Difference Between North And South

Great Essays
Another difference the south and the north had was slavery. As the nation grow there needed to be a way to equity of power among the state that had slaves and the states that were free. After the great compromise of 1787 there was another compromised call the Missouri compromised. The compromised enforced that every free or slave states to be qual. But, Maine and Missouri which were slave states then wanted to come to the north to be a free state. This became a big concern because it would make the balanced 11 to 11 free and slave state would be unequal. And, even if they wanted it wouldn’t be accepted. So congress made Maine only a free state because the state didn’t have any slaves unlike Missouri who had like ten thousand of slaves already. …show more content…
After many years of fighting over the spread of slaves with the Missouri compromise. This situation emerged again. After the united state won the Mexican war they gained more land so now the question was whether it should let slaves in and be a slave state or be free.Because of their involvement in the Mexican war the south now wanted slave laws. In 1850many congress leaders like Henry clay, john c. Calhoun, DanielWebster, William H. Seward, Stephen A. Douglas, and Jefferson Davis came up with a compromise. Some of the most important bills that made the compromise were. The first bill was that California would be a free state. The 2nd that the new territory gained from Mexico, like New Mexico and Utah had permission to decide whether they wanted to become a slave state or not as long as the votes were fair. the 3rd bill was To make Texas give up clamming new Mexico instead they would be given ten million dollars to pay off the money they owe Mexico. The 4th billwas to abolish the slave trade in the capitol of the country. The 5th bill was to make the fugitive slave act stronger.Even though the compromise did solve some of the issues regarding slaver and territories that south and the north had but it didn’t solve all of the problems. But, both the north and the south did gain a thing or two from these new bills that were passed. For mostly the south because this new compromise made the fugitive slave act a …show more content…
In 1854 senator dougless proposed that he wanted for Nebraska to decide if they wanted to become a slave territory and make a railroad from all the way from Illinois through Nebraska. Douglass idea was to divide the territory into two so he could gain the south support. So he decides the citizens who have the most power should decide whether they wanted their territories to become aslavestate or not. This brought extreme criticism from the Whigs party and the northern democrat, who wanted to keep the Missouri compromise line. Aftermonths of debating it was made into a law. The act separated Nebraska and Kansas. This act was to reverse the Missouri compromise of 1820 which banned slavery to enter the north latitude of 36-30. After the act was passed, people who supported slavery and those who were against slavery moved to Kansas to influence of the result of the first election. But those who favored slaver ended up being charged of fraud. As more people came in to Kansas the violence got worsen. In 1856 anabolitionist name john brown who wanted to end slavery. He started by kidnapping five proslavery advocates and freed they slaves and killed the slave owners. But he got captured and got killed. As the fight continued between both sides two hundred more settlers were killed and earned the name bleeding Kansas. The fight didn’t stop yet so president franklin pierce that supported the pro slavery people sent them

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The great compromise allowed both large and small states agree to the constitution without the congress having power. The small population states wanted congress with an equal representation from all states. But the lager populated wanted a congress, representation, and also the number of residents of each state (Doc 4&6). That wasn't the only problem that was going on, between the northern and the southern states their was the three-fifths compromise. The three-fifth compromise was a dispute over if slaves should be counted for as a person or not.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Representative James Tallmadge even tried to propose an amendment which would essentially end slavery, during the time the Missouri request but the effort was defeated. The debate whether Missouri should be a slave or free state occurred for over a year. Northerners argued that Congress than had the power to prohibit slavery while the Southerners said they should have the freedom to choose whether the state should be slave or not. Though after a lot of debate they were soon able to come up with a compromise. The first part of the compromise was Missouri was admitted as a slave state while Maine was a free state.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise divided the nation into two separate parts, free or slave states. Popular sovereignty allowed the states to choose whether or not they would be free. As read in the text, “What then we do insist on, is, not to extend slavery, but that we shall not be prohibited from immigrating with our property, into the Territories of the United States” (Document 8). The South wanted to bring slavery with them and believed they had the right to do so. Although, in the North it was decided that slavery would be abolished and they would all be free states.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an era where slavery was viewed as a profitable and reputable source of wealth, income, power, and an economic driving force, divisions amongst opinions added fuel to the flame for an unavoidable conflict to ignite. The Missouri Compromise came about for views, even within a time with which like-mindedness was prized and raised to the highest of glories on a pedestal, vastly varied on the issue of slavery and its seemingly rather loosely tied boundaries. With two opposing sides, the North for the removal of slavery and the South in favor of its continued existence -- territorial issues were heavy on the mind. Though often revered as being a more verbal form of compromise that laid out specific boundaries within the states, or two states…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry Clay came up with the Compromise of 1850, and it was passed with the help of Senator Stephen Douglas. This compromise allowed Utah to become either a free or slave state depending on popular sovereignty, banned slave markets from Washington D.C., and allowed the Tougher Fugitive Slave Act to pass. It was a considerably even win for all, since both the northerners and southerners got a piece of what they wanted. The dispute over slavery in new territories was settled yet again for that time…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Between the years of 1820-1860, there were a few disagreements with many American citizens. In 1820 the New Louisiana territory was known as a free state because of the Missouri Compromise. This Compromise sounded really promising to many slaves, but others disagree with it because many American citizens relied on these slaves. Later, other states were being known as Free states which made some American angry because they couldn’t have any slaves of their own, depending on where they live.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois was the man who decided to put this act into effect. At the time, the Missouri Compromise was in effect that stated that no slave territories be added into the Union above the 36o30’ line, which Kansas and Nebraska both were above, but anything below that line may be added in as a slave stateZ. Senator Stephen Douglas, a Democrat, stated in the act that the people of the territory were allowed to vote on the subject of slavery in their territory. Douglas, who was a pro slavery senator as most Democrats were, was all in favor of this act that completely disregards the terms and conditions of the Missouri Compromise. On the other hand, many of the Northern abolitionists at the time disagreed completely with the idea because of the fact it would allow slavery into territories it should not. This is a strong instance in which the country was divided into north and south based on the argument of slavery in new territories.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bleeding Kansas was a series of violent political acts brought on by the anti-slavery citizens and Border Ruffians (pro-slavery activists from Missouri, who crossed the state border into Kansas Territory to force the acceptance of slavery) during the popular sovereignty voting day. Bleeding Kansas consisted of many openly violent acts that threatened to tear the nation apart, including the Charles Sumner-Preston Brooks event. This event highlighted the intensity of the growing split between the North and South views on slavery and was yet another event that seemed to push the divided country even further away. This event consisted of Brooks beating Sumner to death with a cane after Sumner spoke openly about “black power” and the abolition of slavery. Another openly violent attack that attracted much attention was that of John Brown.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People owned slaves, so owners could do what they wished to them. Because they could not resolve these issues, the new government decided on a series of compromises to make both the southern and northern states…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Two years later, the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed by President Fillmore. This act was much more isolating, splitting the Democratic Party according to sectional interests and increasing the Republican Party. Other than that, it was basically the same as the Compromise of 1850. The struggle between the North and South fighting over Kansas led to people soon flooding into Kansas to fight about slavery, which leads to the “Crime against Kansas”, also known as one of the most famous political historical events. (Senator Charles Sumner talks smack about Preston Brooks relative, and Brooks beats him with a…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 brought Missouri into America as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Everything above the Louisiana Purchase Boundary line, with the exception of Missouri, banned slavery. This action resulted in maintaining an equal representation for both the North and the South in the Senate. Following this, the Compromise of 1850 allowed California to be admitted as a free state, however popular sovereignty would be used in the land of the Mexican Cession. This caused controversy within the states.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Passed by Congress in may of 1854, the Kansas Nebraska Act may be the most significant of the Pre-Civil War compromises. It admitted the Kansas and Nebraska as states, but rather than decide whether the territories would become slave or non-slave states based on their location in relation to the 36’ 30° line, they were allowed to choose for themselves. Kansas and Nebraska were not the only ones allowed to decide though, each territory was allowed to choose for itself if it would be a slave or non-slave state. This allowing of territories to choose slave or non-slave is called popular sovereignty. In popular sovereignty the people of the territory vote to decide if they will become a slave state or a non-slave state.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These are not the only compromises for the constitution, and all of them were major enough to have to been discussed at the convention, these are just some of the few that were part of the bigger picture we…

    • 1006 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When comparing the North and South, there aren’t many similarities. Both believed the exact opposite on many different topics. These include topics of economics, social, military, and political ideas. At the end of the Civil War, the rural South and urban North were able to come together as a single and strong nation.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays