Realism Vs Liberalism

Improved Essays
Liberalism is the theoretical idea that plurality of actors in the are very important in the international arena. Actors such as private, non-governmental, businesses, and individual leaders shape a state’s foreign policy and have become an important role in the global economy. Liberal’s concentrate on economic freedom like free markets and capitalism as well as democracy as a political system. These freedoms are seen as cooperation and interdependence amongst the international arena. Their personal characteristics is influenced by their decision making and for the individual to create a just society based on reason. “Liberalism argues that all levels of analysis matter in order to understand what is happening in international politics” …show more content…
Liberalism also reinforces political and economic freedom for a peaceful world order. This is a very different contrast from realism who relies on conflict and security domain that is argued. There are many differences between these two theories of thought. Unlike neorealism which perceives the state as the primary actor, liberalism sees individual acts as crucial to the international arena. Liberalism does agree with realism about the sole importance of a sovereign state. “The structure of democratic government limits and constrains the types of conflicts over which democratic leaders can mobilize society” (Haupt 2016, T2L2, 10). Ikenberry describes that there are various strands of liberalism. One strand is that “free trade and economic openness both create and reinforce democracy, because open markets support more open and less autocratic regimes” (America’s Grand Liberal Strategy p. 48). Liberalism’s logic believes free trade will give rise to a state’s well-being, which will create more peace amongst the state. Ikenberry asserts that “The liberal international order has succeeded over the decades because its rules and institutions have not just enshrined open trade and free markets but also provided tools for governments to …show more content…
It is essential to cooperate to provide negotiations among other nations, create rules for trade and international law. It is essential for self interested states to cooperate for the best of its state. Along with Neorealism, Neoliberalism acknowledges the existence of international anarchy, but recognizes that cooperation and working with one another is beneficial to both parties. Like the United Nations, intergovernmental institutions work to gather nations to voice their opinions and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The political beliefs of the American people in the year 2016 can be characterized as reform liberalism. Although the American political culture contains numerous core ideals and values as all American share different views, the vast majority of people support general ideas including equality, liberty, and order. America allows each individual to have their own personal beliefs within the political sphere. Different generations live through different experiences which significantly shapes the thinking of individuals. Political beliefs and ideologies form due to the resolutions regarding different conflicts.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The philosophy of ‘Liberalism’ can encompass a range of different and competing ideas, but can be broadly defined as belief system that places distinct value on the rights and freedoms of the individual and how political power is exercised to uphold those freedoms. Liberalism is often separated into two strands; Classical Liberalism and Social Liberalism. Classical Liberalism, which itself encompasses Economic Liberalism, is a philosophy that concerns itself with the limitation of the power and scope of government and its interference in the free market economy. It promotes the belief that individuals can make decisions that provide the greatest benefit to themselves, and rejects the belief that a government can know what is best for everyone.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is important to note however, that although liberalism have more benefits for both sides involved, it also has some flaws. In opposite to realism, in liberalism power is present in private as well…

    • 1119 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liberalism is a political ideology that links together politics and economy via the free market. While liberalism may seem to be a favorable philosophy in some ways, there are startling fundamental contradictions within this political ideology that are not so appealing. Liberalism has long…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1914, Europe erupted into a conflict now referred to as World War I, which led to the deaths of over 38 million soldiers and civilians and becoming the ninth most deadliest conflict thus far in human history. With such death and destruction seen through this 4 year international conflict, a variety of international relation theories have arose trying to determine the causation of the war; of the theories that have arose, Neorealism and Neoliberalism seem the best at explaining the conflict. Of these two theories, I believe that Neorealism best explains the war aspirations of both the Allied and Central Powers. Beginning on the theory of Neoliberalism; it begins with a theory in which states are self interested players willing to cooperate…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Liberal War

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tenet that I would like to discuss in this Conceptual Response is ‘Liberal Wars have a distinct relationship to territory insomuch as spatiality is firmly bound to active living space’ (Evans, 2011, p.750-751). Liberalism, understanding by most people, is the ideology based on the ideas of equality and freedom. However, in ‘The Liberal War Thesis’, the author Brad Evans illustrates that liberalism is not simply a set of principles, but ‘a regime of power that wages the destiny of the species on the success of its own political strategies’ (Evans, 2011, p.748). Although liberalism has always been associated with the idea of peace and security, it does not equal to pacifism since it was usually realized through violence and wars. Moreover, as we discussed in class, the liberal way of war is to ‘make war on life for the purpose of making life live’, which means that the liberals are using war as a tool to end…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism and Liberalism are theories in international politics that have different levels of analysis. Nevertheless, many key differences and similarities go hand in hand when talked about the Post World War II. Realism is a theory essentially about power and security. Many political actors and states view the world as a dangerous place and only the strong will survive.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The oldest liberal ideology, classical liberalism, which first emerged during the enlightenment era, expresses humans as naturally egoistic beings who are more than capable of governing themselves. Classical liberals, such as Thomas Paine, refer to the state as a “necessary evil” that establishes law for the good of society, but also impairs the natural right of freedom of the individual, illustrating a ‘negative’ view of freedom. Classical liberals believe in a laissez-faire and free capitalist economy, a theory that is strongly criticised by modern liberals who argue the economic and social implications of a free trade system. On the other hand, modern liberalism shows a ‘positive’ view towards freedom, maintaining that state intervention should exists solely to enrich the lives vulnerable individuals in order for them to prosper and grow. In addition, the modern sense of liberalism believes that social and economic intervention of the state will rectify mistake brought on by the classical liberal era, e.g. unemployment.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Theories can help simplify the complexities of international politics. Theories help create an abstract understanding and an explanation of why and how the states behave. Realism, liberalism, and constructivism all have different perspectives of how the states should operate, but not one of those theories is more accurate than the other or explains the real world problems. I organized this paper based on the most famous theories: realism,liberalism, and constructivism along with their core perceptions of the world and their criticism following regards them through other lenses.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realists and Liberalist are often times conflicting on how they think about different issues and the way they go about constructing their own nations. But, institutionalism bridges a gap between the both of them. Institutionalism functions as a neutral territory that aims to diffuse potentially competing and conflicting issues. Realism, being the oldest International Relations theory gives a pessimistic view of human nature. Realists believe that.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Currently, liberalism which is an idea that supports the liberal economic activity rather than the economy controlled by government is a controversial social, economic, and political issue. And it is an issue that may have direct effect on the household economy. Therefore, whether you support or criticize liberalism, it is important to know what the opinion of the liberalist is. Deirdre N. McCloskey provides her argument which supports liberalism in an article “The Formula for a Richer World? Equality, Liberty, Justice.”…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism, Liberalism, and Constructivism are all three important theories in the world of International Relations and while there are many differences between the three perspectives, there is still one main similarity. Realism and Liberalism are well-known theories, while Constructivism happens to fall into the category of alternative views. Anarchy is a condition of International Relations that requires states to rely on their own power(Shiraev and Zubok.41). Each theory provides strong arguments as to how much cooperation is possible under anarchy, but in my honest opinion, I believe that Liberalism is the theory that provides the strongest argument as to how cooperation is possible under anarchy.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this paper, I will expand the Neorealist argument that international cooperation is unlikely due to the constraints of anarchy, and that cooperation will only occur when two states face a common threat. I will also present the Neoliberal argument that holds international cooperation as difficult, yet likely, so long as institutions are in place to lower transaction costs. From a Neorealist perspective international cooperation is highly unlikely. Neorealists assert that there is no overarching authority in the international system. The only major actors in international politics are sovereign states.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Topic: Liberalism has become the dominant approach to international political economy since the end of the Cold War. Discuss the evidence that proves this dominance and also discuss the positives and the negatives of the liberalist orientation of the global economy. The discussion below is going to elaborate on the dominance of the Liberal in the international political economy (IPE) by expanding on the liberal approach, IPE and its elements, Liberal IPE perspective, the Cold War, positives and criticisms of the Liberal approach Liberalism Liberalism began around World War II; it is a creation of the collapse of feudalism and evolution of a market place. (Heywood 2007).…

    • 2483 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Oxford Dictionary online (2016) defines international relations as “the way in which two or more nations interact with and regard each other, especially in the context of political, economic, or cultural relationships”. However, what to include and exclude in the definition is a controversial topic and there is still no decisive answer of what international relations means. Scholars have been suggesting various definitions, for instance, one source stated that International Relations (i.e. the study of international relations, referred to as IR) is defined as “the study of interactions among the various actors that participate in international politics including states, international organizations…and individuals” (Mingst et al. 2014: 2)…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays