Leaders focus on vision, mission, goals, and objectives, while managers focus on productivity and efficiency. Managers see themselves as preservers of the …show more content…
Another difference between the leadership of Steve Jobs and Time Cook is the, charismatic leadership of Steve Jobs, which Time Cook only has the mentality of a manager not a leader. Lastly, the difference between the leadership of Steve Jobs and Time Cook is that, Steve Jobs was controlling and Time Cook is not, Tim Cook is more layback. One great example of Steve Jobs highly demanding and influential leadership was when Apple’s MobileMe service launched to terrible reviews and buggy performance, he berated the MobileMe team, telling them, “You’ve tarnished Apple’s reputation. You should hate each other for having let each other down.” Then he named a replacement manager on the spot. That was Steve Jobs irreplaceable charismatic …show more content…
First Tim Cook is not a leader he is a manager. Therefore he has the mentality of a leader. The primary difference between leader and a manager is that a leader is concerned with doing the right thing, while a manager is concerned with doing things right. A great example a leader would say, “What should we be doing?” while a manager would say, “How can we do what we’re already doing better?” Although they are really different Tim Cook was able to keep the company a float when Steve Jobs had to take many medical leaves. Time Cook is demanding, and is an accomplished manager who knows how to execute and get things done. Also, Cook worked with Steve Jobs for many years, and therefore would know what Steve Jobs would say and want. Although many say that they would not make Tim Cook CEO. I think that what better then Tim Cook, because they knew each other. They spend time together, developing many products and only Tim Cook would know what Steve would do. This particular bond no replacing CEO would have. The only thing that Time Cook would have to do is find someone with innovating ideas to replace his