In the modern world, technology develops so rapidly; more and more technologies have been discovered, which make it possible that many practical applications are being used in the natural world. Due to the success in using application, human science has become the preferred means of collecting, evaluating, and organizing knowledge. This probably explains why science can be used to measure any assumptions or commitments. However, there are still conflicts between competing visions of truth through scientific practitioners, for example, between its theological competitors.
In the earlier days, people had a desire to explain the preconceived notion by linking natural phenomena and mythology, and religion and philosophy they observed. Another way to explain these phenomena, scientists systematically observed them and testing their ideas of modern science. …show more content…
Based on the observation, the inquirers craft a hypothesis to explain their views. Ideally, a scientific experiment tests the hypothesis to try to control the results of experimental variables; there is only a single element in a time of change in the case of the experiment so that the results will be based on the effect of this single variable that can be measured or otherwise observed. And analysis of experimental results show that the null hypothesis may be mistaken, and thus, in this case, it is discarded and replaced the hypothesis development and testing. In the case of a hypothesis that is not refuted by the results, it may form the basis for the theory to explain this phenomenon. Experimental science has placed the importance of the publication, they may be re-created by other researchers to prove the consistency of the rights of observation so that they might further refine the