The Peloponnesian War

Improved Essays
The Warfare of the Greek Dark Ages and Classical Era The act of war is one that is very complex in nature, due to its attachment to mortal human desires and politics. The reasons for which humanity, specifically the Greeks, engaged in warfare evolved throughout time. As the Greeks transitioned from the Dark Ages to the Classical Era distinct differences can be found in their method of going to war, and fighting during it. The transition of command moving from the hands of private individuals to that of the state, is the most prominent difference between the time periods. This movement of power will determine the actions and mindsets of Greeks during times of conflict. The image that many have of Greece within our history is that of a civilized …show more content…
This era is described as an age of enlightenment for art, culture, political thought and the birth of democracy. Due to this Greece began to see a more developed and structured social class that concentrated more on the state’s interest rather than that of powerful individuals. The “The Melian Dialogue” is an excerpt from The History of the Peloponnesian War, which depicts a debate held between the city-state of Athens and Melos, highlights the more civilized method the Greeks took to resolve conflict. In this dialoged Athens is warning Melos of their impending attack on the island if they are not to surrender and become a part of the Athenian empire. The most outstanding difference in this method compared to the ideology of the Greek Dark ages is the disregard for honor by Athenians. As said by the Athenian speaker “Surely you will not fall back on the idea of honor, which has been the ruin of so many when danger and disgrace were staring them in the face.” (History of the Peloponnesian War, page 5) The Athenian mindset is that the Melians should consider the benefit of their people rather than the preservation of their honor. Another significant difference is that the discussing of going to war is kept between the city-state’s councils rather than having it expressed to the whole civilian population. This reemphasizes …show more content…
The Dark Ages consisted of a fragile systems of government that relied of powerful individuals. The only opportunity these men had to move up in power was through the attainment of glory through battle and plundering. On the other hand, the Classical era saw a change in political system to that of one which sought the overall welfare of their individual states, and had a much stricter from of government. The Dark ages had little to no discussion of whether or not there was to be violence if the warlord decided he should increase his position within his society. Unlike the Classical Greeks who at least attempted to resolve the conflict in a non violent manor. The only aspect that the two time periods had in common was when they began the act of war. It seemed to be customary if the city-state was not to surrender that there would be death, slavery, and stealing of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Greek Democracy Dbq

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Democratic were the Greeks? In this paper, we will get an understanding of the relationship between Greek Democracy, the military needs, and social class divisions of Greek city-states. Solon helped to create the constitution for Ancient Greek’s democracy. The ancient Greeks remained in small city-states because the mountains and coastlines cut them off from one another. The government was constantly changing and a form of Democracy developed in some city-states.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pericles Funeral Oration

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “We throw open our city to the world, and never pass laws to exclude foreigners from any opportunity of learning or observing, although the eyes of the enemy may occasionally profit from our liberality”, Athens does not deport foreigners, rather welcomes them into the city. With Athens’ openness, it allows for the foreigners to extend the ways of Athens democracy to their homeland, essentially spreading democracy across the world. He goes on to contrast the character of Athens in terms of education as compared to the Spartans. Spartans education is more militaristic and centered around training for war beginning at a young age, he says, “In education, where our rivals from their very cradles seek after manliness through a very painful discipline.” As for Athens, who is more open and less restricted, “at Athens, we live as we please, and yet are just as ready to encounter every legitimate danger”, even without the harsh military training, the Athenians are fully capable in a moment of need.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Athenians prove to be “a model to others” (62). In many ways, firstly they are for the people, unlike sparta which “was as close as the ancient greeks came to a modern totalitarian society”(62), they are a democratic government and followed only their written laws. “We are free and tolerant in our private lives; but in public affairs we keep to the law”(63). Athens was not ruled by a single king, but a council of high ranking officials and scholars. The Athenians also shared their goods with other powers instead of having others share with them.…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Peloponnesian War by the end of the fifth century before the common era commenced with Sparta’s fear of Athens’ rising power. Sparta a primitive, economically challenged land power, led the independent states. In contrast, Athens an advanced, economically wealthy sea power, oversaw alliance states. Even though they both were state super powers, there was a noticeable difference in their culture, economic background and how they led the subordinate states of government. As well as, Sparta’s and Athens’ strategic approach to war, in the beginning, was dissimilar but in the end, the tables would turn and the Sparta would be victorious.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The government of the island of Melos tried to persuade the Athenian government multiple times to not invade them and argued several reasons for the Athenians to abandon their pursuit. The Melians begged the Athenians to let them remain neutral as the Melians were already aware that they were weak compared the strong Athenians: they knew they stood no chance in battle. The Athenians countered that if they were ‘to allow the weaker Melians to remain free, that it would reflect negatively on the Athenian power” (Crawley). After the Athenians still rejected their offer of neutrality, the Melians claimed that they would have the gods and the Lacedaemonians on their side since the Athenian fight was unjustly because the Melians were so much weaker than the Athenians. The Athenians mocked them and retorted that they “show great blindness of judgement, unless, after allowing us to retire you can find some counsel more prudent than this” (Crawley), The Athenians also claimed that the gods will not save the people of Melos since “the strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they want,” implying that the gods will not take pity on them just because they are not as strong as them…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These were harsh times for Greece, but there was a benefit, which was the deconstruction of the Mycenaean ruling. The author believes the destruction of the ruling is positive, so he writes,”The deconstruction of the old Mycenaean economic and social structures with the strict class hierarchy and heredity rule were forgotten, and eventually replaced with new socio-political institutions that eventually allowed for the rise of Democracy in 5th c. BCE Athens”(Sakoulas,7). The Mycenaean strict ruling was forgotten which was then replaced with democracy later on. Democracy allowed Greece to move forward. Finally the last period before the Golden Age of Greece, the Archaic Period, was a period where Greece reconstructed its population and democracy for foreign residents, citizens, and slaves.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Peloponnesian Wat

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In the first part of the Peloponnesian Wat, Athens was hit with the plague. This plague not only killed the leader, causing Athens to request peace in 421 B.C.E., but also killed a vast amount of the civilians living there. When the war picked back up again, it had moved Westward and to Sicily. When the Sicilians begged for the help of the Athens, the Athens sent their military/fleet to help. By sending their military force (fleet), they lost their force over such a distance.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Comparison of Greek Classical and Dark Ages” Throughout history there have been many speculations about social classes, the development of societies and the overall welfare of countries and their success. But one of the most prominent topics of modern day countries that is closely evaluated is how countries in ancient periods interacted with each other. It has been speculated that the relations between Classical Greece and the Greek Dark Ages were nearly identical specific ways. The Greek city-states in classical and dark age times both had the same warfare tactics, political pyramid and negotiation skills.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Melian councillors made a horrible mistake by not accepting the terms of the Athenians in 416, and because of their irrational decision, their entire population got decimated. The Melians people were delusional in their assumptions that everything would work out in their favour, and they expected that outside forces would come to assist them, and would help make sure their battle ended in a favourable outcome. If I was a Melian citizen at the time of this decision, I would strongly oppose the councillors’ choice, because most of their arguments were based on a dependence of outside forces, and not based upon what they could do for themselves. You can see their level of misconception through their arguments that other Greek states would be alarmed and revolt, through their insistence that the gods would come to their aid, and through their assumption that the Spartans would come save them. All of these…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Whether there was to be war or not was irrelevant to the Athenians as Melos held no form (or very limited) of military and political power (Ahrensdorf, 1997). It is difficult to relay the points of pacifism onto…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Athens and Sparta were both Greek city-states that played major roles from the beginning of time. But, Athens could not compare with Sparta in terms of military power. Sparta was a militaristic society, meaning that the Spartan community largely focused on the troops in order to have a strong fighting force. The military was in charge of a Spartan citizen’s life from the moment they were born. When a Spartan child was born, they…

    • 1991 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ancient Greece has a long lasting impression on history today. For example, by the seventh century AD, the term 'democracy' had a ‘mob-rule’ feel about it, which made ancient Athens a very unpopular model for any society, right through until the until the late 18th century. In the English Civil War, for instance, people were encouraged to follow the example of the ancient Spartans, not the Athenians. In the formulation of the constitution of the US in the 18th century, the Roman model of a Senate and Capitol was followed, rather than the Athenian boule (a council of citizens appointed to run the daily affairs of the city) and ekklesia (the principal assembly of the democracy of ancient Athens).…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In ancient Greece, human nature drove men to embrace passion, ignore justice, and act on envy at the expense of morality. It pushed men to engage in grotesque acts of violence for the sake of revenge, making the ubiquity of human nature in the period a central concern (3.84). The “laws of humanity”, those principles of justice and morality which had evolved over the previous centuries of Greek society, became irrelevant in the Peloponnesian War: what mattered was survival. Political strife became intertwined with death, loss of property, and moral decline as the example of Corcyra became the norm in the Hellenic…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In On the War for Greek Freedom, a compelling work comprised of selections from Herodotus’ The Histories, Herodotus recalls many accounts of history that were relayed to him throughout his life and many travels. Upon returning home to Athens, he spent years putting together The Histories, an elaborate account of the Greco-Persian Wars (499-479 B.C.), and is now credited with being “The Father of History.” Herodotus aids the reader in learning all about the primary and secondary reasons and events that occurred, causing tensions to rise between Persia and Greece, resulting in an all-out war. Decisions and actions by the Greeks, Persians, and even the Spartans during times of great friction will be reviewed and analyzed below as well as the inevitability…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The podcast deals with the dialogue “Plato’s Republic” written around 400 BC, which discusses the meaning of justice and what it truly means to be just. Firstly, a background in ancient Greece’s politics was offered, speaking of the appeals and brutal regimes of government prior to democracy being restored. The major issue addressed in the podcast is the execution of Socrates by the majority of Athens for the corruption of youth in and the introduction of gods that the Greeks did not once believe in.…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays