Realism Vs Liberalism

Improved Essays
Liberalism is the theoretical idea that plurality of actors in the are very important in the international arena. Actors such as private, non-governmental, businesses, and individual leaders shape a state’s foreign policy and have become an important role in the global economy. Liberal’s concentrate on economic freedom like free markets and capitalism as well as democracy as a political system. These freedoms are seen as cooperation and interdependence amongst the international arena. Their personal characteristics is influenced by their decision making and for the individual to create a just society based on reason. “Liberalism argues that all levels of analysis matter in order to understand what is happening in international politics” …show more content…
Liberalism also reinforces political and economic freedom for a peaceful world order. This is a very different contrast from realism who relies on conflict and security domain that is argued. There are many differences between these two theories of thought. Unlike neorealism which perceives the state as the primary actor, liberalism sees individual acts as crucial to the international arena. Liberalism does agree with realism about the sole importance of a sovereign state. “The structure of democratic government limits and constrains the types of conflicts over which democratic leaders can mobilize society” (Haupt 2016, T2L2, 10). Ikenberry describes that there are various strands of liberalism. One strand is that “free trade and economic openness both create and reinforce democracy, because open markets support more open and less autocratic regimes” (America’s Grand Liberal Strategy p. 48). Liberalism’s logic believes free trade will give rise to a state’s well-being, which will create more peace amongst the state. Ikenberry asserts that “The liberal international order has succeeded over the decades because its rules and institutions have not just enshrined open trade and free markets but also provided tools for governments to …show more content…
It is essential to cooperate to provide negotiations among other nations, create rules for trade and international law. It is essential for self interested states to cooperate for the best of its state. Along with Neorealism, Neoliberalism acknowledges the existence of international anarchy, but recognizes that cooperation and working with one another is beneficial to both parties. Like the United Nations, intergovernmental institutions work to gather nations to voice their opinions and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    After WW1, the winners which were the United States, United Kingdom, and France adapted the underlying principles of liberalism that has been practiced since the 17th and 18th centuries to try and avoid war. Liberal thought is grounded in a notion that human nature is good, not evil, meaning that states thrive in a world governed by morality and law. States want to cooperate to achieve mutual goals in peace. Just like realism, liberalism derives from the observations and interpretations of political situations. Liberalism argues for human rights, parliamentary democracy, and free trade, while also maintaining that all such goals begin within the state.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liberalism Vs Realism

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In contrast, Liberals believe that military power is not the most important power; economic and moral power, are. Liberals comprehend that the UN cannot force countries to obey, however they believe that it is still very important. This is because they consider that international organisations give different countries ways to cooperate with one another, in order to gain one’s trust. One can gather that where there is Liberalism, there is a Democracy. (Plattner, 1998).…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Firstly, liberalism stems from a stream of thought that believes that morality, law and international organization can form the basis of global relations to make peaceful cooperation possible. Liberalism is also optimistic about the international community and its ability to achieve diplomatic solutions while viewing states as part of a collective rather than a unitary actor motivated by self-interest. To this end, liberals challenge the realism assumption that the international system is anarchic by that there are norms, institutions and laws that can establish a form of global authority that state can adhere to. Liberalism argues for the complexities of the international system by asserting that the realist viewpoint is unjustified in its blanket claim about the international system. Secondly, liberals take issue with realism’s unitary actors assumption and argue that along with state actors are a number of nonstate actors, non-governmental and intergovernmental organizations, that contribute to the pursuit of nationalistic goals.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Citizens appreciate that the benefits of trade can be enjoyed under conditions of peace. Liberal philosophers, beginning with John Locke in the seventeenth century, saw great potential for human progress in modern civil society and capitalist economy, both of which could flourish in states which guaranteed individual liberty (Jackson and Sorenson, 98). Liberalists believe that states should cooperate for resources. Liberalists believe that individual’s share many interests and can thus engage in collaborative and cooperative social action, domestically as well as internationally, which results in greater benefits for everybody at home and abroad (Jackson and Sorenson, 98). Liberalists believe that an increasing interstate cooperation thus brings the best chances for development and peace.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Modern liberalism and modern conservatism are both incomplete without one another. Both groups carry a unique quality that can bring society together and completes the society. Modern conservatism leans more towards the economy as modern liberalism aids liberty. For instance, without modern liberalism we would not be able to understand that “the government must protect individuals from the inequities of modern society and correct the injustices and failures of “free-market” capitalism including environmental degradation.” Liberals believe that the government plays the role of protecting those rights and disaster from occurring. On the other hand, modern conservatives “emphasize individual property rights and limited government (classical liberalism).”…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reform liberalists favor the idea that freedom comes when the government is actively involved in the lives of the individuals as it is the government’s duty to protect individual as well as human rights. This political belief favors equality of opportunity in which the addition of government empowers the individual by removing social disparities that may hold the individual back regardless of differences. Furthermore, reform liberalism promotes government involvement to ensure an equal distribution of wealth regarding the reallocation of goods and services in order to create a stable societal environment. Therefore, in order for an individual to reach his or her full potential, reform liberalism favors government intervention in order to ensure equality among…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    To continue, it should be stated that neo-liberalism differs significantly from the canonical liberal-idealistic paradigm. Its main characteristic is the recognition of the need for partial state participation in the regulation of socio-economic processes. This is the main difference between neo-liberalism and classical liberalism, which proclaimed the principle of total non-interference of the state in the socio-economic life of society. Neo-liberals, therefore, consider international cooperation not only possible, but also necessary for achieving stability, social progress and world…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social Equity Liberalism

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    that markets free of restrictions and barriers are most productive. Peters writes that the most significant threat to individual freedom, from the neoliberal perspective, is the government. Also that it is the role of the government to facilitate an uninhibited place for the individual economic participation (pp. 64). The other dominant model that Peters identifies is Social Equity Liberalism (SEL).…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Liberals believe that government action should be taken to achieve equality for each and every citizen. They believe that the government has obligations it needs to fulfill, so government intervention is favorable, especially within the economy where it needs to regulate business and government programs. Conservatives on the other hand prefer smaller, slower changes. Rather than having the government involved in the economy, they prefer a laissez faire regulation of the market and businesses. One particularly distinctual factor of conservatives is that they believe in the concept of volunteerism and self-advocacy compared to the liberal belief that it’s largely the government’s responsibility to take care of its citizens.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    International Organizations, such as the United Nations, when utilized correctly and efficiently, allow countries to interact with one another and can lead to peaceful resolutions and conversations. Realists, on the other hand, see the international system as anarchical, and cannot be made more peaceful without exertion of power. The large discrepancy in regard for international organizations reflects the realist notion of self-interest and desire for competition in the global system. Liberalism strives towards mutually beneficial exchanges between countries, peace, and the spread of democratic institutions across the…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays