Positional Power Vs Personal Power

Improved Essays
There are essentially two primary sources of power: positional power and personal power. As the name implies, positional power means that the leader’s power only comes from their title or position in management within an organization. Personal power, on the other hand, is a result of the leader’s individual influence over others. Personal power is basically a form of earned power in that is gained through the leader’s actions or behaviors toward others, as well as their work. However, the biggest difference between these two sources of power is that personal power also is given to a leader directly by their followership, while positional power is only in accordance with the individual’s official position or title.
Aside from having two separate
…show more content…
A study by Taucean, Tamasila, & Negru-Strauti (2016), for example, suggests that expert and referent power are still the most prevalent types of power used in modern organizations. Furthermore, this study also determined that only 3.8% of employees report their leaders or managers as having any source of high power or influence within the organization. Nevertheless, there are a number of situations in which each type or source of power may be applicable and/or best suited for the given …show more content…
Therefore, one of the best ways to gain personal power is by building positive relationships with others. For instance, one can gain more personal power by improving either the referent power or connection power. A leader may seek out relationships with managers higher up in an organization or with managers in different organizations in order to gain access to the tools or resources that may help the team reach their organizational objectives or goals, which ultimately helps both the leader and the organization in return. A perfect example of this type of power is the relationship between Banfield Pet Hospital and PetSmart. Although the two companies share a single building, they actually are two completely separate businesses since different corporations own them. However, when I was working as a hospital manager for Banfield, I specifically went out of my way to develop a working relationship with both the managers and the associates of PetSmart because I knew they had an integral part in the success of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Decisions making needs to be understood because of the fact that bad decisions can be made if the people do not have the right knowledge. The people also need to be willing to participate during the election times. Majoritarian democracy is more centralized, meaning that a small group is able to help aid in the mechanisms of majority rule. Pluralistic is in the far spectrum; completely opposite of majoritarian. It does not require that every citizen knows the ways of the democracy, that it is it relies heavily on the interests’ groups, mainly that groups leader.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Finally, the most distinct difference in Locke’s theory is the type of leader that rules the people. Instead of a sovereign commonwealth, the rulers appointed by the people remain accountable to them as the rulers lead their government. If they fail to do so, the people have a right to dissolve the government. Therefore, the rulers’ power is not absolute but invested and conditional to the…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An autocratic leader may resort to force, manipulation, or even threats to achieve their desired results. Most subordinates would not have a lot of positive things to say about autocratic leaders. This leadership style can create a lot of stress and create a very unpleasant work environment for the subordinate. The communication of this leadership style is very direct, they usually instruct their subordinates of exactly what they want done. This type of leader response to…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The general will benefits everyone in society and takes the publics view into consideration. Voting in the government and assembly of people is a criterion of the general will. It requires you to perform a duty in public affairs and a true government can only exist if all of its members contribute. Rousseau believes that the government should have minimal power, while the members of society influence what occurs. The general will “is always constant, unalterable, and pure: but it is subordinate to other wills that prevail over it.” Since a monarchy is based on the private interest of the ruler, it may be difficult to identify the general will in that society.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Autocratic Power

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The reasoning for why most governments around the world are autocratic is for power. Most governments want complete and total control because it benefits them. An oligarchy is when a few rules over many, an aristocracy has to do with class ranking, having high society making decisions for the people, and totalitarian is having the government have total control and dictation over the people. Countries that use autocratic governments presume that people are not very intelligent and astute to make the best decisions for the country. Those governments like to have the privilege of choosing who gets what, when ,and how.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is a common misconception that a government automatically carries out the role of leadership in a country due to its control, but this brings in to question what the role of the government actually is and what constitutes effective leadership. What determines the success of a government and how far does effective…

    • 1854 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Walmart Culture Analysis

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Wal-Mart Culture Wal-Mart attempts to have a people and group based organizational culture. They want employees to enjoy working at Wal-Mart and working together. It is important for Wal-Mart so that employees feel as though they make a difference and care about the business. It is also important to make Wal-Mart an enjoyable workplace to make up for the low wages and lack of benefits. It also important to garner positive attitudes from employees as it helps prevent unionization.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical Relativism

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Alexandra Puleo Having so much power to control resources and the ability to move production across countries, social responsibility should coincide with that. Businesses in these poor nations should give back what they can, being that these places and people are helping them grow their business and increase profit. Their business decisions should result in good faith and moral reasoning. It should be in their best interest to give back to the countries that allow them to prosper. Just by treating their employees as human beings, they can enhance the welfare of the communities they are in.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This not only eroded their support base, but also overemphasized their coercive functions……The basis of any traditional leader’s authority; it is this characteristic which differentiates traditional leaders from all other leaders in any society”. (Keulder, n.d., p.2) As you can see that a traditional leader is a person that is more worried about mainly their organization and not the people who are working for the organization. It’s nothing wrong with being about the organization constantly but you want to be concern about the employees…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Corporate Culture

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Companies should define corporate culture because it matters the most; it exercises the same powerful influence on personal character. Leaders developed at companies with solid corporate cultures have certain characteristics that distinguish them from the rest. Whether an organizational culture is strong or weak, it influences the leadership styles of employees more than any other facet of their jobs. This unanticipated power of corporate culture on leadership styles have proven to be both a blessing and curse for many companies as they too deal with human resource and strategic issues. It is important to know exactly what you want your corporate culture to be based on because it will make it easier to analyze the different leadership styles of employees as well as evaluate how tolerant the company is towards conflicting styles when engaged vital hires or mergers and acquisitions (Kell, & Carrott, 2005).…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays