Joseph Stalin Marxism Analysis

Improved Essays
Karl Marx’s Manifesto of the Communist Party instigated a social revolution determined to end class divisions and form a self-governing, proletariat, economy called Communism. This manifesto helped the Russians realize that the constitutional monarchy cared nothing for the needs of the people; and, therefore, sparked a revolution that would end the reign of the monarchy and begin the reign of Communism in Russia. This revolution transformed Russia and lead to the formation of the Soviet Union of Russia. Unfortunately, many leaders of the communist party used socialism to legitimize their leadership, but as power can corrupt, the leaders were not faithful to the original doctrine of communism. They created their own version of a communism, one that would benefit themselves, as well as (they thought) Russia. Among one of those leaders was Joseph Stalin, a dictator who brought many years of isolation, repression, paranoia and gulags to the Russian people. Stalinism greatly differed from Marxism by ignoring the class struggle, and being a communist dictatorship. …show more content…
Marx wanted a democratic self-government among the proletariat class. However, Marx did suggest that a proletariat could be in charge until the people were able to self-govern themselves. Once this occurred Marx promised to relinquish his position. (Marx 23). Not only did Stalin remain in charge, he limited the freedom of the people. He instituted acts of terror to prevent any rebellions against his rule, including purges and the gulags. Stalin created the NKVD, which was a secret police force. This force was established to catch and punish anyone who spoke against Stalin or his rule. People who spoke against him, were Christians, or posed a threat to anyone in Stalin’s government were eliminated during Stalin’s many purges. The whole point of Marxism was to end suffering and oppression and Stalinism was the exact

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The idea that workers would be in control and that the state would dissolve over time is one that certainly looks fine on paper, but in reality would never work. Marxism turned into Leninism when Vladimir Lenin realized that without government, many things such as foreign affairs would not go over well unless the entire world turned communist simultaneously. He realized that as long as the world had countries that competed in capitalistic ways for dominance, a state was needed with a leader to govern over the people and deal with other competing countries and he decided that when Russia was finally free from the Capitalist ruling system, there would be a dictatorship over the proletariat, by parties competing for the positions elected. In essence this leadership created more of socialism than communism, but the strong Marxist beliefs kept it mainly communist. The Vanguard party would be one of the few leading parties of the most power.…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Classical Liberalism Dbq

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Karl Marx led the communist party and wrote the manifesto outlining his plans for the future. He was one of the first people to suggest violence and revolutions…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx believed that a violent overthrow of capitalism would lead to international socialism based on common ownership of land and capital. This would transform into an ideal state of communism, which is a worker-governed society based on the guiding concept “from each according to ability, and to each according to need” (Bolotta, Hawkes, Mahoney, Piper, 2002, pg. 58). This theory influenced many revolutions that would take place in the world. For example, the Russian Revolution in 1917, led by Lenin who said he has the philosophical heir to Marx (Schaff, 2009). Both Marx and Lenin are considered to be the two most important figures in the development of communism in the Soviet Union.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most importantly he used dirty devious tactics throughout the leadership battle for instance when he told Trotsky the wrong date for Lenin’s funeral causing him to not come back from Caucasus in time and miss it. This was important in Stalin’s success as it meant those inside or outside of the party saw Trosky as not truly Leninist and is an example of Stalin manipulating the party machine as he purposefully lied to and manipulated Trotsky and Trotsky would have trusted him to know the date due to his position of power. Of slightly lesser importance in his success was Stalin’s pragmatism. He would change his views and actions in order to gain support which is an example of him manipulating the party machine. For instance, in February 1928 he backed down after campaigning against Bukharin’s followers after realising this was unpopular.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Communist Manifesto was a piece of writing that Karl Marx and Frederich Engles created. The influence that The Communist Manifesto had was huge. It describes the two types of societal classes the, Bourgeoisie’s and the Proletariat’s. Not only that, but The Communist Manifesto describes what both of those classes consist of and the roles each played. It went on to tell the effects the Bourgeoisie’s have on the Proletariat’s, and how a communist society is created.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unlike Mussolini, Stalin even controlled the country’s agriculture by collective farming. They both controlled the way people thought or tried to alter how they thought, but Stalin did this through the use of propaganda (Esler 545) and Mussolini did it through their education system and used young fascists to persuade others (Esler 539-540). Stalin used his people’s terror against them, but they both killed protestors and critics, or anyone who tried speaking out against them (Esler 544-545). They both believed in a totalitarian state, and they tried controlling everything about the countries. Mussolini had little care for religion in the country, but Stalin was always a hardcore atheist.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The term was later known as Leninism, and its ideology was so powerful it reformed the nation in such way people believed it was a new religion. Marxism enforced the idea that a social transformation had to occur for the government to treat the popular masses with equal and basic rights, rather than with “capitalist exploitation, inhuman toil, [and] lack of all rights” (Hasegawa). The Soviet viewpoint of the Russian Revolution incarnates the paragon of the imperfect idea that was Marxism. Historians that reinforce the Soviet view of the Revolution claim that Lenin conquered the proletariat because the provisional government was not ensuring and perpetuating what the working class petitioned for. Its leaders were associated with the middle class, which brought discomfort and doubts.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being the devious man that he was, he forced his opposition to withdraw from competing, again, through force. Prior to World War II, Joseph Stalin nearly ruined the Soviet Union its empire due to his role in influencing the Great Terror. “The terror that accompanied the First Five-Year Plan did have, if only on its own terms, some sort of logical basis; the Great Terror served no purpose whatsoever beyond securing Stalin’s personal and political ascendancy. The impact was disastrous: hundreds of thousands of Soviet citizens who posed no threat to the centre were killed and millions incarcerated, the running of the whole…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Paragraph 2 The totalitarianism of the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany were attempts to hold off and reject the beliefs and values of liberalism, a turning away from the worth of the individual and the principle of a collective, all-powerful state where individuals served the interests of the state. Totalitarian rule seeks the total, unconditional, control of a disenfranchised population and the society is ruled by force, not by consent. It eradicates political freedoms, democratic process and legality as such, by setting up the daily pronouncements of the ruler and the party as an omnipotent force with unchecked powers to exercise control over the institutions of the state. Totalitarian regimes began in Europe and were characterized by leaders…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1848, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels published the Communist Manifesto, which called for a classless, stateless society, governed by utopian principles. The type of ideology Marx and Engels were describing was communism. The Communist Manifesto emphasized the importance of class struggle in every historical society, and the dangerous instability capitalism created. Engels and Marx believed that the nation had to go through a series of revolutions in order to reach communism, socialism being one of these stages. In a communistic government, the “government owns the things that are used to make and transport products (such as land, oil, factories, ships, etc.) and there is no privately owned property.”…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    3. Explain in detail the different aspects of totalitarianism and describe how Stalin employed these policies and tactics to extend and maintain absolute control over Russian society. (Beck, Section 2) A totalitarian government is one that takes complete control over every aspect of a nation, including both the public and private lives of its citizens.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They wanted to establish societies that sought to protect the attributes of persons, and that would negate the class system of the agrarian and feudal society as well as the political centralization occurring in European state building. Later, Marx, and many of his followers, argued alternatively that rights and representation were insufficient to achieve the task of political emancipation. Instead they sought to neutralise class altogether by dissolving property rights and restructuring the social relationship to the means of production. The orthodox Marxist tradition as developed in the Soviet Union, and Maoism as developed in China, sought to accomplish this through the bureaucratic apparatus set up by vanguard communist parties. While attractive for its philosophical elegance, to put it mildly, when implemented it caused catastrophic harm.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The theory of communism has had a very influential impact since the 18th century. Fundamentally, communism is a system of social organization where property, resources, and means of production are all owned by a classless society not by individual citizens. Communism is often applied to the movement that aims to overthrow capitalism by revolutionary means in order to establish a society where social relations are regulated according person’s ability and according to their needs. Therefore, in order to accomplish this goal, there would be no ownership of private property. All property would be communally owned and equally distributed to the community, and differences between labor (manual or intellectual) in urban and rural societies would not…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1848, Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels published ‘The Communist Manifesto’ that was aimed at presenting the arguments, goals, and platform of Communism. The publication was a commissioned work that was intended to articulate the objective and platform of the Communist League, an international political party founded in 1847 in London, England. The authors point out the benefits of communism and the need for its application in the future. Besides, the manifesto was a proposal reading stabilization of the class structure in the society without conflict. The authors argue that historical developments have been impacted by the class struggles, with the rich battling with the poor and the exploitation of one class by another.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Contrary to Vladimir Lenin, who was quite modest and refused any kind of public praise, Stalin relied on constant worship in what became known as Stalin’s cult of personality. In this sense, Stalin’s personality cult went against traditional Bolshevik practice. This cult allowed Stalin to have a stronger support system for his policies as he lacked the same prestige as Lenin, especially in the 1930s when the famine of 1932-1933 increased opposition and he started to rely on drastic measures such as the Great Purge, in which he eradicated any people he perceived to be a threat to his authority. Thus, Stalin’s cult also grew as his absolute power and dictatorial leadership style also grew in the 1930s. Interestingly, however, Stalin was significantly…

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays