Differences Between Animals And Humans

Improved Essays
Some believe that all animals and humans should have equal consideration in all matters because animals have shown to be as intelligent as some human beings. While they do have much in common, like the necessity of food, water, and shelter, animals and humans have one distinct difference that should prevent us from erasing the diversity between the species. This essential difference makes it so that humans and animals cannot be compared, and that while they, in theory, should have the same consideration as humans, cannot. Impartiality between the two would mean that animals and humans are treated equally in all aspects, which would be unbeneficial to both species. The essential difference is that humans are the only animals who can self-reflect, …show more content…
However, they cannot assess that they are alive. A chimpanzee, the human’s closest animal relative, can be taught to act just like any other human being, and do what is thought to be a human characteristic (Chimpanzee). They can learn how to eat with utensils, how to plug numbers in a computer, and even learn how to use tools. However, they cannot reflect on what they are doing. They do not know that by eating with proper utensils they are using their table manners and proper etiquette. They cannot assess how plugging in numbers into a computer can give you certain data, and that those numbers stand for a specific formula. Lastly, they do not understand that tools can build skyscrapers. This is because they cannot place themselves outside of their body and recognize what they are doing. Animals do not realize that in performing these acts they are improving their lifestyle and standard of living. In addition to this, animals cannot reflect on their feelings. A mamma bear may feel traumatized when she loses her cub, but she cannot assess her feelings about that fear and pain. Even though she is feeling sadness, she does not understand that she is feeling an emotion. Also, she does not know what she can do to make herself feel better about the situation. She only knows that she lost her kin, meaning she is distressed. Animals are not able to assess their situation because they do not realize they exist. Due to …show more content…
As mentioned, animals can be taught to plug numbers into a computer. However, they cannot use logic and reason to understand what they are doing. While chimpanzees may be able to add up 2+2, they do not realize that they can also use this knowledge in the real world rather than just the math problem at hand. Human beings are able to determine what is useful in different situations. They can resolve a problem by thinking about it logically. This is given to them as they know how to the self-reflect on their choices by thinking things rationally. For example, animals hunt in order to get their food instinctually. People, on the other hand, can decide a recipe they want to make, go to the grocery store to buy the necessary items, and cook it. They can even change the recipe to make it taste better, healthier, and so on through reason, experience, and gained knowledge. In addition, animals do not have the concept of patience. They do not understand that if they wait, they might get better food. Nature tells them they must hunt in order to survive, so they find the easiest kill. Whether or not it is best for them or the other species is never the question. Human beings are the only species that can think about their actions and their consequences, and in turn use logic and reason to better themselves or even figure out solutions. However, human beings also have the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Essay 3 Given what we know or can safely assume to be true of animal brains and behaviors, do animals actually exhibit thought and reason? The answer depends in large measure on one’s definition of thought and reason. Philosophers René Descartes and David Hume hold conflicting views about the nature and possession of thought and reason and, as a result, offer starkly different arguments for and against the existence of thought and reason in animals. While Descartes maintains in Part Five of Discourse on Method that only humans are capable of conscious thought, Hume asserts that human and animal behaviors are not so different in Section Nine of his An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Human action is described by Mattison as free action. Here he defines what free action is, “Free action is goal-directed activity, but not simply that. It is the activity of a person who understands the goal of an activity and therefore does, or does not, do it with a certain understanding of that goal in mind.” (Mattison 48) Anyone, anything, can have an intentional action where you have a goal and you make it happen, but it takes a free action for someone to understand that goal and understand what they do to accomplish this goal. Animals do not have free actions thus why this is a human action.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Frey cites animals as having lesser value because of their lack of agency, however, the mere fact that animals cannot be moral agents does not exclude them from being moral patients. Humans need to exercise their agency, be morally responsible and give animals consideration because of their status as moral patients and their ability to suffer.3 This…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pleasure In The Odyssey

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animals are able to only have lower pleasures they do not debate with other animals. Pigs are not writing a dissertations, they are rooting around in mud and eating. Humans have the power to decide that they would rather compose music than indulge in animistic wants. The extent I think about what I want to achieve…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A lot of people love animals, and a lot of them have pets, and believe that their pets understands them, and think that they are intelligent, and sometimes these animals, these pets get emotional, and they seem to have consciousness. Through research and observation, it has become clear that animals are similar to humans. there’s many kinds of animals that know what they are doing, and they know what is happening around them. For example the ted talk about Elephants, in why elephants never forget by Alex Gendler,she gives us evidence about elephants abilities.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    PHI 1000 Fall 2016 Prof. Drain Essay #2 Thoughts on Thought After examining the several angles to the issue of animal cognition, it is my conclusion that non-human animals are in fact capable of thought. Although humans certainly display a superior cognitive ability, I believe the cognition of animals is not of an entirely different type, and that whatever difference remains is simply one of degree. While Davidson and Descartes tend to argue that language is a necessary component for rational creatures, Hobbes and Searle give non-human creatures more “cognitive credit,” citing their ability perceive, and to have and correct beliefs, as proof of being conscious, thinking, beings. Pointing to the immense biological similarities between humans…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We use our attachment to religion, creations stories, and emotions to set ourselves about the rest of the animal kingdom. We are bound by natural law and, to a certain extent, animalistic instinct. In several ways, we can do things better than the average beaver, but in many other ways we are more…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By: Ishika Modi “I ask people why they have deer heads on their walls. They always say because it's such a beautiful animal. There you go. I think my mother is attractive, but I have photographs of her”(Degeneres).…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Hobbes’s motivation behind the book, Leviathan, is derived from the perception of a man and his intellect Hobbes purpose is to comprehend the condition of a man, which leads to the understanding of mankind, because the state of a man is nothing but artificial. To elaborate this notion, what dominates a man is his soul therefore the guidance is brought by a man’s joint and the consequences of an action are related to the nerves of a man. Hobbes claims the best way to understand mankind is to turn their thinking inwards and study oneself, which leads to understanding our thoughts, desires, and reflecting on the origin of these beliefs. According to Leviathan, the logical way to comprehend the thoughts of a man is through its senses; the…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Maybe the only difference between humans and animals is that how we perceive the world around us. A book that explains how animals see the world is written by Temple Grandin. The book was first published in 2005 by Mariner Books in New York and Boston. In Chapter 2: How Animals Perceive the World, Temple Grandin explains and inform us in detail on the things that scare the animals because of how they see things around them. In Temple Grandin’s book, “Animals in Translation,” she uses context, substance, organization, and logos to inform the readers on how animals and autistics see the world versus how “normal” people see the world.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Zhiyuan Li Philosophy 2367 Accepting Non-Human Animals as Our Moral Equals In her essay Speaking of Animal Rights, Warren (1987) argues for the weak animal rights position, which holds that non-human animals have weaker rights than us human beings because they do not have the same moral status as us (383-4). This is due to their lack of ability to “reason well enough to function as autonomous moral agents” (385), which she believes is a requirement for being moral equals of human beings (384-5).…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The difference between the brain of the human and the higher animal obviously lies in the degree, not the difference on the essence” (Charles Darwin). The purpose of the quote is to express the feeling that the animal and human is similar, they have the human-like qualities. In Life of Pi written by Yann Martel, Pi uses animal imagery to show that animals that can be mad, suffer, and sad which are all human qualities. In the Life of Pi, animals have the human-like emotions.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some hunter’s argue that hunting is an essential role in their happiness, and life would be miserable without it. If killing living, breathing innocent creatures provides you with happiness you should rethink life and experience different ways to experience joy. Another argument supporting hunting is that it keeps down the number of overpopulated animals. Hunting is an effective solution however we must keep in mind of what the most humane solution would be. Farmers often kill animals to prevent them from consuming their crops.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In their argument, Francis and Norman reject Singer’s principle, arguing that humans may give human interests greater consideration than comparable animal interest (Francis and Norman 507). Francis and Norman agree that animal interests deserve some consideration, but they argue that it is ethically correct for humans to give human interests more weight than similar animal interests. They base their argument on the premise that all and only creatures with the ability to form plans for the non-immediate future deserve equal consideration of their interests. This essay supports the stance adopted by Francis and Norman, contending that individuals only bear moral responsibilities to some animals more then others, they are ethically right in according more weight to human interests in comparison to those of animals.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Do Animals Communicate

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A commonly asked question by many scientists and especially pet owners is: Can they understand what I am saying? Having the opportunity to understand what an animal is trying to say to us can be very important, along with them being able to understand what we are trying to communicate. Because of the possible benefits of man and animal understanding each other, scientist have tried for many years to figure out what may seem like a simple question, but is, in fact, has still never been answered in full. There are many people who have done a great amount of research on this topic, and depending on the person and their beliefs, the outcomes can be different. This study is very troubling, as for if the animals really could speak to use, we would not have to be asking this questions as for they could tell us themselves.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays