Difference Between Morality And Legality

Improved Essays
The difference between morality and legality is can be described in a few ways, while still having a close relationship between the two. In short, the difference is that legality or “Law” is described as absolute rules prescribed by government representatives. Laws are designed to regulate behaviors of individuals and to specify what exactly is illegal. The purpose of morality can be seen as to ensure the honesty of an individual’s conscience. The purpose of the law is to ensure the common good, not the individual good, or to protect social living. Morality is described as personal views by someone on whether something is right or wrong. There is often a close relationship between the two in that laws often represent the majority societal …show more content…
For example, it isn’t so much a law now but back in the day slavery was very immoral and violated my sense of justice a lot. Many laws back in history violated many people’s moral judgement which takes me back to saying how laws change with change in societal views, such as slavery. There are also Some Laws today that I don’t necessarily agree with or that violate my morality. One example is the death penalty. That violates my morality because I find taking someone’s life whether what they did was wrong or right I find very unjust and very immoral. Another Law I personally consider unjust or immoral but others might not, called the “Zoning Law.” This law pretty much regulates how the landowners use their land. These laws are mostly used for regulating land so more central business districts, and offices can be built. This is very immoral in the obvious way of violating human rights to private property, and in a way it just makes the land owned by the government or city not the landowner. The landowner buys the land with their own money and hard work then the government just does what it wants anyway, making this law very immoral to me. Another example, from the book, that caught my attention was the Lester Zygmanik case. This case is unique to me because a loved one of his family had asked him, out of love, to put him out of his suffering. In this particular case I think that this is ok. His brother was suffering, was not happy, and asked him to do it, he didn’t just shoot him out of nowhere for no reason. I can see why others would disagree but if it is out of love and you are asked beforehand by that person to do it so they cannot live in misery anymore then I don’t consider that to be Murder but an example of Euthanasia. Euthanasia is still considered illegal but I disagree and I don’t believe they should be punished. Another example I disagree

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For instance, In Law 21: If a man broke into a house they shall be stab. Also, In Law 23: If the robber is not caught, the people who got robbed should declare whatever he has lost before a god. In Law 48: If a man borrowed money to plant his fields and storm has flooded his field, the man doesn't need to pay back the creditor. In Law 53,54: If a man had opened his trench for irrigation and the waters have flooded his neighbor’s field, the man must restore the crops and he has caused to be lost.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you ever wonder where our laws came from or who came up with them? Well the king of Babylon Hammurabi created the first set of laws. Thanks to that ancient guy all nations have laws. Laws are important to society because without them i'm pretty sure our country's population wouldn't be as high as it is. So in order to have a modern society laws are important.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The laws modern society has in its legal system are more or less directly related to the moral principles of its people. Actions such as theft, murder and rape are unanimously immoral, which in turn makes the action illegal. However, some immoral actions do not have a legal counterpart, which could be due to a disagreement between two sides of an ethical dilemma. When this happens, legal action might occur in order for one side to transform their position on the matter into law. Sometimes these legal controversies can be so complex that it must keep going up the judicial system until the highest authority determines the absolute verdict.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For a law to be moral there must be some guidelines to what is justified as morally right. A way for justifying by what is morally right is religion. Religion is a good example of deciding if a law is morally right or lawful because each religion has it owns set of moral in which they see is the proper/peaceful way to serve their god or deity. An unjust law is usually a law that has one benefactor to it or double standard. An example of a current law to this day is unjust is the outlaw of marijuana.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Laws of Morality. The book The Bean Trees by Barbara Kingsolver tackles some large important ideas. One of the most impactful ideas Kingsolver looks at is the idea of a person's moral code being more important than the law. Some examples of when this idea is brought up are Mattie helping refugees from Guatemala and El Salvador, Taylor’s favor for Estevan and Esperanza, and Estevan and Esperanza's favor for Taylor.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality and the Law Children have to have rules they might not like them because rules represent restrictions and consequences. The eventual goal is for kids to know about discipline as kids, they learn about the right and wrong, so when growing up they will be in charge of their own decisions and choices. People know that laws need to follow due to be the right thing to do. If there would not be no laws in society, then even the simple things could become a big problem. Laws are important because they are principles for what is allowed even breaking those laws can be justifiable and acceptable when the law itself is unfair and unjust.…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Coker V. Georgia (1977)

    • 2350 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Ethics and Terrorism Investigations Ethics and laws are dependent upon one another. Society knows what is right and what is wrong based on the laws of that community; however, laws are usually defined within narrow parameters. Not every application of the law may be the correct course of action which requires the ethical deliberation of all facts and circumstances to ensure justice is served. The question that needs to be answered in any ethical dilemma is, “Who will be harmed and who will benefit” (Skeen 2015)? According to British Philosophers John Mill and Jeremy Bentham, the answer to the question lies in the Utilitarian Theory that “Actions are right to the degree that they tend to promote the greatest good for the greatest number” (as cited by Kay, n.d.).…

    • 2350 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The circumstances in which it would be morally permissible to break the law depends on the validity of the law in the situation. For some things, such as jay walking when a car isn't coming, are acceptable as breaking said law would not pose a risk to the rule the law wished to enforce. Even if you jaywalked in this situation, it doesn't pose any risk to those around you and the action doesn't mean to undermine the validity of the law. There are cases where laws are unjust though, and to break them held protect another from suffering the same injustice. Martin Luther King, in his letter, states a similar idea where he believes a set of laws to be unjust so he resorts to acting in ways to undermine said laws.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people would agree that laws are something that were created to help people. Most of the help is figuring out who is right, how to handle something, or rules to follow (Behl, 2016). Hardly anyone would argue that this is a bad thing, until the law itself breaks the rules. Many laws can, in fact, contradict themselves. An example of this is the juvenile justice system and being able to wave the juvenile to adult court.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jean Valjean Arrest

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Your legal rights are the rights you have that are written in document form that are backed by the law while your moral rights are the rights you ought to have through the code of ethics/morals. Simple examples could be the following: you have the legal right to an education and everyone has the moral right to being treated equally. It is possible to relate many characters to these differences, but in my eyes, I see Jean Valjean as being a worthy example of such. Jean Valjean’s reason for arrest shows us the conflict between the two rights - it is illegal to steal something however everyone has the moral right to a happy and healthy life where you should be allowed to eat food. The reason Javert decided that suicide was his fate was because…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Laws sets a barrier to which we can make decisions on our own and pushes us to our own boundaries. In particular this relates to me because there was this moment in my life where a law limited my decision making. I wanted to make the decision to drink alcohol to have…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If society feels that a law needs to be established, than society will establish it. I believe that this too, applies to our society. We dislike murder, so what do we do? We make murder illegal. The same thing applies to seemingly insignificant things, like traffic violations.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Morality cannot be legislated, but behavior can be regulated. Judicial decrees may not change the heart, but they can restrain the heartless” (Martin Luther King Jr.). This quote by King describes how morality cannot ultimately be dictated by laws, but behavior can be. True morality comes from the heart and laws won’t cause someone have a morality change. Moral behavior is very often influenced by both religion and laws in the way that religion can make people think they may be punished in the afterlife for certain actions, laws, and both religion and laws have things that are prohibited that really aren’t “wrong”.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As political philosopher Montesquieu puts it “the spirit of the law is justice. The letter must be broken at some points to achieve it.” Justice is defined in the dictionary as being consistent with what is morally right. Unfortunately, what is considered as legal is not always consistent with what is morally right. For sure, a huge amount of laws are made to ensure that people have their fundamental human rights, safety, equality and freedom.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There are a few differences between natural law and legal positivism. However, before diving into the differences, a definition for both the theories should be provided. Basically, a natural law is a law in which is derived from the validity of morality and reasoning. Natural law is believed to be served on the best interest of the common good as well. For legal positivism, it is viewed in the source of a law has no connection between reasoning and morality.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics