Differences Between History And Social Sciences

Good Essays
Essay 1-1 Before this assignment I had not really thought much about what the differences between history and social sciences, such as political science, anthropology, and sociology, might be. After giving it some thought, I came to notice some of the differences, but I did struggle because the majority of my history classes focused on the United States while briefly touching on the history of the world. As stated in the lecture, both history and social sciences examine the past, but while they have some things in common they are also different for a few reasons. What is studied in these topics differs in how they explain the past events and how well they can explain or predict current and future events. History focuses on the past and how the events of …show more content…
In my opinion, social sciences help to fill in the unanswered questions about why an event in history might have occurred. Anthropology studies different societies/cultures and how they have developed over time, sociology studies human society, and political science studies governments; all of these require studying the past, but they also focus on different branches of history. These studies also include the “little things” that affected societies that were not necessarily included in a history class. Social sciences can also be studied presently because they focus more on human interactions, whereas history is more difficult to study in the present, as it is difficult for courses and books to keep up with everything today; the present seems especially chaotic at this point in time. Also we do not know the outcomes and effects of current events on the world, though we can reason about the human motivations and reasoning for the current events. In addition to being able to study the present easier, social sciences can also allow us to make prediction about future societal interactions, while history

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Culture and society were created as concepts by early scholars to help explain human behaviors and interactions with one another. Because of this they do not actually exist in the sense that we might think they do, this can leave the two open for interpretation as is very obvious in many papers and articles. The two can be shown to be different by their very definitions but it is indeed much deeper than that, Keesing eludes to this difference in definition by showing multiple versions of an anthropologist’s perception on the meaning of culture. While collectively, culture focuses on the traditions and way of life for a group of people, society is more focused on the interactions of people whether they share the same traditions and beliefs. Because of this you can find culture within a society but never find a society within a culture because conceptually that is not what society is.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The American Revolution is a topic that many Americans have knowledge on and assume they know the whole story. The upcoming topic was written about in both the HIS-131 textbook and the book The American Revolution: A Grand Mistake. In the topic Stauber argued that maybe America could have had less slavery had they not revolutionized so early. He made this argument because after the Revolution the British went from pro-slavery to anti-slavery. When people think about slavery in the United Sates they do not think of the British as affecting that but they played a large role.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although many of the information provided in this book was repetitive the book is engaging. Authors should also focus in witting about the dark side of the history of any culture city or country. Often time is important to know both sides of the history to be able to understand why the people of the certain parts or region act the way they do. Know different sides of the history people would be able to make their own conclusion on how and why events happened the way they did. The book is a good source to know more about the city of Denver and to be able to see the other side of…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In my opinion, Shapin’s book is not the best on Scientific Revolution, since it has a very specific point of view but it is does focus on the truth of that period. The book expanded my knowledge and understanding on the subjects discussed. So I would recommend it to any student interested in learning about Scientific Revolution. Because it provides a good introduction to Scientific Revolution period for a reader with limited background in the philosophy and history of science; however, the book might be difficult for a reader without any of that…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Winthrop Analysis

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    History is the study of past events. However, there are many accounts of the events from the past. How are we supposed to know which one is right? It is simple there is no one correct version of it .History is not just about the facts, but rather the interpretation of these facts. Interpretations and perspectives not only make history more interesting, but they allow people to analyze and create their own individual conclusions.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    My Teacher Told Me

    • 2271 Words
    • 10 Pages

    One of those questions inquires as for why educators perpetuate myth rather than offer the student a more accurate account of American history. Newcomers teachers usually have the illusion of changing the educational system; however, the system has been proved to be…

    • 2271 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When reviewing the evolution of my worldview, Howard Zinn’s The Politics of History comes to mind. His book is a collection of case studies and essays that argue for a radical approach to the past. Zinn’s work changed the way I saw my purpose in life. I had originally planned to enter a field in science, despite my passion for history and the Humanities. In an age where the college degree had lost its traditional value, STEM fields seemed to me like the only practical route to success.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    These types are very broad and can sometimes be mixed together. I think reform is not always a positive shift in history. Finding out that reform does help explain history, by looking at major events. This helps to figure out why something happen and what the results were. It’s impossible to predict what the world would be like today if there was no reforms over time.…

    • 1292 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ways Of Knowing Analysis

    • 1306 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To what extent there is any validity to the event? How do we know if the person recounting the event is fabricating the story or the person could have remembered a fraction of what happened and tried to fill in the gaps with false truths? All of these questions that can flow through the mind, but the answer itself isn’t to concrete. We learn American History because it is necessary to know about how America came to be, but how can you trust everything that comes out of a History book, when there is a small possibility that it may not be true? When it comes to learning new information especially when you are ignorant of everything…

    • 1306 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Preface to the Issue “Multiple Modernities”. This study contain a collection of several essays about modernity in general, in U.S., in the Soviet Union, in Turkey, in Indian, In East Asia, and in North America and it was collected by S.R.G. The term “Multiple Modernities” is not as common as “the clash of civilization” however, many theorist that agrees on this term in order to criticize the theory of modernity. So this article was written in order to challenges the idea of how the world has changed over time. The authors argued that we need to reconsider the definition of modernity because these theories and idea about modernity had been put a long time age.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays