Differences Between Crime Control And Due Process Model

The differences between the crime control and due process models are significant as are there effects on Law enforcement. But, it is necessary for the readers to observe the contrasts between the two in the are to understand the ramifications for law enforcement fully. Consequently, the shortest description of the crime control model is a streamlined process with the focus being a rapid closure of justice (Bohm, & Haley, 2014). Moreover, within this system, there is an assumption that the defendant is guilty, and unless proven innocent accepting a plea bargain is likely their greatest hope; furthermore, if a case varies greatly from the normal procedure the whole process slows. Regarding the due process system, the defendant’s rights are forefront throughout the process regardless of probable cause evidence. In fact, this process focuses on disproving the prosecution’s evidence, and the determination required of the court is “legal guilt” (Bohm, & Haley, 2014, p. 19).

Subsequently, both systems bring pros and cons with them when utilized within the criminal justice system. For example, the crime control model increases police efficiency due to the speed of the model, which in turn …show more content…
Department of Justice, 2017). Although these numbers may be subjective under the crime control model the crime numbers drop from 1994 to 2014 (U.S. Department of Justice, 2017). So, while the due process model was likely reactivated under the Obama Administration the long-term effects on crime are unknown statistically on overall crime as there is a possible lag on the repercussions of the crime model transitions (Bohm, & Haley, 2014). Also, considering the large-scale righting during the Obama Administration the likelihood of criminal acts going unprosecuted further detracts from a realistic