Difference Between Mencianism And Mencius

Improved Essays
Human Nature
Are humans born good or evil? This is a question that there are many different answers to. Confucians, the founder of Confucianism, the official state religion of China for nearly two thousand years, had his own answer to this question, but it provided a somewhat vague explanation. Since his answer was very vague and indirect, Confucians were split on the question of human nature. Some like Mencius believed that humans are born good, and with the proper training, can become perfect. Others like Hsun Tzu had the belief that humans were inherently evil, but with strict discipline, they could be good, despite their natural inclinations.
I think Mencius in “Man’s Nature Is Good’ makes a very convincing argument for his belief on this question. In Mencius’s view, “humans are inherently good” (79). Mencius believed that people who are left to their original nature or that follow their gut feelings are able to do good. I agree that we are inherently good and that we are born with the
…show more content…
While debating whether humans have the knowledge of right and wrong without a choice, Kao Tzu uses an example of swirling water, and it flowing from east to west to prove his point that you do not a choice between good or evil. Mencius disagrees when he writes “It’s true that water doesn’t choose between east and west, but doesn’t it choose between high and low? Human nature is inherently good, just like water flows inherently downhill. There is no such thing as a person who isn’t good, just as there’s no water that doesn’t flow downhill” (79). Mencius continues to state, “think about water: if you slap it, you can make it jump over your head: and if you push it you can make it stay on a mountain. But what does this have to do with the nature of water? It’s responding to the forces around it. It’s like that for people too: you can make them evil, but that says nothing about human nature”

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Confucius’ mis-representation of the concept of chivalry portrays his lack of ethical understanding of the society around him. Certainly, Confucius’ and Lao Tzu’s ideologies have guided humanity’s roadmap since ancient history. Their long-lasting works have allowed people all over the world find the one truth that encompasses us all. The difference that promotes Lao Tzu’s teachings over Confucius, however, is the classification of people below or above us, the ultimate flaw in ethical…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Social Hierarchy of Inborn Traits: An Analysis of Cultivation of the Self and Innate Goodness of Human beings in Confucius, Mencius, and Xunzi This comparison analysis will define the social hierarchy of the cultivation of the self and the innate goodness of human beings as a point of conjecture in the writings of Confucius, Mencius, and Xunzi. The writings of Confucius define the social hierarchy of evil as an inborn trait, which must continually be cultivated by the wisest and strongest of people. In contrast to this, Mencius feels that human beings are innately good, but they must also continue to follow the living a good life through wisdom and self-development. In a similar way, Xunzi was not unlike Confucius in believing in the innate evil in humankind, yet he followed the similar process of…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever thought about why good people do bad things? Or how you think someone is a terrible person yet does someone good? When it comes to the behavior of people, no one can be completely good or completely bad, there are various situations in books and in real life that prove it. I believe it has to do with our perspective of how we feel or see ourselves.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No one is innately 'good' or 'evil', human nature is much more complex at its core. When the opportunity presents itself, one must decide whether or not to listen to the angel, a symbol of purity and hope, hovering over an individual's right shoulder, or the devious, conspiring devil on the left. However, one can make a bad decision, and remain pure. It is not the act itself that defines an individual as good or evil, it is the feelings that follow it. Therefore,…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Personally, I feel humans are inherently evil, but there is a small window with nurture where parents or guardians can alter the personality of the child for the better. In Psychology, you learn about the Nature Vs Nurture argument.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Confucius did not believe that humans were evil by nature, he did believe that China was becoming overrun with rude and dishonest people. Therefore, he believed that humans were disrespectful by nature, and should return to ethics and moral…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rougher Upbringing Study

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    People are born blank slates and are formed gradually into the person they become through personal experiences. A modern day philosopher named John Locke, states that a child’s life “is formed only through experience”. He believes that no matter how children are raised, it is the life experiences that actually influence their life more. This notion that people are not born to do terrible things, but maybe led down that dark path by things they live through. The website Live Science conducted a study that seems to support this thought.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn said, “the battleline between good and evil runs through the heart of every man.” Humans have a choice from the very start, to chose sides between good or evil. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn believes that the choice of humanity derives from the heart of all humans. What about human nature? Is it a choice?…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nature vs. Nurture via Frankenstein One’s true nature versus nurture upbringing has been a question long pondered before Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. A person is defined by nature and nurture. One does not outweigh the other. Many variables exist in the nature vs nurture debate. Human beings are not born evil any more than they can be bred to perform evil.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans are complex and simply using the religious derived definition of evil discounts, how complex humans are and removes the responsibility we have of our own actions as well as our social responsibility. It's a dangerous over-simplification to believe that some are innately ‘good’ while others are innately ‘evil’ or ‘bad.’ This is a misleading concept, ‘bad’ people commit crimes, and we should throw them away because there is no hope. We cage them and forget about them.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Humans weren 't born with strong souls; every challenge we face makes us stronger. While some challenges are more difficult than others, I believe that the majority challenges make us better people. I believe that God created humans like this so that we could eventually be the people He intended for us to be. If all humans were born good, how can we know what good truly is? In order for someone to know what good is, they have had to have experienced what bad is.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Are Humans Born Morally Bad, Amoral, or Morally Good? Introduction The argument about whether humans are born morally bad, morally neutral, or morally good has been controversial for many years, with different philosophers proposing dissimilar perspectives. Plato believes that humans are born morally good.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the contrary, Xunzi considered that people are born evil. His view of human nature is different from Mencius’ view and even his teacher, Confucius’ view. Even though two huge extremes developed from one teacher, both of them are important stream in philosophy and especially negative view of human nature of was a basis of…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    One can argue that man’s human nature is both inherently good and evil, but it is through the sin of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden that each generation born after them was no longer born without shame, which Hsun Tzu does a great job of showing how man’s nature is inherently evil. Hsun Tzu was a Chinese scholar who followed the Confucian belief who lived from 300-230 BCE. He wrote this piece of literature explaining how man is not born with an innocent or pure nature, meaning that in the eyes of God when we are born we are born sinful. If this was not the case, and Mencius was correct about humans being pure in nature then no one would have the urge to murder, steal or anything that we consider to be sinful today. However, this is not…

    • 1825 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each individual has a different understanding of what the word “bad” or “evil” mean. If one person believes that stealing is bad, another person might believe that stealing is a good thing if it serves the greater good, for example, Robin Hood. The words “bad” and “good” are subjective and can vary in people’s views. Yet, by looking at the world today, it is difficult to say that humans are naturally good. However, when a child is brought into this world, one tends to associate them with purity and innocence.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays