During the 1930s in the American South, racial disparity intensified with the growth of racist attitudes and segregation. Harper Lee’s 1960 classic literary novel “To Kill a Mockingbird” was successful in delicately portraying this racial segregation. Just two years later, Robert Mulligan directed the Oscar winning, 1962 film adaptation, taking the novel’s challenged tropes to the big screen, much to the appeal of fans. The novel and film adaptation had displayed similarities and differences that distinctly evoke emotion in its audiences. The film using film techniques and performances to create anticipation. The theme of race relations had been central to the context of both texts’ production, and furthermore to American Literature and film
…show more content…
However, Collin Wilcox’s evocative enactment of Mayella Ewell in Lee’s Mockingbird court trial was truly identical to the developed suspense and heightened emotion carried through the novel. Wilcox portrays a deceitful Mayella that both emphasizes the prejudice of her actions yet conveys a pure, vulnerable image at the same time. For example, when Atticus asks Mayella, “Is this the man that raped you?”, she states, “it most certainly is” while attempting not to face him. These actors’ performances position the audiences to feel remorse and disgust in the conviction of Tom …show more content…
Mulligan and Foote’s discerning selection of scenes and characters in the novel had been central to the current context of the civil rights era. “To Kill a Mockingbird” was released in 1962, a time of turbulent events and racial conflict as the struggle in the 1954 – 1968 Civil Rights Movement grew violent, spreading into cities across the nation. Lee’s Mockingbird, however, brought light to this racial segregation within the novel and the 1962 film adaptation. Reverend Martin Luther King Jr., had no less, written in his book ‘Why We Can’t Wait’, “to the Negro of 1963, as to Atticus Finch, it had become obvious that non-violence could symbolize the gold badge of heroism rather than the white feather of cowardice (Levy, 2015).” “To Kill a Mockingbird” had been one of the most influential, effective and inspirational films of the time, positioning the audience to accept views of racial equality in the
However, Collin Wilcox’s evocative enactment of Mayella Ewell in Lee’s Mockingbird court trial was truly identical to the developed suspense and heightened emotion carried through the novel. Wilcox portrays a deceitful Mayella that both emphasizes the prejudice of her actions yet conveys a pure, vulnerable image at the same time. For example, when Atticus asks Mayella, “Is this the man that raped you?”, she states, “it most certainly is” while attempting not to face him. These actors’ performances position the audiences to feel remorse and disgust in the conviction of Tom …show more content…
Mulligan and Foote’s discerning selection of scenes and characters in the novel had been central to the current context of the civil rights era. “To Kill a Mockingbird” was released in 1962, a time of turbulent events and racial conflict as the struggle in the 1954 – 1968 Civil Rights Movement grew violent, spreading into cities across the nation. Lee’s Mockingbird, however, brought light to this racial segregation within the novel and the 1962 film adaptation. Reverend Martin Luther King Jr., had no less, written in his book ‘Why We Can’t Wait’, “to the Negro of 1963, as to Atticus Finch, it had become obvious that non-violence could symbolize the gold badge of heroism rather than the white feather of cowardice (Levy, 2015).” “To Kill a Mockingbird” had been one of the most influential, effective and inspirational films of the time, positioning the audience to accept views of racial equality in the