Difference Between Marxism And Communism

Great Essays
Although the leaders of the Bolshevik revolution aimed to create a communist society in the USSR based on Marxism, however due to several reasons, the society (and state) they formed was different from the one envisioned by Marx. Marxism, in essence, is Karl Marx’s political ideology whereas communism is a society (and a political system) based on that ideology. The research paper explores this thesis by a comparative analysis of Marxist doctrines and its application as carried out by Lenin and his successors in the ‘Socialist’ USSR. In the above context, central questions that would be addressed would revolve around whether the communists were able to establish a classless society in the Soviet Union? Was the formation of a communist society …show more content…
‘Socialism’ is a transitory stage between capitalism and communism. The ultimate aim of a socialist state is the formation of a communist society. The primary difference between socialism and communism is that the former is a dictatorship of the ‘proletariat’ while the latter is a classless society. Hence, there is a state, a political party and a controlled economy in a socialist state whereas a communist state is one where the state completely ‘withers away’ and a classless society is …show more content…
He regarded the modern state executive as, ‘“the committee for managing the common affairs of the bourgeoisie” (Marx 15) Hence, Marx envisioned a stateless society organized in such a way that every member of it can develop and use all his capabilities and powers in complete freedom and without thereby infringing the basic conditions of this society (Marx 37). Marx, however, approves of an intermediary stage between capitalism and communism i.e. Socialism. Marx says, “The development of the masses cannot he ordered by decree. It is determined by the development of the conditions in which these masses live, and therefore proceeds gradually (Marx

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Marxism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Communist Manifesto Marx explained the historical class struggles that each society has come across since the beginning of time. Class resemblances are usually, the oppressor and the oppressed on opposite sides and classes with various orders of complicated arrangements (p.15). Marx’s believed that his society has not left the class antagonism from earlier times such as the Ancient Roman’s, however, enforced new classes with new conditions and struggles for the oppressed individuals, in place of the old policies (p.15). In Communist Manifesto Marx noted the two classes of his society were the bourgeoisie and proletariats (p.16). Quite simply, the bourgeoisie were the capitalists who were the enforcers and owners of the properties in…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The first category is Reactionary Socialism. Reactionary Socialism has three subcategories: Feudal Socialism, Petty-Bourgeois Socialism, and German or “True” Socialism. The aim of all these Reactionary groups is stopping the rise of the bourgeois. The second category is Conservative, or Bourgeois, Socialism. This category represents the people who want to “redress social grievances in order to secure the continued existence of the bourgeois” (31).…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The theoretical implementations that surround the ideas of Communism suggest that the government has supreme authority through its total control of a nation's land and means of production. The communist ideals center around the standard of equality in terms of the social and economic factors of any society in the modern age. However, the theoretical ideals that surround the concept of Socialism focus more toward the social sector rather than the private means of economical production. These ideals continue through the use of moving more toward production planning rather than market forces and come to needing satisfaction rather than profit accumulation. However, these two ideas of economic standings possess differences in the terms of Socialism growing directly out of the branch of capitalism (the first form of a new society) and Communism being merely a further developed or higher staged branch of Socialism.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socialism Vs Capitalism

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism vs Socialism There are different types of economic systems the countries use to run their governments. Capitalism and Socialism are the most common systems adopted by the governments and generally these systems have been characterized to be the opposite of each other. On one hand, Capitalism is based on the premise that the means of productions or resources, in all of its forms, are owned by individuals, therefore the economy would depend on the profits of those individuals could generate, making this system dependable of the private sector. On the other hand, the Socialism is based on the principle that the sources are owned and controlled by the State or public and the government is in charge to make all the economic decisions…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An easy way of looking at it, communism is a more extreme form, of socialism. As socialism involves those in the community giving up some of their wealth to be distributed to level out the social class, while communism requires that everyone give up their individual property and everyone receive the same as everyone else to satisfy their needs. Another key difference between the two involves the projected fall of capitalism. According to the Communist Manifesto, Marx believed that the fall of capitalism would occur by a revolution from the middle-class (or bourgeoisie) after the exploitation they faced at the hands of the upper-class. Rather than believing in this violent demise of capitalism, socialist (as previously discussed) believe more in trying to narrowing the gap built between to social classes, instead of terminating them…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith Research Paper

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I hope this letter finds you well, and you are doing okay. I got your message about wanting to know about the relationship between the market, and the state. I am happy to tell you that I have researched it, and I can now discuss this topic for you. While doing my research for this topic, I came across articles by Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes. In short I have learned that the state should have some form of intervention in the markets.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This main contrast sets a myriad of opposite postures that have a socio-economic and political impact. For example, the capitalist system base individual prosperity on free market with a small government and the opposite, considers government controlled industries as a mean to social prosperity. While in capitalism companies are owned by the private sector; in socialism the government owns the companies. Individual freedom to property, competition and assets management contrasted by elimination of private property and government welfare programs that provide same social benefits. Capitalism can cause huge distance between the classes which can result in social uneasiness, while Socialism systems attempts to assure social equality.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Early modern writers as diverse as John Locke in his Two Treatises of Government and Karl Marx in Capital attribute inequality to the social dominance of one force such that it eclipses other forces’ abilities to function as they might otherwise; a ‘domination disrupts nature’ thesis. Both Locke and Marx identify money as one such dominating force. This dominance applies not only to money being the end of transaction, but also to the dominance of the means of transaction, with corresponding ramifications for the items being transacted. For example, Locke notes how the accumulation of wealth allows people to store more than they require, leaving relative deprivation in times of scarcity.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We have looked now at both socialism and capitalism and how they differ. There are not many similarities between the two except maybe that they both want to run a society in an efficient manner. They just have very different ways of going about it. For a socialist movement to take root in an otherwise capitalistic society the following would have to occur.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is also important for other competitors in this process. In a socialist system, people don’t need to compete for their development because everything belongs to the community; instead of this they compete for political power, which causes much instability in socialist countries. This harms the development of the countries, and it also helps explain why many capitalist countries are secure, such as the United States and Canada. On the other hand, socialism may be viewed as superior to capitalism because it seeks for social justice and promotes education. Socialism, a general term for the political and economic theory, advocates a system of collective or government ownership and management of the means of production and distribution of goods.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people view socialism as a term synonymous with communism. However, this is not the case; socialism is an economic system in which the state owns all means of production, as opposed to a complete governmental system, communism. Socialism is heavily contested between people with different economic ideologies; the policies chosen for implementation now will greatly affect the future, so people must learn to compromise. U.S.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socialism In America

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Merriam Webster the definition of socialism is, “a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies” (Merriam-Webster). In The United States of America the words “Communism” and “Socialism” are used interchangeably, and although they have similarities they are very different systems. Socialism involves more government involvement in order to regulate the economy and government to help the people more and to allow the socioeconomic system to lead more to the people and help lessen the societal classes. Socialism addresses many of the problems that affect capitalism such as multi billion dollar companies controlling or taking over one industry, and forcing competition to be defeated and crushed in order to be the richest and most powerful corporation. In…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socialism is a form of government not popular in America but is working in other countries. The Merriam- Webster dictionary describes it as a government that controls industries rather than companies and or individual people. (2015, Webster) Socialism politics and economics are a social system in which there is no private property. It is a system in which owned by stat and is a certain stage in-between capitalism and communism. Socialism is not what it used to be if it ever was the evil many believe to be.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1848, Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels published ‘The Communist Manifesto’ that was aimed at presenting the arguments, goals, and platform of Communism. The publication was a commissioned work that was intended to articulate the objective and platform of the Communist League, an international political party founded in 1847 in London, England. The authors point out the benefits of communism and the need for its application in the future. Besides, the manifesto was a proposal reading stabilization of the class structure in the society without conflict. The authors argue that historical developments have been impacted by the class struggles, with the rich battling with the poor and the exploitation of one class by another.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Analysing and comparing the positive and negative aspects of the theory as well considering its continuing relevance within modern society allows me to develop a greater understanding of how Marxism approaches International Relations. From my analysis throughout previous paragraphs it is clear that this approach has both significant strengths and weaknesses. Marx theory of class can be effectively and accurately applied to International Relations as a means of examining the ways in which class struggle is present within states and how this conflict affects relations between key actors within the International System. Although this aspect of analysis is strong, components of the Marxist approach of International Relations remain flawed, Marx pertains a predominantly economic focus towards International Relations often attracting criticism concerning how this approach leaves little regard for other aspects of analysis. This weakness is of genuine concern, as it is important to maintain a holistic view of the ways in which additional factors may affect international relations.…

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays