In fact, a certain kind of feeling is regarded as the Hallmark of romantic love and its president or absence is decisive” (Wagoner pg52). Romantic love is about the chase and adventurous undertakings of a passionate life of romance opposed to a prudent life. With romantic love it is really in love with the search or chase and it has to hit some unperceived possibility in which romantic love dwindles when lovers finally get together. Romantic love in this aspect is different from moral love. Moral love with Duty allows love between one another, in which they can come into existence and the commitment of the moral lover would be followed by the Beloved and it becomes a joint effort. In this love promises of affection is not as important as the Vows of loyalty. Vows are more important than promises, promises are meant to be broken, unlike vows that are meant to be forever. With Romantic love its being in love with the idea of love. “This Love sees Duty as an imposition on us that limits our freedom and destroys our love” (Wagoner, pg74). Unlike romantic love, moral love See 's Duty not as an imposition but a choice, when you enter into a duty bound relationship is a new beginning in which you can become real lovers. Knowing that romantic love is essentially impossible love, based on distance it’s a form of doomed love, however it gets its passion from the distance and the doom. Romantic love then ends when marriage happens, romantic love disappears. Moral love never ends it 's a forever, it 's a choice that is made freely by the effort and will to stay committed. “The Beloved overtime in which a relationship, a personal identity and a history is been made. The gift to the Beloved is the gift of consistency, of absolute Fidelity and loyalty. then you can convert unaccountability and unpredictability freedom into
In fact, a certain kind of feeling is regarded as the Hallmark of romantic love and its president or absence is decisive” (Wagoner pg52). Romantic love is about the chase and adventurous undertakings of a passionate life of romance opposed to a prudent life. With romantic love it is really in love with the search or chase and it has to hit some unperceived possibility in which romantic love dwindles when lovers finally get together. Romantic love in this aspect is different from moral love. Moral love with Duty allows love between one another, in which they can come into existence and the commitment of the moral lover would be followed by the Beloved and it becomes a joint effort. In this love promises of affection is not as important as the Vows of loyalty. Vows are more important than promises, promises are meant to be broken, unlike vows that are meant to be forever. With Romantic love its being in love with the idea of love. “This Love sees Duty as an imposition on us that limits our freedom and destroys our love” (Wagoner, pg74). Unlike romantic love, moral love See 's Duty not as an imposition but a choice, when you enter into a duty bound relationship is a new beginning in which you can become real lovers. Knowing that romantic love is essentially impossible love, based on distance it’s a form of doomed love, however it gets its passion from the distance and the doom. Romantic love then ends when marriage happens, romantic love disappears. Moral love never ends it 's a forever, it 's a choice that is made freely by the effort and will to stay committed. “The Beloved overtime in which a relationship, a personal identity and a history is been made. The gift to the Beloved is the gift of consistency, of absolute Fidelity and loyalty. then you can convert unaccountability and unpredictability freedom into