Liberalism Vs Realism

Improved Essays
How does one develop a better understanding of the on-going crises in Ukraine? Some theorists believe that over the last two centuries, Realism and Liberalism have been the two most important paradigms of International Relations. They have accounted for much of what has taken place in the world. Continuing to offer provisions of state behavior, and pose queries; that perhaps it is possible for there to be peace in-between nation states. While both approaches to the understanding of the on-going crisis in Ukraine are undeniably different, surprisingly they have similarities. Examining the different approaches and theories will enable one to form a better perspective on the crisis and adopt which approach is more beneficial. This essay will elaborate …show more content…
The similarities between the two main theories enable a less complex explanation of international relations. Both the Liberalism theory and the Realism theory share views on the anarchical structure of global politics, the rationality of human beings, and the importance of state actors. One of the main similarities between the two theories that affects the way that states should act, is how they see the world structure. In this anarchical world, states should find ways to survive. How the state itself will do that signifies a major difference between Realism and Liberalism. Since both theories are rational, they have different views of human nature itself. This premise leads to some inherent differences between the two theories. Both Realism and Liberalism deem that the world is a treacherous place. Together, they understand that countries can go to war with one another and destroy one another. There is no world Government that can prevent countries from harming each other. Both recognise that states can use military power to get what they desire, and in turn realise that countries without military power can be abused by other countries. (Studies, G. P. (2016). The final, most significant similarity between the two; is that neither present a coherent model of international relations. (Wunderlich, …show more content…
In contrast, Liberals believe that military power is not the most important power; economic and moral power, are. Liberals comprehend that the UN cannot force countries to obey, however they believe that it is still very important. This is because they consider that international organisations give different countries ways to cooperate with one another, in order to gain one’s trust. One can gather that where there is Liberalism, there is a Democracy. (Plattner, 1998). Liberals are more optimistic about the world and believe that man is inherently good, and that all states can unite to make positive change, progress and ensure survival at the same time. Impartial to Democracy comes Realism, Idealism emanates Liberalism. By way of explanation, Liberalists believe that there is a goal to be reached- that human beings can change the course of all things. Realism does not believe in this form of cooperation and progress; it only wants to survive. Strictly speaking, it wants to maintain the status quo of the contemporary international state of affairs. Instead, Realists believe that the use of military power is not just a normal affair, but an inevitable one. Thus, the reason for Realism’s dominance in the international relations theory. (Haynes, Hough, Malik, & Pettiford, 2011). Political realists are frequently perceived as pro-war, and Liberals are perceived as anti-war.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Realist consider balance of power and relative gains; they have little faith in the ability of international institutions and law to prevent conflict. For realists, international politics takes place in a dog-eat-dog world, where states keep a wary eye on potential rivals and constantly seek ways to improve their own positions (Datta, 2015). Realism has a weakness for ignoring progress and seeing the potential for conflict everywhere, but it also looks for ways to ensure security so that war is unnecessary. (Snyder, 2004). George H Bush was a realist but also recognized its limitations and worked around them.…

    • 1839 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most evident one is that of the greater good, and in the case of republicanism relates to keeping “balance between classes” and uniting people to work towards a common goal. Likewise, liberalism emphasizes individual’s freedom, but clarifies that liberty does not mean license, and brings forth the idea of keeping to the ideals “Within the bounds of the law of nature.” Overall, it is necessary to maintain stability between both Republicanism and liberalism as both emphasize different values, but together work to make for a balanced society in terms of the government and the…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Louisiana Purchase International relations is driven by many things with those things being theories, these theories then for the international events that in turn formed the modern state system that is in place today. The Louisiana Purchase was an even that occurred mainly between France and The United States with some relations with Spain. The Louisiana Purchase and the realist point of view it was completed from was one of the many events that helped formed today’s modern state system. The Louisiana Purchase was a deal between France and The United States that led to the exchange of a large portion of land in the Western hemisphere. France explored the land around the Mississippi River and settled in many different places around the region…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Pros Of Constructivism

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The constructivist turn in IR marks a shift from the material determinants of international politics to ideational factors, such as beliefs, ideas, and norms. The two dominant theoretical schools in IR, neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism (NLI), share several key assumptions regarding the anarchic nature of the international system, states are self-interested, rational actors, driven by material interests in power/survival (neorealists) or security (NLI). In addition, neorealism and NLI both rely on a rational choice framework borrowed from microeconomics that assumes cost-benefit analysis and utility maximization as the impetus behind state’s political calculus. Although conditioned by the same assumptions, neorealists and NLI reach vastly different conclusions regarding the potential for conflict and cooperation in international politics.…

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Snyder generalizes liberalism and therefore contradicts Doyle’s breakdown of the theory. While Doyle’s list allows room for explanation of the periodic necessity of war, Snyder’s description assumes that liberal states fail to realize that necessity and the reasoning behind war. Snyder also states that liberalism cannot accurately explain why the U.S. has failed to work with some other democracies, especially through international organizations (Snyder 2004, 59). However, while Doyle seems to acknowledge that liberal states distrust non-liberal states, he also seems to suggest that, in the case of liberal imperialism, people still seek to dominate others out of fear. This could provide a partial explanation for the lack of cooperation between the U.S. and other…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For centuries, the human race has looked upward toward the stars in awe if the universes magnificence and wondered what mysteries it might hold. In 1957 the Soviet Union began the quest to answer that ancient question when they launched the first satellite known as Sputnik I. When this satellite was launched the engineers that created it never could have envisioned the progress the human race would make in just over 50 years. This huge advancement in space exploration has changed who is capable of launching a space mission as “…early space missions were funded exclusively by national governments, and for good reason: going to space was astronomically expensive,” however, with the development of technology it is now possible for third parties…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism and the End of the Cold War by William C. Wohlforth argues that Modern realism began in a reaction to the breakdown in the post-World War One international order. Wohlforth’s main ideology is realism and states how the rise and fall of realism has taken place, but stresses that international world events cannot weaken or destroy the realist ideology. The collapse of the great power cooperation helped emerge realism to be a dominant position in international relations. The central question presented in this article looks to seek to ask, did the rapid decline and peaceful collapse of the Soviet State, along with the postwar international order, discredit the realist approach? However, Wohlforth believes that.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The USA is worldwide known for being the major liberal democratic country. However, on 20th march 2003, the USA invaded Iraq, which was the major and the most expensive military confrontation for the USA after Cold war (Lieberfeld, 2005). This action has been argued to be the breaking and rejecting the international law of non-intervention. But, the justification of such action was given by the president of the USA – George W. Bush as following: ‘Iraq continues to flaunt its hostility toward America and support evil’, calling Iraq the constituent of ‘axis of evil’ (Baylis et al, 2008). Moreover, Weapons of Mass Destruction of Iraq were a big issue as well.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Liberalism In Iraq

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Power, in turn, is primarily thought of in terms of the material resources” (Mingst and Arreguin-Toft, 76). It can be said that a major reason for invading Iraq was to invade its oil fields instead. Oil is a very important commodity so this can help support a realist argument. While Realism can explain some aspects of the Iraq war it is not the best explanation.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realists do not believe that the states should achieve in perpetual peace and harmony in the world. Actors needed to be faced with the fact that the world is a diverse place and one must accept and live by it. Power to them is the centerpiece of a political life ensuring one’s safety in an environment with no central government protecting them from others. On the other hand, liberalists argue that realism is an outdated justification where the increase of globalization, the rise of communication technology and international trade are resources that cannot be relied on militaristic power. It is the international system that offers a collaboration within the political actors and states.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first theory that I will be approaching is Realism which was founded by Thucydides, Thomas Hobbes, and Niccolò Machiavelli. Realism’s core assumptions are: states are the main actors in international politics, states desire power, states are rational actors, and the system is anarchical. Sovereign states are in charge of who they interact with and there is no higher, superior authority above the state that can decide its behaviors. States seek to preserve their political autonomy and their territorial integrity. Their main actions towards those two interests are their focus on strengthening their military power.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism And The Cold War

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Prominent in realist theory is the concept of anarchy. Anarchy in international politics is defined by Mearsheimer as a system of ‘independent political units (states) that have no central authority above them’ (Mearsheimer 1994). Such a system promotes the concepts of self-help, statism and survival which suggest that war is the result of independent states fighting for power and national interest in order to survive. Given that the world has only been at peace for 8% of all of recorded history (Hedges 2003), these concepts are of great significance to realist in order to dissect war and understand why it is so prominent in international politics. Therefore, the bases of this essay will be formed using the aforementioned concepts to outline…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realists and Liberalist are often times conflicting on how they think about different issues and the way they go about constructing their own nations. But, institutionalism bridges a gap between the both of them. Institutionalism functions as a neutral territory that aims to diffuse potentially competing and conflicting issues. Realism, being the oldest International Relations theory gives a pessimistic view of human nature. Realists believe that.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The distribution of power is known as a hegemony and categorizes states in either dominating powers, middle powers, or small powers. The main strength of realism is the fact that law and ethics are separated, therefore a state does not rely on its morals in order to make an executive decision. The possibility of a situation getting out of control and resulting in war is a major weakness in realism, because when states perceive attacked they will become defensive and try to strike first- which leads to…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Oxford Dictionary online (2016) defines international relations as “the way in which two or more nations interact with and regard each other, especially in the context of political, economic, or cultural relationships”. However, what to include and exclude in the definition is a controversial topic and there is still no decisive answer of what international relations means. Scholars have been suggesting various definitions, for instance, one source stated that International Relations (i.e. the study of international relations, referred to as IR) is defined as “the study of interactions among the various actors that participate in international politics including states, international organizations…and individuals” (Mingst et al. 2014: 2)…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays