Weber's Theory Of Authority Essay

Improved Essays
Authority refers to a type of power which is seen as socially recognised, it also refers to the amount of power which someone or a group have over someone else. Legitimacy is a key concept in authority, it highlights the way in which authority is distinguished from general notions of power. Weber distinguished three different types of authority in the work that he done, the first type of authority was rational legal authority, this is dependant on laws of the state. The second type is traditional authority, this comes from different habits and different social structures and it is when power is passed from different generations and the last type of authority is charismatic authority, this is when the charisma of a certain person plays an important role. Weber later highlighted that legitimacy distinguishes these different types of authority from leadership and power and that people who are have a higher status feel like they may have more right to give out commands but this is based off of the legitimacy of authority which has been recognised. Democracy is based on a Government by the people which their power is invested …show more content…
He said that citizens should take part in a political society so that they are able to enjoy freedom, he said that no man should be living in the shadows of another and citizens should form a legislation. Rousseau later went on to say that there is no legitimate authority and society can only work well if people have the same interests. He argued that the common good can be reached, only if the General will is expressed by the sovereign. The sovereign can not change its power to someone else or be represented by a smaller group. It highlights General will and how it will ever coincide with a specific private will, the sovereign can only exist if the people have both an active and direct political voice. The sovereign will also always express the will of the people as a

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Popular Sovereignty Essay

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    everal years ago the writers of the constitution have build their society based on the idea of the popular sovereignty, rule of law and tolerance. These ideas have become the pillar of our founding fathers for building a new society. Popular sovereignty is a form of power in which a government has over its people. This was an idea that the government was created and sustained by the consent of its people, where the political power was mainly derived from. popular sovereignty is a type of political power in which people are able to organize their government.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The rulers have the power over the people. The rulers have authority and give commands. The ruler is the head of the state. The ruler makes sure that he has the power and maintains it. In short, rulers govern the people.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, Jean-Jaques Rousseau thought that everyone should give their freedom to society. In document 3, Rousseau says that every person “gives their freedom to the general will, but they also become part of the general will and have the same power as everyone else”. He wanted equality and argued for a direct democracy, which is very similar to how we do things today. He believed people are born good, but are corrupted by power, so power should be distributed evenly so chaos does not occur.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Beginning in the 1600s, European philosophers began thinking about how a nation should be governed. Many of these philosophers began moving towards a democracy, rather than the absolute monarchy they were under. Two of the most influential Enlightenment thinkers were John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Although John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau lived at different times during the Enlightenment period, Locke from 1632 to 1704 and Rousseau from 1712 to 1778, their thoughts on society and its political form are comparable. Both Locke and Rousseau believed that the people should form a government, however, their ideas of government differed.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    INTRODUCTION Underlying Adams’ quote is the important question as to whether society is progressive and has positive implications for humans, or whether its implications are negative and corrupting. Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Émile Durkheim are two political theorists who battle in their writing to determine what is bad and what is good about society. This essay will consider how progressive or corrupting society is and in what ways, according to Rousseau and Durkheim. The essay will explore Rousseau’s argument about the ‘chains’ of society, and look at Durkheim’s contrasting view of the value of community in society.…

    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Rousseau’s argument, men cannot be as free as they are in the state of nature in modern society and asserts that that institutions and structures in modern society contradict the freedom and natural goodness of man. Yet, a specific government may be able to provide its members with a certain amount of freedom that somewhat amounts to that present in the state of nature. He writes, in regards to the role of government, “Find a form of association which defends and protects with all common forces the person and goods of each associate, and by means of which each one, while uniting with all, nevertheless obeys only himself and remains as free as before” (Rousseau, 148). The ultimate goal of the government is to ensure the natural freedom of its societal members. The law put forth from the government should be a reflection of the general will of the community.…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jean Jacque Rousseau, one of the great philosophers of the French enlightenment, was born in Geneva, Switzerland, and raised by an aunt and uncle, after his mother died days after his birth. At the age of thirteen he was apprenticed to an engraver, but ran away three years later, eventually becoming the secretary for Madame Louise de Warens, who influenced his life and writings. In 1742, Rousseau went to Paris, where he became a friend of Denis Diderot, a French philosopher and the writer of Encyclopedie, the "bible" of the Enlightenment. Rousseau was a creative writer and used everything from opera to novels and romances to explain his philosophy. He believed that human beings are inherently good, but are corrupted by the evils of society.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These key concepts will be discussed to ensure a full overview is given on Weber’s key contributions towards sociology. Weber was a founding father…

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke and Jean-Jacque Rousseau present themselves as very distinct philosophers. They both use similar terms, such as, the State of Nature, but conceptualize them differently. In my paper, I will argue that Locke’s argument on his proposed state of nature and civil society is more realistic in our working society than Rousseau’s theory. At the core of their theories, Locke and Rousseau both agree that we all begin in a State of Nature in that everyone should be “equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection,” in which we are free with no government or laws to guide one’s behavior.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his view, principles of democracy are not realizable. He believed that the development of legal procedures which are meant to eliminate privilege would re-establish a new form of monopoly. For him, once a bureaucracy is established, it becomes an indestructible “escape proof.” (Weber 1922:989) Weber also mentioned the patronage system where jobs are not distributed on the basis of need or skills but loyalty instead.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rousseau observes human nature as innately good when it’s extracted from all social attachments and the immensely corrupting overall influence of society itself. Society, for Rousseau in his eyes is a grand impulse where the decencies of human beings are displayed. Rousseau 's political theories are derived from the seemingly simple idea of arranging humans into a social setting that’s bare of corrupting elements of society. Rousseau 's leap toward a social and political order of amour propre over amour de soi is evidence of this. Rousseau derives a substantial amount of his beliefs from morals such as equality.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Legitimate authority comes only from a social contract agreed by all the citizens, a way to legitimatize the chain. The collective grouping of these citizens is the “sovereign”, and it should be considered to be an individual person. Each person individually has their own particular will which aims for their own best interests, but the sovereign expresses the general will meant for the common good.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ‘general will’ would now govern the states, taking away one’s natural rights, but gaining them civil liberties. According to Rousseau, the ‘general will’ was when man gave power to the majority and essentially hoped that they would govern correctly. By following the guidelines set out than one would essentially be governing themselves because the guidelines of society are set up with consideration for the ‘general will’. Rousseau valued the idea of people’s sovereignty and for him the state, ‘general will’, laws, and guidelines were…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Bureaucracies manage every duty with formal regulation. Weber believed that it was essential for an organization to exercise common sense and that personnel would be less likely to challenge their superiors if the authority were acting in a rational manner. As long as the policy…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays