Does Capitalism Or Socialism Affect Our Economic Freedom?

Superior Essays
Living in such a world where independent governments rule over their people there is sure to be much related discrepancy in what is considered to be right and what is considered to be wrong. At the heart of this economic discrepancy lies the question that all humans must ask themselves-socialism or capitalism? Of course, there is a wide governmental spectrum wherein a party can lie and, therefore, the citizen is able to provide their opinion not solely based on socialism vs. capitalism but also based on how firmly they believe in that particular type of government. But what aspects of capitalism and socialism differ and how do these differences affect our economic freedom? Essentially, the political spectrum can be broken down into three main sections: the left, the right and the middle. The left side of the spectrum represents various levels of communism/socialism. Socialism is a political system where there is …show more content…
A socialism government structure defines every contribution to society as equal in terms of wages. Whether you are a retail worker, a teacher, a doctor or a researcher you will make the same amount of money as everyone else. If this were to be the case, most people would lose their motivation to work hard and to conquer difficult fields of work. Many necessary fields of work, such as engineering, medicine, management and law would not be filled appropriately because people would be just as financially content doing a much less stressful and challenging type of work. People would find it very difficult to legitimately commit themselves to their work knowing that their efforts would not be rewarded anymore than another person working half as hard. Without this drive and this motivation to innovate, our world would not progress nearly as fast as it does

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    My revision is to elaborate on the economic system portion of my review and to add additional information. In this week's assignment, I selected to address the Ledbetter vs. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company case, where Lilly Ledbetter filed discrimination for gender pay. Capitalism and socialism both serve as a crucial part of the economic system for this setting. Some of the characteristics of capitalism are better working conditions, better wages, the profit motive, competition, and greed. In reference to the socialist theory which is practically the opposite and is not motivated by personal self-interest.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Case For Socialism

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The article to be analysed in this report is an article by Alan Maass titles ‘The Case for Socialism’ that appeared on SOCIALISTWORKER.org’s website on April 16, 2010. The author of the article Alan Mass is the editor for the previously mentioned website and also an author of a book going by a similar title. There are two mutually exclusive, opposite formal economic systems in the world that any society/country must choose. These are Socialist and Capitalist systems. The capitalist system is a market based systems with buyers and sellers.…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    to uphold freedom within the economy, the government should strive to interfere as little as possible, however when there is the potential for inequality or danger to arise, such as the exploitation of workers or unsafe working conditions, the government should intervene to prevent it through laws and regulations. When it comes to which perspective of equality should be adopted, a formal approach seems fairer. If everyone is treated the same by the law, then this allows judgements to be made on character and not on factors outside an individual’s control. Positive discrimination is still discrimination and from a liberal perspective, discrimination is wrong. Finally, there is the question of how/if wealth should be redistributed, it seems clear that not everyone is able to help themselves and so there needs to be some form of welfare support provided to those who require it.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    It was once thought that a capitalist economy would resolve inefficiencies within society more effectively than any government could (Maddison and Denniss 2009, 39). Although it is important for individuals to enjoy maximum freedoms, it is important to balance the rights of people against other duties and values. It is essential for the government to have this type of ideological role in people’s lives as it allows them intervene in order to smooth out the inevitable inequality of the economy (Maddison and Denniss 2009,…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many varying definitions for socialism and capitalism, and many changes in each through the course of human events. Socialism today is seen as a synonym for communism while capitalism is seen as either evil or the only viable option available to us. In actuality, most existing governments use characteristics of both. Socialism and capitalism each have their pros and cons, as well as complex histories and ideals or goals to achieve.…

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The aspect of Socialism has been implemented in the societal countries of Venezuela, where it failed miserably in an attempt to stabilize the country and ended up placing the people in terror a supreme state of fear, and also in Brazil, where it caused a demographic of oppression in terms of poor treatment. Whereas the concept of Communism has been…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socialism is defined as an economic system and communism is both a economic system and political system. Bernard Crick wrote in his book Socialism, (open university press,1987), described socialism as, “an invented system of society that stressed the social as against the selfish, the cooperative as against the competitive, sociability as against the individual self-sufficiency and self-interest, strict social controls on the accumulation and use of private property; and either economic equality or at least rewards according to merits (merits judged socially) or rewards judged according to need”. During the course of the nineteenth century, the socialist movement had come into existence, and growing at a rapid pace. Thus, resulting in the establishment of socialist parties throughout Europe. During the early years of the nineteenth century the socialist parties remained divided on whether or not to work with reform politicians from the left and was a question that would continue on into the twentieth…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socialism Vs Capitalism

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism vs Socialism There are different types of economic systems the countries use to run their governments. Capitalism and Socialism are the most common systems adopted by the governments and generally these systems have been characterized to be the opposite of each other. On one hand, Capitalism is based on the premise that the means of productions or resources, in all of its forms, are owned by individuals, therefore the economy would depend on the profits of those individuals could generate, making this system dependable of the private sector. On the other hand, the Socialism is based on the principle that the sources are owned and controlled by the State or public and the government is in charge to make all the economic decisions…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    More specifically, how much the government receives. In communism, their essentially no private ownership of any kind, as the people work for each other and the good if the community as a whole, rather then work to benefit themselves as individuals. It also wishes to throw away the class system as a whole and not define the poor from the rich, and just keep them at equal levels. Not quite as severe, socialism is less lenient on closing the gap between the rich and the poor, but rather keep the two on fair playing fields and sharing the wealth of the people with everyone. As opposed to taking away private ownership from individuals, socialism believes more in assisting the lower-classes to keep them equal to the higher-class (I.e. social security).…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dictionary of economics (Black, 2012) defines capitalism as “the economic system based on private ownership of property and private enterprise. Under this system all, or a major proportion, of economic activity is undertaken by private profit-seeking individuals or organizations, and land and other material means of production are largely privately owned”, to expand of the definition, capitalism is the lines with the laissez-faire economic view which argued that the government shouldn’t intervene in business practices except to protect private property. The timeline for modern capitalism starts with merchant capitalism from the 16th century with naval trade mainly from Great Britain and the Netherlands. Later on during the Industrial Revolution, political philosophers inspired by the analysis develop innovative ideas about how the power that resulted from wealth created by industrialization and commerce and their socio-economic impact.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socialism is the idea of a social organization that supports production, distribution, and trade should be controlled within the community itself. The social part of it means that everyone pays for all of the production. In socialized healthcare, everyone pays into the system and those who need care get it without extra charge. The same goes for roads, energy, or any other infrastructure project - we all pay the same and have access to the same benefits. The problem such a system runs into, however, is that there is often not enough money to go around, and because things are free, people get greedy and abuse the system.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is also important for other competitors in this process. In a socialist system, people don’t need to compete for their development because everything belongs to the community; instead of this they compete for political power, which causes much instability in socialist countries. This harms the development of the countries, and it also helps explain why many capitalist countries are secure, such as the United States and Canada. On the other hand, socialism may be viewed as superior to capitalism because it seeks for social justice and promotes education. Socialism, a general term for the political and economic theory, advocates a system of collective or government ownership and management of the means of production and distribution of goods.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A fundamental feature of a true democracy is total equality. The United States of America has failed to obtain this recognition because of its emphasis on an ideology that places value on greed, wastefulness, and selfishness. Capitalism has taken hold of America’s economy, society, and culture creating a country that is plagued in disparity. Yet the American people refuse to accept the inherent solution to its problem, democratic socialism. The ideals of democratic socialism are designed to create a more equal society, in pursuit of establishing a true democracy, by having a democratically elected government take part in redistributing wealth, providing public services, and organizing a state’s trade.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    ‘Socialism’ is a transitory stage between capitalism and communism. The ultimate aim of a socialist state is the formation of a communist society. The primary difference between socialism and communism is that the former is a dictatorship of the ‘proletariat’ while the latter is a classless society. Hence, there is a state, a political party and a controlled economy in a socialist state whereas a communist state is one where the state completely ‘withers away’ and a classless society is…

    • 2903 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Argumentative Essay about Economic Systems by: Dawson Simeroth Capitalism is defined by Webster's Dictionary as: "a way of organizing an economy so that the things that are used to make and transport products (such as land, oil, factories, ships, etc.) are owned by individual people and companies rather than by the government. " Capitalism is much more superior than socialism because it accommodates for both the needs of the individual person as well as the needs of the society as a whole. For example, capitalism allows the prices of all goods and services to be set by the market. One can observe this even today with the prices of certain goods rising and dropping due to supply and demand. Some might say that unstable prices make for an unstable economy.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics