Soft And Hard Paternalism Essay

Great Essays
The difference between soft and hard paternalism is that soft paternalism is overriding the preferences of a person who is not autonomous, or acting in a way that is not fully voluntary. Whereas, hard paternalism is overriding the preferences of a person who is competent with respect to the issue on hand. An example of paternalism is the safety of an individual’s height regulation to be permitted to ride a roller coaster. This is an example because height regulation interferes with the individual’s will or desire to ride the rollercoaster, but has to obey the safety regulations in order to protect the individual’s well-being. Safety regulation to prevent harm is classified as negative paternalism. An example of positive paternalism is when a blood transfusion is given to a patient without his/her consent because medical judgments advise that he/she will not survive the effects of a necessary surgery without such treatment. This is an example of positive paternalism because the medical judgement is seeking to promote good.
There has been many cases in the medical context that strike whether the case shows
…show more content…
In order to make an autonomous decision, the patient needs to think rationally and be fully competent but some people are put in critical situations that does not allow them to have full competence. In high stress environments, judgements can be filled with emotions from fear and pain creating no safety net to agree on the best possible outcome. In order to do so, medical paternalism is exercised because there needs to be an understanding between the doctor and patient. The physician is there to advise the patient to ultimately make the best decision regarding their own care. Preserving an individual’s life is the best interest of a physician therefore, the physician is looking out for the patient’s best

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The conversation often returns to the fact that no human can 100% of the time predict the outcome of the patient - because there are the scenarios where a patient in a coma miraculously returns to leading an independent life. While this situation can occur, it is very unlikely. The thought of having someone else make medical decisions on my behalf because I am incapable makes me uneasy. While I have seen situations where medical paternalism seems necessary, specifically with mental health patients, I have seen scenarios where medical paternalism…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There are two standards adopted for making decisions on behalf of incompetent patients which are ‘best interests’ (objective) and ‘substitutive judgement’ (subjective). ‘Best interests’ (objective) is where a decision maker must choose the treatment that would be the most beneficial for the patient. This standard is mainly used for those who have never been competent but it is sometimes applied in emergency situations. Compared to ‘substitutive judgement’ (subjective), it is a condition where the decision maker must provide the treatment that the patient would have chosen if he was still competent. This standard is mainly used for those who were once competent but are no longer.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Test Item #2: The definition of the word autonomy means to be self-determined or to have free will. Patients, who are competent and are of an appropriate age, all have the ability to be autonomous when it comes to making decisions about their healthcare.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Such decisions regarding patients with severe and deteriorating illness should be processed with respect to the patient’s condition becoming worse with time. Having an ethics board or a medical community to alleviate the pressure of a single doctor making a decision for a patient who is not able to act autonomously would allow for a treatment plan to be determined earlier. In Mary’s case, the court ruling prevented the doctor’s from acting to save her…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Doctor’s responsibilities are to help the patient to get them well and make them healthy and sound. But Some of the procedure which can be denied by the doctor because of its negative effect on patient. A doctor may refuse a patient’s request provided the refusal leaves the patient no worse off than the patient would have been had the patient never met that doctor in the first place. Even though sometimes, Doctors have more objections to filling patient request for certain procedures or objections may be on the medication that patients are having. When a doctor tries to figure out what is best for the patient, they must find out in both way how it is going to affect the patient or not but more consciousness is issue when someone comes to the…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A conflict between a physician and patient on the course of treatment is a common topic that arises in bioethical conversation. This case explores the topic of paternalistic choices dealing with patient autonomy and when it is ethically reasonable for a physician to intervene and decide as to whether an individual is competent to make decisions about their own care. The patient in the case, Mr. Howe was asked to make a lifesaving medical decision while in duress and not fully understanding the procedure and the potential outcome if he refused. In this case I believe the physician made the correct decision to intubate Mr. Howe against his explicit instructions not to. The physician made a determination that the patient was not accurately expressing his wishes as if he was of sound mind.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our community should fear this, because individauls should have a choice when experiencing an abundance of pain. When patients decide that this is their time, the nurses or doctors should not be held accountable for patients’…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Autonomy and Nonmaleficence are both important ethical concepts in healthcare. In this paper, I will discuss how Beachamp and Childress, authors of Biomedical Ethics, define these concepts. I will also discuss some possible controversies that can arise according to their definition, as well as state which concept I feel is most important in healthcare. Next, I will cover one aspect of the concept that I think should be changed and one that I think should stay the same. Finally, I will state to what degree that I am satisfied with the authors’ definition of the concept that I have deemed to be of higher importance in the healthcare setting.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The aim of this essay is to discuss and assess a given case scenario where, the chosen patient admitted with acute headache and vomiting with intermittent confusion. This essay will define clinical judgement and decision-making; discuss importance of decision-making process in the assessment of patient’s care. It will also mention some of the theories about clinical decision-making in nursing practice and explain Tanner’s 2008 clinical judgement model that will apply in critically reviewing patient’s complex needs and assessing care plan and interventions. Further, this essay will demonstrate how effective sharing decision-making might enhance patient’s recovery, prevent deterioration. There also NHS mantra “no decision about me without me”…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages

    If these either of these two physicians do not find the patient to be mentally fit of making such decisions, they will refer them to a specialist to undergo a separate examination of their psychological well being. It is also the responsibility of both physicians to educate the patient of alternatives such as continuing treatment, pain medications or management options, and other such medical care. ("State-by-State Guide"). This information is to educate the patient on other options, but not force them into continuing treatment if they do not wish…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The refusal of observations by John could potentially place his health at risk by preventing early detection of deterioration, this left the MDT with a moral dilemma. When discussing ethical dilemmas it was important in John’s case to involve all members of the MDT. Rich and Butts (2014) suggest that ethical decisions should involve all healthcare professionals in a patients care intervention. Similarly Finlay (2008) encourages the involvement of the patient in discussing ethical problems along with the healthcare professionals (in Ellis, 2015).…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethical principles are not laws, but guiding principles about what is good and what is bad, that should direct doctors and other health care professionals in their work and decision making. Issues arising over end-of-life care involving decisions that affect the nature and timing of an individual's death raise difficult ethical conflicts for all concerned and can be a source of discord between health professionals within a team, health professionals and family members, or between different family members. Ethical dilemmas arise when there is a perceived conflicting duty to the patient, such as a conflict between a duty to preserve life and a duty to act in a patient's best interests, or when an ethical principle such as respect for autonomy conflicts with a duty not to…

    • 3174 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clinical decision making was initially defined by Benner, Tanner, and Chelsa (1996) as deliberate and conscientious, using ones intuition and a holistic approach to directly affect patient outcomes. Tanner later identified clinical decisions as being complex, dynamic decisions that are affected by the decision maker’s knowledge and experiences (2000). Tanner (2005) also disagrees with critical thinking and…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our core duty is to heal not judge. Not only is it important for us to be non-judgmental and empathic, we also need to advice the family members of the sufferer to follow suit. Sometimes it is our discomfort that makes us appear abrupt when dealing with a patient.…

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite what many might think, a patient 's right to refuse medical treatment has a very important meaning in the lives of many. People who have medical complications must learn to work with doctors and or surgeons in hospitals. With having the right to refuse medical treatment patients feel as if they have more power over their own health and future. Even though surgeons are qualified in making medical treatment decisions, patients should have the right to refuse medical treatment options. Patients should have the right to consider all medical options based on risk factors, success and effectiveness, and their living-will.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays