Difference Between Meno And Socrates

Improved Essays
Nguyen 1

Randy Nguyen

Ancient Philosophy

Rev. Joseph W. Koterski, S.J.

10/4/17

In Plato’s Meno dialogue, Meno starts off by asking Socrates what is virtue and if it can be taught or not. However Socrates questions Meno if he knew what the definition of virtue was, and mentions that virtue can’t be taught if you don’t know what virtue really is. Throughout the dialogue Socrates and Meno are debating how is Virtue obtained in a person, and they come up with three possible reasons that virtue can be obtained within the human soul, that it can be taught, and that it is the gift from the Gods. However In my view I believe that there should be one common or specific definition for virtue, rather than many examples or definitions that don’t define virtue at all, and we see this being debated by Meno and Socrates throughout the whole dialogue.
…show more content…
From the definition that Meno came up with on virtue, you can see that Socrates wasn’t really satisfied with it at all. For example Meno claimed that, “If you want a women’s virtue, that it easily described, she must be good housewife, careful with her stores and obedient to her husband. Then there is another virtue for another child, male or female and another for an old man, free or slave” (Greek Philosophy, 111). From this example Socrates understands what virtuous really is but not virtue in general. Socrates tends to question Meno’s knowledge on virtue, since Meno explains characteristics of virtuous rather than defining what virtue really

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    At certain point when Meno affirms that virtue is knowledge which can be taught, the Socrates disagree with his believe affirming that there is no one who is qualified to teach it, and that it is a Gift from God which cannot be taught to any person. It is worth noting…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue, to Socrates, is the act of doing good things and not wicked or shameful actions, which means happiness is achieved by doing good things This leads to his belief that achieving excellence, or good, will give you wealth and everything else that everyone considers happiness both as an individual and publicly (30b). I believe that this connects with the activities he does with his fellow citizens, because he wants to show them what…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “examined life is devoted to the knowledge and improvement of the soul and virtue“, (Apology, 39 a-f). Socrates believed that in order live a happy and fulfilled life, we mustn’t live in search of approval from others, but live a life in constant search of wisdom and virtue. However, what exactly makes someone a “seeker of wisdom”, or deems them virtuous? According to Socrates there is no direct answer. Of course one must be true to himself, however, that alone does not answer this question.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates acknowledged this definition as it provided a universal trait which could be applied to any action to determine whether such an action was pious. The definition however was invalid. This definition provided a contradiction between what is pious and impious. For Socrates this definition served no purpose in defining pious given that what might be loved by one god might be hated by another…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates and Thrasymachus’ Conception on Justice In Friedrich Nietzsche’s work, The Genealogy of Morality, he states that the existence of laws establishes what is just and unjust within a given society (Nietzsche 1280; sec 12). Thus, there does not seem to be anything explicitly virtuous for justice. In reference to the Republic, I will argue Socrates and Thrasymachus have different views on justice and will ultimately disagree with each other on Nietzsche 's conception of justice. Nietzsche’s entire work is trying to dissect morality from its origins.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is why Socrates’ states that virtue should be discussed everyday by any man as it is the greatest good to any man. “…I say that it is the greatest good for a man to discuss virtue everyday.” (Plato, The Apology, 38a). Perhaps one of the biggest virtues discussed in the Apology by Socrates, is the virtue of the soul. Socrates says “…for the unexamined life is not worth living for men…”…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue and knowledge can be learned, not from other but within one 's self. Plato did a demonstration using the theory of recollection and the…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Also if both Socrates and Meno are both ignorant about what virtue is, there is no way they could find what virtue is together without recruiting someone who does know what virtue is. Unfortunately…

    • 2140 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I will demonstrate how Socrates ' response to this question was successful in answering the paradox. Meno’s Paradox Before Socrates ' answer can be understood, Meno 's Paradox must first be introduced. Meno begins by asking whether virtue is…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    31). According to the philosopher, virtue is a ‘characteristic’ rather than as opposed to a ‘passion’ or ‘capacity’. This characteristic is determined by an individual’s choice. These choices must be determined in mean of wisdom and rationale, which is the implication in which it is labeled a virtue. In justification, an individual is permitted to act in accordance to a particular virtue that is most appropriate for the circumstances.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the beginning there was Philosophy; the never ending study of the “fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence” (Merriam-Webster). With this definition, one can begin to question the validity of all things in this fine world. When analyzing both, Plato’s Five Dialogues, and, Susannah Cahalan’s, Brain on Fire, you begin the journey of defining virtue. Virtue is a key term in the philosophical world; this is because virtue means to show high moral standards in righteousness, integrity, decency, and purity. Now, with cross-examination, these two works of art have clearly answered a fundamental question; what is virtue, and how is it carried out?…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Back in ancient Greece Aristotle theory of Virtue Ethics begged the question “what sort of person should I be?” (SL, 254) It’s no surprise this question still persists over two thousand years after his death. To this day Aristotelian virtue ethics remains prominent in ethical theories, all this time there have been objections to its theories but there must be something to these ancient ideas. Over the course of this paper I will explain virtue ethics as a whole and present an argument against virtue ethics and why virtue ethics has been able to withstand the opposing ideas.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s Gorgias, Socrates and Callicles engage in a debate about what it means to be happy and to live a flourishing life. According to Callicles, a person is happy and flourishing when he or she is living as ambitiously as he or she possibly can. Living the good life includes chasing one satisfaction after another and having a constant influx of pleasure. In contrast, Socrates emphasizes on the idea of eudaimonia, according to which a happy and flourishing person is one that lives an orderly life, in which the person maintains discipline and control over oneself.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Can Virtue Be Taught Essay

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates defines virtue as knowledge, and if virtue is a kind of knowledge then it can be taught. In Meno and several other dialogues, Socrates makes arguments on the subject of virtue. Of the many different arguments Socrates examines, he seems to focus the most on the way virtue is received, but more specifically if one is born virtuous, and if virtue could be taught. These different types of virtues are also known as moral virtue and intellectual virtue (Nicomachean Ethics). It is hard to say if one is born already a virtuous.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates’ discussion with Meno suggests that in order to gain knowledge one must first let go of any preconceived ideas and admit to our ignorance. Socrates evaluations of Meno’s attempts reveal that Meno does not know as much about the nature of virtue as he previously thought. In his first attempt he lists off different virtues that apply to different types of people: “ If you want the virtue of a woman, it’s not difficult to describe: she must manage the home well, keep the household together, and be submissive to her husband; the virtue of a child, whether boy or girl, is another thing altogether, and so is that of an elderly man – if you want that – or if you want that of a free man or a slave” (60-61). Socrates refutes this definition by pointing out that although Meno is able to give examples of what he believes are virtues, he fails to point…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays