Difference Between Line And Line Organization

Improved Essays
Line organization is the simplest type of organizations, which is characterized through the line of authority. It is a line flowing from top to bottom, in the form of superior-subordinate relationship. As the authority flows downwards, the responsibility flows upwards. Scaler principle is followed and there is a unity of command.
The improved and more complex organization type that was developed later is the staff and line organization. The line officers which are the commanders, are assisted by specialized staff officers, to help them in constructing plans and making decisions.
In line organizations, line positions alone are responsible of accomplishing the goals of the organization, no specialized assistance to provide support for them.
…show more content…
There is loose discipline
The line and staff organization is based upon specialized planning unlike the line organization.
In pure line organizations, each man preforms the same type of work, the divisions exist only for the purpose of control. This type of organizations rarely exists.
In line and staff organization, both the staff and line officers preform a different roles side by side, and collaborate to achieve the desired output.
In line organization, the authority flows in one defined line with no chance of confusion, where in line and staff organization confusion is possible as both line and staff officers work side by side simultaneously.
Line organization is considered to be more economical than line and staff organization, where the specialized extra help by staff officers is costly. On the other hand, the use of staff officers helps in distributing the work, and making it more efficient, while line organizations suffer from the overloading of work.
Communication is very important in the line and staff organization, which is lacked in the line
…show more content…
3- Better decisions: with the help of the expert advices provided by the staff officers, more balanced decisions can be made by the line officers. The adequate information is provided at the time of need.
4- Continuous advancement: both line and staff officers have a better chance of advancement, along with the improvement of the productivity and developing the services or products. This can be achieved through the ongoing research and experiments held by the specialized staff offices.
5- Training: with the help of the specialized staff officers, training ground can be provided for the line officers, through different tasks such as decision making.
6- Unity of command and action: the unity of action is a result of the uniform command, there is a cooperation between the line officers and stall officers, but the orders can be given only by the line managers.
7- Flexibility: great flexibility is achieved in staff and line organizations, due to the incessant collaboration between both the sides at different

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Organization Overview The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) was established in 1991 by the Secretary of Defense to standardize accounting and financial operations and reduce costs associated with these services (“Agency Overview,” n.d.). DFAS is the official finance and accounting arm of the Department of Defense, therefore, it is a federal government agency. Located around the globe, DFAS has over 12,000 employees. The majority of employees work at one of the five primary sites located in Indianapolis, Indiana; Cleveland, Ohio; Columbus, Ohio; Rome, New York; or Limestone, Maine.…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Coordination of activities and the different functions can be a challenge to the company, and the employees may be at pressure given their responsibilities. The flat structure has also limited the availability of guidance and advice from their superiors in case need…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First of all they all have a hierarchy of authority. Meaning they have different levels of employees that work there. For instance, in General Motors there are the people in the assembly line, who are the average workers, Most of the time this is where the majority of the company employees will be. Then there are the assembly line overseers, who watch over them to make sure the job is getting done properly. Overseers don’t have much power either, but more than the assembly liners.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Structure Organizational Structure is an inevitable part of the organization, it can be found in every organization. It is the framework within which the employees of the organization are arranged according to their function and position to achieve the goals of the organization. The organizational structure depends on various factors such as the type of organization, product, and revenue. There is the strong relationship between the organization structure and the employee performance. For the tregety Pvt Ltd we recommend the above structure in which on the top the level it includes the owners/CEO of the company, then it is followed by the general manager who will head different sub-departments of Canada.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hygienist Qualities

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Some qualities I feel I possess as a person and a hygienist is that I am determined, responsible, self-motivated, organized, and flexible. Determination is something I knew I wanted to achieve when I started college it is something everyone needs to possess to be successful in life to better their future. For example, from the moment I started in the dental hygiene program I was determined to pass my courses and to graduate. I had to be determined in my courses if I wanted to be able to take my state board and hopefully become a licensed dental hygienist. Without determination, I know I would not be where I am today in my life and my career path.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wilson Vs Taylor

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. COMPARE WOODROW WILSON AND FREDERICK TAYLOR. (A) HOW ARE THEIR VIEWS SIMILAR TO ONE ANOTHER. (B) HOW ARE THEIR VIEWS DIFFERENT FROM ONE ANOTHER (A) Wilson’s and Taylor’s views about public administration were similar in how they both agree that administration should be ran with getting the job done as its priority. Wilson believed in running administration like a business which ties into Taylor’s assembly line approach. Many business have an assembly line concept such as protocol and chain of commands within the company.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bureaucracy Structure

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Introduction Today, the United States and other Western allies are attempting to combat terrorism across the world, especially in Africa, and around the Middle East. First, there is a need to define terrorism. Terrorism can be defined as being, “the repeated use of politically motivated violence with coercive intent, by non-state actors” (Badey). With that definition in place many government officials are attempting to eradicate terrorist organizations through military force, intelligence and the attempt of infiltrating these terrorist organizations, in hopes of declaring the war on terrorism won. Across the world, acts of terrorism are wreaking havoc against anyone who tries to go against a specific ideology.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    This category represents a “fostering coordination within the organization as well as with external units and managers and sharing information across boundaries” (Cameron & Quinn, 2006, pg. 121). This is an incredibly important hierarchy skill because it involves present management between external and internal forces affecting an organization (Cameron & Quinn, 2006). This category even represents the coordination of sharing of information across these boundaries (Cameron & Quinn, 2006). If this skill is not used, poor communication can lead to breakdowns between leadership and members that can critically affect organizational operation (Cameron & Quinn,…

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Organisational structure: An organisational structure is a diagram that shows the hierarchy of the entire business/organisation. It is separated into layers, the higher in the business your role is the more control you would have. Also at the top is the chairman. Functional structure:…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Structural Analysis of KPMG Abstract: An organizational structure is the way in which an organisation’s activities are divided, organized and coordinated. It provides stability and helps organization members work together to achieve goals. Division of work, also called job specialization, is based on the observation that productivity increases when tasks are specialized.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A traditional organization is built in a vertical hierarchical fashion with employees answering to only one manager (Dunn, 2010). Matrix organization diverges into a horizontal aspects of traditional organization (Dunn, 2010). With matrix, employees could be assigned to one manager, but take direction and answer to another as well (Dunn, 2010). Matrix also combines functional and product departmentalization creating a dual chain of command. This can be advantageous because matrix organization can produce an increase in communication and flexibility allowing for several projects to be overseen (Robbins et al., 2010).…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Organizational structure refers to the way of arranging people and assigning responsibilities to perform work and meet goals in an organization, it is particularly important for the large organization, where decisions need to be made in many tasks, unlike in the case of a small organization that day-to-day communication is frequent and formal structure is unnecessary (Distelzweig, n.d.). In order to explain the concept of a good organizational structure, two organizations are chosen for comparison and analysis, which are the Apple and Microsoft company. Firstly, for the Apple company, Apple Computer was created by Steve Jobs and his partner in 1976 as the personal computer manufacturer, it was once faced full of obstacles to sustain with…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    1.2 Organisation Structure (Key elements) An organization structure can be determined by few keys elements which are work specialization, departmentalization, centralization or decentralization and lastly formalization. Work specialization is defined as the distribution of working activities into specific tasks for an individual. It plays an essential role in McDonald’s (Montenegro, E. 2015) by dividing their employees to do different tasks to ensure the restaurant to be effective and efficient.…

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nawaf Alnafea INTEGRATIVE CASE 10.0 1. Discuss the organizational structure at Cisco Systems. Explain and discuss each one of the current structural dimensions. Explain and discuss each one of the current contingency factors. What type of structure is this?…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In reality it can be stated that communication is most significant part of a leader ability to function. Furthermore, having an open communication is key role in developing effective group. To accomplish multiple tasks leaders uses several different forms of communications, email Phone calls, or any documents that convers information to the group. To understand how communication affect groups its imperative that leaders know “communication is a simultaneous process in which members receive, send, interpret, and infer all at the same time.” (Johnson, Johnson 2013, pg 73)…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays