Difference Between A Colonial Farmer's

Improved Essays
OCCUPATIONS IN THE COLONIES GRQ’S
The difference between a colonial farmer and a planter was that colonial farmers worked small, family-run farms, while planters were wealthy, educated, who oversaw the operations on their large farms, or plantations. Colonial farmers used plows, hoes, axes, and building tools to clear land, dig ditches, build fences, farm buildings, plow, and do other heavy labor. Planters used books to track expenses and sales. They dealt with the logistics rather than hard labor, supervised the slaves and staff, and inspected crops. Farmers and planters both grew crops to sell, but farmers also used the crop for their own sustenance.
Some of the common crops were tobacco in Virginia and Maryland and rice and indigo in the
…show more content…
Unskilled laborers did many kinds of manual labor, including farm work, household service, and the myriad tasks an apprentice performed for a craftsman. Indentured servants were men and women who agreed to work for a master for a specified period of time in exchange for passage to the colonies. After the period of service passed, their masters provided them with clothes, tools, and sometimes land to start them in their new, free lives. Slaves were generally used for hard labor on plantations, including clearing and plowing land, and planting, picking, and processing crops. Slaves were bought and sold as property, unlike indentured …show more content…
The two exceptions were Pennsylvania and Georgia, which had a single legislative house.
With the exception of Rhode Island and Connecticut, a colony’s governor was appointed by the Crown or by its proprietors. The governor had the power to to convene and dissolve the colony’s legislature as well as veto its laws. The governor could also command the militia, appoint public officials, and administer justice.
In colonial governments, a common feature was a council appointed by the Crown. The number of people in a council varied in different colonies, but it usually consisted of twelve men. They served as the upper house of the legislature, as a board of advisors to the governor, and frequently as the highest court in the colony.
Elected representative government was first introduced in Virginia in 1619 and Massachusetts in 1634. Afterward, other colonies followed them. The legislative assembly was made up of representatives elected by the colonists. The assembly was the chief legislative arm of the colonial government, but its acts could be vetoed by the governor or overridden by the Crown. However, it retained the right to approve any taxation of the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Plagiarism Dbq

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plagiarism approximately 10.93% in 1 Sources ALL SOURCES 10.93% www-tc.pbs.org The reason Washington’s resign throughout the world was so electrifying was because anyone in the past, of his such high statue would have never just resigned from power, the colonies had never seen someone do that before. All 13 colonies might have resisted the thought of having a national government because of their previous past experiences with one big government controlling things, for example, the British Government and Parliament filled with British members and no one representing them…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Chesapeake Bay colonies and the New England colonies were both established by the English Empire. These provinces were the second and third attempts at settling and were both successful as permanent settlements. However, there were many differences between the two colonies. There are many reasons why differences occurred in the settlements, but two of the major grounds for why the colonies were completely different are: the reasons to leave England, and their politics. The causes for travel also played a very impactful role in the development of the two settlements.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Chesapeake Colonies, such as Virginia and Maryland, were located on the coastline of the New World. This gave them access to the water where they could catch fish, however, the water brought many upon many diseases to the settlers, such as Malaria and Cholera. Like the Chesapeake settlers the New England colony was also on the coastline, but, they did not get killed as much by disease like the Chesapeake settlers did. Economically Chesapeake and new England were not alike, Chesapeake’s economy was primarily dominated by plantation owners, who had their labor done by slaves, while New England’s economy was dominated by farmers, merchants, and artisans. Another key difference is demographics, the Chesapeake settlers were often single people, usually men, while New England was settled by families, and as a result the community became family oriented.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Proprietary Colony Colony

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Royal Colony: Was a type of colony that was under the jurisdiction of the crown of a royal country like England, France and Spain. In England’s case, a royal governor who carried out the instructions of the crown, which weren’t exactly commands to the governor, more like strong suggestions, ruled each of these types of colonies. The significance of the royal colony is that it brought the idea of micromanaging countries. This would later on make the United States have governors to govern their state and mayors to oversee the city/town. Proprietary Colony: Was a type of the colony was owned by an individual with the direct responsibility of the king.…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is no longer applicable to our current government, because assemblies are located in places where the people of the assebly can easily access. The King had also refused for new governments in the colonies to be created after dissolving old ones. This is not applicable since local and state governments have not been refused from being created nor have been dissolved. George III had also been hindering immigration from England, and also refused to cooperate in helping the colonies grow. This also is not applicable to the modern day United States, since we have not been hindering legal…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mark Abramov Dr. David Houpt History 103 September 9th, 2015 John Winthrop’s Speech to the Massachusetts General Court In 1629, the Massachusetts Bay Colony was chartered by London merchants who, similar to the Virginia Company’s founders, yearned to turn a profit. But unlike Virginia, social unity was significantly more essential in Massachusetts. The Puritan settlers’ religious mission necessitated that the common good was put above the individual’s rights or needs, at least during the colony’s beginnings. Massachusetts’s governing body in 1645 was composed of men chosen by the eight shareholders of the Massachusetts Bay Colony in addition to a group of deputies elected by freemen (landowning church members).…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Comparing and Contrasting Jamestown and Plymouth Jamestown and Plymouth were two English colonies established in 17th century new world. Jamestown and Plymouth had some sort of Government, an economy, and some relations with Native Americans. Jamestown had a more formal government and freer economy than Plymouth, while Plymouth had better relations with the Native Americans. Jamestown and Plymouth both had some form of government. Jamestown had written permission from the King to form a colony and government.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Massachusetts Bay Colony

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Province of Massachusetts Originally Massachusetts was an English colony in North America, founded in 1628, by a group of puritans escaping persecution, until 1961 when it became the Province of Massachusetts and in 1776 seceded from England to be one of the original 13 states of America. The name Massachusetts comes from the Indian tribe, the Massachusett, an Algonquian tribe living in the area of Massachusetts bay. “at the great hill” or “at the range of hills” is its translation, referring to the Blue hills which are a chain of mountains, with a bluish hue, running through Massachusetts. Provincial charter The joint monarchs of England, Scotland, and Ireland, William, and Mary, chartered Massachusetts on October 7, 1961.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These servants would come to American on their master’s dime and work for free for 5- 7 years until they were granted their freedom. This supplied a vast array of ethnic mix to the southern and middle colonies. In the 18th century, the south changed to using slaves as their main source of manpower to operate their booming tobacco and rice plantations. With the increase in production of these crops, there was an increase in the gap between the wealthy landowners and those that did not have plantations. The crops planted in the south were in high demand in the mother country, so the landowners increasingly became more wealthy.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indentured servitude and the slavery system both played a major role in the development of colonial economy during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Prior to the French and Indian war, the American colonies mostly ruled themselves and were in a relatively good economic situation. Despite their successfulness with political issues, the colonists desperately needed help with labor as there was so much work that needed to be done to the land. The need for labor was fulfilled in two ways; indentured servants and African slaves. While the to groups were treated differently and received different levels of respect, both worked the land and ultimately helped the colonists economy to boom.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From the boiling hot weather in the south to the harsh winters of New England, the thirteen original colonies grew and prospered in completely different ways. All thirteen of the original colonies were settled for different reasons, and as a result had different tactics for survival. They developed different types of industry, economies, government, agriculture, and religion. Not everything went according to plan, but in the end, they are the reason modern day America is the way it is.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the 1600’s, there was a desperate need for a work force in the British North American colonies. Native Americans were dying from European diseases and were even running away to escape slavery. Also, the amount of indentured servants coming to America was decreasing and they became unreliable. This eventually led the colonists to bringing the first slaves to Virginia in 1619 because they realized another source was needed. Soon enough, slavery had a major impact on the social attitudes, racial ideologies, economic factors, and legislative acts because it changed the lives of people in society including slaves as well.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During 1700s America, most colonists lived in rural farming villages on their own property. In the North, there was a focus on family farms whereas in the south, there were many large plantations with less of a focus on the family aspect and a much heavier use of slavery. The middle colonies, like Virginia for example, were sort of a middle ground where these two traditions mixed and new ones were introduced. During this time period, it is fascinating to contrast these regions. Without carefully examining similarities, like the way they are run governmentally, and the differences, like geography, it would be nearly impossible to understand the lives that these colonists led.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to the geographic differences between the Northern and Southern colonies, the development of their economies was based off of different goods and services. In the South, with its “temperate climate and long growing season” (Davidson, et al 88), colonists found that the soil was fertile and therefore suitable for the large scale growth of first, tobacco, but later other crops including indigo, rice, and cotton. Southern colonist could grow these crops essentially all year as the temperature in the region remained the same. Unfortunately, the geography of the region did not allow for “good harbors and navigable rivers” (Davidson, et al 74), ensuring that the Southern colonies would remain mostly agricultural. In contrast, the Northern colonies…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Depending on where the slaves and servants lived made them have different types of jobs they may have. Those whom lived in the Southern region would normally harvest tobacco, while in northern areas they would harvest rice. Once the indentured servants had been freed they began to write about their experience they would compare their timed served as “slave” or “sent to hoe tobacco plants from dawn to dusk”. They could also be forced to do simple jobs around the home like cooking or cleaning for their masters. For those in the South the indentured servants and slaves would spend the majority of their day tending to the tobacco plants similar to a 9 to 5 job today but only much harder and without breaks, while those of the North had a system of do the amount of work you are told to do that day and the rest of the day is yours.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays