Differences Between The Missouri Compromise And Civil War

Decent Essays
Antebellum means “Before the War,” this marks the period from 1820 to 1860, between the Missouri Compromise and the Civil War. The North has an industrialized economy, its political leader was, Daniel Webster and their political issues were slavery and tariffs. The South had an agricultural economy, their political leader was John C. Calhoun and their political issues were slavery, they were for it and tariffs and they were against it. Lastly, the West, its economy was developing agriculture, its political leader was Henry Clay and its political issues were economic development. Henry Clay started the Missouri Compromise. The Missouri Compromise was a 36, 30 line that separated the free and slaves states; as a result Missouri became a slave

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Although many historians believe that sectional differences on the issue of slavery caused the Civil War; Holt argues that the actual cause of the civil was the political crisis of the 1850s. Holt argues if sectional differences over slavery or even slavery itself caused the Civil War, then why didn’t the war start earlier? The tension between the North and South existed almost 75 years; therefore slavery alone could not have caused the Civil War (402). Holt proposes a different idea; he argues that the political crisis caused the Civil War. He says that the reshaping and collapse of the old two-party system was a major cause of the Civil War.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery and Westward Expansion had a very volatile relationship in the Antebellum era America and would contribute to the American Civil War. Westward expansion and the Missouri Compromise of 1820 would be a way to preserve unity within the Union, but over the next 30 years, ties between the Northern and Southern states would be strained as more territory is gained and the question regarding slavery’s place within these new lands. Through an analysis of book and article sources, one gains the idea that Westward expansion, slavery, and the place of Africans and their rights would continue to tear away at the union until it was ripped apart when South Carolina secedes from the Union and is followed by six more states after the election of President…

    • 1096 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Great Compromise consisted of votes in both houses “in proportion to the whole number of white and other free citizens and inhabitants of every age sex and condition, including those bound in servitude… and three fifths of all other persons… except Indians not paying taxes in each state” It still followed the bases of The Virginia Plan, but small states did not feel like it was fair. A New Jersey attorney general by the name of William Paterson proposed The New Jersey Plan as a substitute of The Virginia Plan. The plan proposed an equal amount of votes for all states just as said stated in the Articles of Confederation. They had already partook in plenty of nasty extensive debates over what they accepted or rejected about The Virginia Plan.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise of 1850 The “Compromise of 1850” was a resolution constructed by Henry Clay in an attempt to appease both Northerners and Southerners, in regards to if the new territorial expansions acquired from the war with Mexico and subsequent “Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo” in 1848, should allow slavery. The compromise allowed California to be a free state and gave New Mexico and Utah the policy of “Popular Sovereignty” or the ability for the people of the state to decide on slavery. Texas was given relief on 10 millions dollars worth of debt in the compromise for the re-allotment of a portion of it 's land to New Mexico. The compromise also outlawed slavery in Washington DC, as the spectacle was a national embarrassment.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Opposing Philosophies of Andrew Jackson and Henry Clay In the novel, Andrew Jackson vs. Henry Clay Democracy and Development in Antebellum America, Harry L. Watson provides a dual biography about the extremely different political philosophies of Andrew Jackson and Henry Clay. These two political leaders’ different philosophies shaped the argument of democracy and development in the early 1800s, as well as outlined the economic, social, technological, and political dynamics during the Jacksonian era. Jackson, the Democratic-Republican candidate, was the defender of democracy and the military commander during this election. His political philosophy was to have greater democracy for the common man.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War and Reconstruction 1848–1877 The Civil War Era from 1848–1877 saw the largest split of American society in history, in addition to the costly and lengthy Reconstruction period that attempted to mend the broken nation. The rich plantation society of the Old South promoted slavery because it was necessary for the success of the rich plantation owners. However, the movement against slavery continued to grow and it led to the separation between the two main regions of the country. The West also played a role in the slavery dispute because new western states had to choose whether they would support slavery or abolition in Congress.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the period of antebellum, the driving force between sectionalism in the north and south was slavery, or the ownership by whites of blacks who did their work for them and were treated like animals rather than humans. After the civil war, blacks were emancipated, or freed, and were also granted citizenship in the 14th Amendment. During the time in American history known as Reconstruction, the south was being rebuilt after the damage it took during the Civil War, and blacks were beginning to gain more legal rights and equalities that they were previously denied. Reconstruction came to an end because once African Americans were considered citizens and were no longer considered slaves people began to believe that the issue over blacks was done, so the white discrimination continued, only now legalized. After Reconstruction, the social status of African Americans fell back into the lowliness that it was before the Civil War broke out.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Constitutional Convention of 1786, one of the most important compromises of the early United States was the Great Compromise. Another compromise that happened at the Constitutional Convention was the Three-Fifths Compromise. These two compromises helped to establish the early government issues of the nation. Together these compromises allowed America to become united.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The time period between the end of the Revolutionary War and the Civil war is commonly known as the Antebellum Period. Many different movements occurred throughout the period which changed the way America was sculpted. Some movements that occurred include the Abolitionist movement, the creation of canals and railroads in the North, the creation of the public school systems, the industrialization movement of the North, and a movement known as the Second Awaking.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It 's hard to believe that there was a time in American history where certain human beings had few rights because of their color or gender. These individuals were considered possessions, mistreated and abused in the most horrific ways. No rights, no humanity and pushed to the brink. Cornered into a position where concern for laws and a future no longer seem to matter. All was hopeless, no where to turn and completely powerless to make a choice or consider options.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 1800’s, the United States was divided and vulnerable, as a result of opposing beliefs and philosophies in the north and the south, particularly surrounding slavery. The nation was divided into Yankees, who occupied the northern states and opposed slavery, and Confederates, consisting of those in the southern states who exploited the slave trade. The American Civil War was a detrimental consequence of this conflict and opposition of views, which had both short term and enduring effects on American society and lifestyle. Prior to the Civil War in 1861, American was a nation divided by philosophies; the north and the south. The South strongly believed in States’ Rights, where power is held by individual states.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jazmine Johnson We see a change in America through these three changes, Louisiana Purchase, War of 1812, and the Monroe Doctrine. We became more of a unified nation ,and less like a bunch of states.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As President Abraham Lincoln cited in a speech, “‘a house divided against itself can not stand’”(Lincoln). This reference to a bible verse, Mark 3:25, characterizes American life in the antebellum era. Leading up to the Civil War, the United States was divided culturally between the North and the South. The main difference between the North and the South was rooted in the institution of slavery. By 1804, all Northern states had abolished slavery within their borders.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The North and South have always followed different paths and by the mid 1800’s the differences were even more pronounced. The North was becoming more industrial, dedicated to immigration, free labor and supported a federal government. Slavery was not common in the North and it was even banned in some states. The South’s agricultural economy was founded on slavery and cotton and they supported a government that allowed states to make their own rules. Southerners viewed the North and their views as them trying to destroy Southern culture with their industrialism and growing abolitionist movement.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays