Differences Between The Third Reich And Human Rights

Improved Essays
The Third Reich and Human Rights What is human rights? Human rights are a right that is believed to belong justifiably to every person. This means that everyone should be treated with dignity and should be seen as a freed individual. In International politics the question is asked if human rights are universal or are they relative. I believe that human rights are universal rights. Human rights are universal because we are all the same as humans. When it comes to human rights we should be treated equally all around the world. There are some countries and regimes in the world that do not care for others and for their rights as a person. When this happens there needs to be people that come together to stop them. Human rights need to be …show more content…
The trials took place between 1945 and 1946. The Judges that presided over the 22 Nazi crimes were Great Britain, the United States, France and the Soviet Union (Bosch 18). The Allied Powers choose to prosecute the Nazi members in Nuremberg because that is where a lot of the rallies were for the Nazis. Nuremberg was a good place for the Nazis to meet because it was a central place for everyone to gather. During the Nuremberg Trials twelve Nazis were sentenced to death (34). Some of those individuals pleaded that they knew the crimes were wrong and others explained that they were just doing what the higher ups told them. The other Nazi officials that did not kill received a lesser punishment. The trial was heated especially when the Nazis were arguing why they were the only ones who were being prosecuted. They believed that other countries should have been put on trial also. Especially the United States for coming Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and Dresden (65) . The Axis powers made a good point but the victor tells the story. No one was punished for the action on the Allied side. Although the Nazis got strict punishments for their war crimes and crimes against humanity there were some that never got their day in court. Adolf Hitler the one that everyone was after killed himself in the final days of the war along with several other confidants. Other individuals …show more content…
It destroyed cities, villages, and people’s lives. In terms of human rights Hitler broke them from the beginning. The first human right law he broke was article 1. Article 1 states that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights (Clapman 183) . Hitler violated these when he took away the right of Germans and made them basically follow marshall law. Hitler incited panic in the people and they did what ever he wanted from them because they wanted to feel safe. The other war crime that the Nazis were charged for was genocide. In the Nuremberg trials the Nazis were charged with war crimes. Genocide was probably the worst of all of the Nazi regime. That was the ultimate violation of human rights. Taking ones life is probably the worst thing that anyone could do and genocide even makes it worse. The last aspect of the Nuremberg trials dealt with crimes against humanity. Most of the crimes against humanity came from the concentration camp. As stated earlier in the paper the concentration camps were horrible. Most of them were actually death

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, violations of human rights were a major concern. Human rights are the basic rights and freedoms of all humans. Causes of these violations came in many forms, such as religion, political, and ethical. Other causes might include, discrimination for gender and race. Human violations had many impacts, including lots of death and security issues.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Nuremberg and Tokyo trials were held to punish those that were involved in war crimes. The Nuremberg trials sought to punish “not only the guards and others who carried out the orders to commit atrocities, but also the leaders who planned the atrocities and gave orders (page 197).” This is important because individuals who were simply following government orders would still be punished. The Tokyo trials convicted military and government leaders, and the trials also exposed “many acts of brutality (page 198)”. The Nuremberg trials led the Allies to establish the International Military Tribunal.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Triumph of the Will, a documentary from 1935 set in Germany, revolutionized cinema when Leni Riefenstahl captured and exalted the fearless Fuhrer, Adolf Hitler and his infamous Nazi party. The film uses powerful imagery of Hitler himself and adoring crowds to emphasize his deity like leadership and the people’s love for him. In a time of insane rule, Riefenstahl’s picture was the propaganda for the Nazis that pushed its ideals through techniques that gave them false hope for the future of Germany in a ruthless and fascist regime. I will endeavor to investigate what techniques such as mise en scène and sound Riefenstahl uses to capitalize on the pathos of the viewer to follow the Nazi regime and their cause. Nazi Germany in 1935 was under the influence of the authoritarian ruler Adolf Hitler.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human rights are the rights that are believed to belong to every person. In some situations, these rights can be violated. For instance, the Jews in the Holocaust. During the Holocaust, the Jews were refused bread, forced to work in harsh conditions, and had to endure hours of intense physical activity. In the Memoir, Night by Elie Wiesel, it is clear that the Holocaust violated human rights.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The judges were from the Allied powers and they oversaw twenty-two of the major criminals (Nuremberg). Over half of the Nazis were sentenced to death while most of the defendants actually admitted to the crimes they were accused of (Nuremberg). Some of the criminals said they were just following orders of a higher authority, but yet, they seemed not to even blink an eye when tormenting and killing the victims. It just seemed that when the criminals admitted to their crimes that that was the key in figuring out the Holocaust did occur. During the trials, eyewitnesses had reports of Nazi atrocities in Poland and brought them to the Allied governments…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adolf Hitler was sentenced to death in 1947. Twenty-two Germans were sentenced in Frankfurt because of the crimes they committed in…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people think that it would be hard to be tried on 260,000 counts of any crime especially accessory to murder. Nevertheless a 91 year old german radio operator is being tried for all of the jews that she indirectly sent to Auschwitz. Earlier this year a 93 year old bookkeeper was sentenced to 4 years in prison a similar logic. In Germany there has been a rise in these type of prosecutions.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “They pointed their fingers, the way one might choose cattle, or merchandise.” (Night page #49) When the Nazis started picking people out as if they here merchandise it was because they were merchandise to the Nazis. There are a lot more was that the Nazis violated peoples’ human rights. Even though the Germans say did not violate human rights, the Germans violated human rights because the Germans imprisoned people against their will in concentration camps and the Germans forced people to live in terrible conditions.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Holocaust was a time when people such as Jews, Roma, Slavs, homosexuals, and people with disabilities were targeted for genocide by Nazi Germany. The Germans treated these people like they were animals. During this time, there were a lot of cruel and inhuman things that the Germans did to the specific groups of people targeted. The Germans accused them for for many things such as their failing economy. Articles Five, Twelve, and Eighteen of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights are just three of the arcticles violated during the Holocaust.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Holocaust is looked at as the most horrific genocide and mass murder in history, wiping out over 6,000,000 people between the 1933 and 1945. Most of them were Jews. But, while studying, many people believed that the Jews did not do anything to defy Nazi power. They ask the question, what did the Jews do in order to survive the Holocaust? The Jews did not necessarily physically fight the Nazis because of their brutal force.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Nuremberg laws affected the Jewish people in the Holocaust in various ways like their rights, freedom, and much more. Also, the Nuremberg laws had a role in an event. The event was the Holocaust and it had played a huge role in that time the Holocaust had occurred. To begin, their were multiple Nuremberg laws, but here are some of the main ones. Some of the main laws were banning Jewish teachers, expelling Jewish kids from public schools, and forbidding marriage between pure German blood and Jewish people.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Nuremburg Trials

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nuremburg trials were considered revolutionary because of its impact on human rights. Its sole purpose was to bring Nazi war offenders to justice. It was thirteen trials in Nuremburg, Germany during the period of 1945-1949. Party bureaucrats, German business owners, lawyers and doctors were accused of crimes against peace and humanity. Pressured by the trials Adolf Hitler committed suicide not to go to trial.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Darren J. O’Byrne, author of an Introduction to Human Rights (2003) defines human rights as universal and belonging to each of us regardless of ethnicity, race, gender, sexuality, age, religion, political conviction, or type of government . This idea is clearly beneficial to many but it does come with an array of difficulties which will be touched upon later in the introduction. O’Byrne pushes the notion that human rights should be incontrovertible. Are human rights be incontrovertible? Under this idea, rights are guaranteed and do not fall under the states jurisdiction to deny them.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United Nations (UN) was established in 1945 to promote global peace and international cooperation. It replaced the League of Nations which was deemed as ineffective since it failed to prevent the Second World War. The organization enjoys a membership of 193 nations with the privilege to operate extraterritoriality. The UN also ensures that human rights of member states are not violated in any way. To ensure that the body achieves the task, UN has established a global structure that oversee human rights preservation.…

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘We cannot succeed when half of us are held back’ How true is this quote by Malala Yousafzai and how does this relate to Human Rights violations? It’s hard to define what human rights are; there is just too much to consider. Generally, human rights are simply referred to as the rights a human has. Of course, there are heaps of rights worldwide aimed towards certain groups of people; however, human rights are the only set of rights that are applied to everyone, universally.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays