Differences Between Stalin And Khrushchev

Improved Essays
Nikita Khrushchev was a communist politician in the Soviet Union. He was in power during and after the reign of Joseph Stalin. He led the Soviets in the Cold War and was prominent in the Cuban Missile Crisis. Khrushchev was once a very faithful follower of Stalin, but the tables turned once Stalin died. He came into power and gave a speech completely denouncing Stalin only three years after his death. Most people were very shocked about this, but what shocked them even more were the policies that Khrushchev was now enforcing. They were very different from those of Stalin that they had been following for so long. It was very strange for them to have a bit more freedom than they had when Stalin was in power. The freedom that the people received during Khrushchev’s reign was very much appreciated. The differences between Stalin and Khrushchev are uncanny, and those differences really helped the …show more content…
Although he shocked everyone with what he decided to do about anything that had to do with Stalin and became someone who was not very well liked after his reign, he did some good for the Soviet Union. He was more liked by the people than Stalin was, and most of the people that did not like him were loyal Stalin followers who were devastated about his death. He handled foreign policies and the economy much better, and he allowed much more freedom to the people. They were allowed to have an opinion, and that is what many people liked the most about Khrushchev. He had a lot of people who support him, but he also had a lot of people who hated him. However, this does not mean he was a bad ruler. He attempted to make life better for the people of the Soviet Union, and he did succeed with some things that he did. His biggest accomplishment was allowing more equality between the people of the Soviet Union, and the people who lived there appreciated it whether or not they liked his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    After Stalin’s death, Nikita Khruhchev came into power and led the Soviet Union from 1953 to 1964. This was the first trimester of the years to come during the fall of the Soviet system. Nikita, started off the first years of his term trying to De-Stalinize the Soviet Union and reverse any examples or results from Stalin’s dictatorship. He tried to institute Communist reforms that had been lost during the reign of Stalin,…

    • 2942 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In conclusion I think Stalin was important to history but he didn't do much good. He was an awful person but without him Russia wouldn't be what it is today. I don't think that his actions are made up with the “good” things he…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The early-mid 1900’s led to the rise of some of the world’s most notorious and dangerous leaders: Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union, and Mao Zedong of China. Known for their ruthlessness and radical reform, these two dictators created a long-term legacy of both progress and struggle during their reigns. Stalin’s path to power occurred in Russia within the Soviet Union, serving as the Secretary of the Communist Party and an important assistant to the controlling Lenin. Utilizing his position, he got many of his companions into powerful governmental positions and was able to gain political support until he eventually took over after Lenin’s death in 1924. Mao Zedong, over in China, was a school teacher during the majority of his years prior to the May Fourth Movement.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mao and Stalin were both horrific, but strategic communist leaders. During their time as leaders, they showed other countries who was in control and showed their people the power of communism. China was not ready for anything when Mao came to power. The USSR had their share of suffering, especially after the World Wars. Although Mao and Stalin lived during different times and in different countries, they share similarities in their leadership and policies, they had their differences in how they handled power, and between the two, Mao is by far the worst to date.…

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ronald Reagan Ideology

    • 3937 Words
    • 16 Pages

    He influenced the fall of the Soviet Union by preventing the spread of Communism to other parts of the world. His administration prevented the spread of Communism through what is now known as the Reagan Doctrine. Leonid Brezhnev, a man who molded himself in the shadow of Stalin and was responsible for the death of millions, ruled unchallenged in the Soviet Union. He also desired expansionist policies for the Soviet Union just as Stalin did. In fact, Brezhnev suggested that once a country became communist, any attempt to reverse that would fail, either through the people’s will or through military force.…

    • 3937 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Similarities and Differences Were There Between Hitler's Germany and Stalin's Russia? Stalin and Hitler, the most influential leaders of two historically important countries of the Twentieth Century. Although they were enemies, one can identify similarities and differences between them. Stalin was the leader of Russia and Hitler was the leader of Germany. Both were very persuasive dictators for their countries and led their countries putting fear into their people.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compare and Contrast Hitler and Stalin Adolph Hitler and Joseph Stalin had many similarities from the 1920’s through the late 1940’s, but disliked each other intensely due to their differing political ideologies. Hitler belonged to the Nationalist Party while Stalin imposed a Communist regime. Hitler and Stalin were both incredibly popular in their country and they initiated many changes. Eventually, their hidden agendas came to light, and they were both seen with extreme hatred. (Meinecke, Zapruder and Kaiser) Adolph Hitler created and expressed the ideas which were later known to be Nazi ideology.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The new liberties that Gorbachev created eventually had a domino effect that caused the end of the Soviet Union in…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Josef Stalin was a powerful communist leader. The Communist Party of the Soviet Union had Stalin as their secretary-general from 1922 until the end of Stalin's life. He was the second leader of the Soviet Union. Many people had different opinions of him. Some think he was one of the greatest historical leaders of all time.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though his family had not been affected by Stalinization and was well off, his maternal grandfather, leader of a state farm, was arrested for “anti-revolutionary activity”.(Sternthal,1997) After his grandfather was arrest, his grandfather was “tortured, and set to the gulag. He was freed after fourteen months only because a family acquaintance interceded on his behalf in the local prosecutor’s office. ”(Sternthal, 1997) It was because of these experiences that Gorbachev had believed Stalin to be ignorant of “the state”.(Sternthal, 1997) Afterwards he worked his way around the government and gained power. The life in which Gorbachev had lived and shown his the problems with the Soviet Union and had encouraged him to make changes when he had come to power.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. had the same preliminary traits as Joseph Stalin. They both had the charisma to lead thousands upon thousands of devotees, as well as the persuasiveness to coax said followers to carry out the needed actions to sustain their movement. The determination, intelligence and directness were foundations upon which both men built their party, so what is the difference between the two? King cared for the common good, while Stalin was only interested in power for the sake of having it. The distinction between these two motivators is the difference between a leader and a dictator.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Khrushchev could be considered successful as he forced the remove of missiles from Turkey and by Cuba remaining communist. Khrushchev had been successful in achieving his first priority, which was the removal of the missiles in Turkey. In the eyes of the Soviet Union, the United States placing missiles in Turkey was seen as a threat as the missiles could strike anywhere in the Soviet Union. The “US had 3,500 nuclear weapons capable of reaching the Soviet Union via bomber or missile. The Soviets only had about 350 nukes capable of reaching America” (Give Me Liberty, 2014).…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    he also caused unrest within the Russian Elite. Nobody liked him and the many reforms he implemented undermined the stability of the communist system as far as the Soviet elites were concerned. Eventually, Brezhnev took over from Khrushchev and whilst initially, the impression was of a more stable, wiser man, unrest grew in the empire. Since 1957, Novotny, the leader of the communist party in Czechoslovakia had been very unpopular. He was a hard line communist who hadn't introduced any reforms to improve the life of the Czech people and of particular frustration to people was how slow he was to release political prisoners following the Second World War.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Joseph Stalin started off as a decent leader, but then he got power-hungry and when people started to not comply with his rules and laws, he would have them killed… .This hunger for power and control eventually turned his leadership into more of a dictatorship. Once Stalin started to become more of a dictator, the whole union started to fall apart. The USSR/Soviet Union (whatever you want to call it), is almost as if it followed the script to Animal Farm, which is funny because Animal Farm was published 40 years before the Stalin…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He aimed towards two type of reforms, political and economic. The economic reforms were set to improve efficiency of the economy. Instead it was totally destroyed. The Soviet Union and the whole Eastern Block was set into a recession in the 80’s and utilities, industrial sectors, and distribution started to collapse. Lack of goods and energy became extinct.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays