1801 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics