According To Kant What Is Good Essay

Great Essays
According to Kant, a good will is good not for the reason of its consequences, or the purpose of its action, and what it may achieve. If we are to take out of its con and pro, its value will still remain, and that indicated an action of good will is simply good, it’s an action of viture, and vuntilary. Kant talked about other goods that are desirable because their qualification, and the good consequences brings us pleasure and happiness. Although they may be good, but unlike good will they are not absolutely good. These goods, such as wealth, while it can bring happiness, but they can also become bad, depends on the motivation, wealth could bring greed, unlike good will, these are tools.
In the reading other than action done from act of duty, Kant also talked about people act on self-interest, and people has natural tendency to please others.
No, according to Kant, a dealer that would not overcharge, the
…show more content…
Kant said, “A counsel of prudence”, is prior, which is known by reason alone, actions that are taken for the reason we know they brings us happiness. Lastly, Kant said “a command of morality”, is law, which must be obeyed and most be followed. And they are the only law that is unconditional, objective necessity, and universally valid. Applying Kant’s first version of Categorical Imperative, which is act according to the maxim the you would wish all other rational people to follow, as if it were a universal law: (1) Suicide, the maxim of this man is committing suicide to his self-interest of free from suffering. If we were to apply this to universal law, everyone will commit suicide when they are experiencing pain. It is not a rational, logical reason to follow this law, because the motive of this man’s action is his self-interest of ending suffering, but our duty is take care ourselves, to maintain our

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s main idea is that the thought behind your actions is what determines if it’s wrong or right, not the outcome, he uses categorical imperative. So, the moral of your action is judged by the principal that provokes the action, not the outcome as I stated above. He calls these principles “maxim”. He says “the only acceptable maxim are those that can be defined as a universal law, because it is without exception” (pg.98). He uses an example of his view of morality of suicide.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Selfishness In Ishmael

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This attitude feeds into Kant’s theory that it’s “our good will to do things whether the…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people may think determining the morality of an action as an easy task, and fail to realize that it is no easy task. Every action is driven by other actions, and depending on the circumstances, an act may be moral in some cases and not in others. This is why Kant favors the Categorical Imperative when compared to other methods of determining morality. The Categorical Imperative does not deal with circumstances, instead it denotes an all-encompassing rule that, if obeyed, means actions would be moral no matter what the situation may be. He first describes the Categorical Imperative when he states, “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (Kant 14).…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Due to examples such as the 2003 War in Iraq by the US, it can be seen that not all motivations are pure. Kant then states a limitation that not all actions are performed completely out of good will, and only categorical imperatives, which are actions that are done just for the sake of being done, and therefore considered as a priori since it is a means and an end, are truly pure. This is agreeable, however, it must be noted that hypothetical imperatives can also have good will (i.e. lying in order to protect someone’s feelings), yet at the same time, categorical imperatives would be more reliable. He gives four examples of categorical imperatives. Adherence to the first principle, which says one should not kill himself, is a must in order for humans to remain in the world, in addition to the importance of life.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Grounding for the Metaphysics of Moral, Kant discusses the term of good will and further develops the nature of it. In the book, he gives several examples to illuminate human nature of good willing through the concept of duty, which is that duty is an action which we are force to perform out of respect for moral law. And there are three of the examples that clearly explain the terms. In the first example, the author states that a dealer shouldn’t overcharge an inexperienced purchaser in accordance with duty.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant supports the categorical imperative with three different rules, all of which convince me that we have moral duties to ourselves because these rules are in a sense applicable to everyday life. The three rules include the universal law, treat humans as ends in themselves, and act as if you live in the Kingdom of ends. Universal law is discussed first where Kant states, “There is only one categorical imperative. It is an act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant argues that duty is based solely on reason (Kant,81). Kant believes that the act of lying, murdering, robbery are the wrong action and we have a duty not to do these things. According to Kant, consequences are not what makes an act right, but the right action makes the act right. Also, our good motives or intentions will lead us to the good path without qualification. The Categorical Imperative is the supreme principle of morality.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Kant’s Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, moral worth is a key element to defining what makes a moral being. As per Kant, just reasonable creatures can be said to act ethically. The thinking for Kant is the same for all people; at the end of the day there is not a needy individual's reason versus a rich individual's reason. All people are equivalent as normal ethical beings. In this manner, if reason manages that one individual, in a specific circumstance, has an ethical obligation to complete a specific thing, at that point any individual, in that same circumstance, would similarly well have an obligation to do that same thing.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, this is where Kant’s categorical imperatives come into play. As stated before, the first is that we are to never treat people as a means. Secondly, we are to adhere to a maxim that can govern all people and eventually become universal law. There is an incredible difference between a categorical imperative and a hypothetical imperative. The difference is evident because to the Kantian, morality should be based on the categorical imperative, or something that is help to be good in any scenario at any time.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes Vs Kant On Morality

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Since I have I have deprived the will of every impulse that might arise for it from obeying any particular law, there is nothing left to serve the will” (Kant, 1998, pg14)One is able to be good without the need of qualification of being good. Human nature and a…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant’s theory of good will could say we should not base our actions off of what produces the most utility for ourselves in fact we should not even focus on ourselves we should focus on the moral duty that we all have. We could hate doing our moral duties; however, it is our moral duty to complete these…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The good will in the act of duty is “good with-in itself”. Kant describes ethics as action as any sort…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, as long as the moral law does not depend on our desires, it consists of what is called ‘categorical imperatives’ in Kant’s philosophical works (Gakuran…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant is a firm believer of duty based ethics, meaning that one’s morality is defined by ones motives. Thus, Kant believes that an action should be performed simply because it’s the right thing to do, and for no other reason. Also, Kant states that duty defines intrinsic value, meaning that a person’s motives for what they do should have ends within themselves, without consequences or desired satisfaction being built into their actions. Kant also states the one should act so that the maximum of your action can and should be made into universal law, expressing that the actions of your motives should apply to everyone in the same way. Thus, bringing us to the fact that action from duty has to be an categorical imperative, meaning that everyone should and would be able to act the same way, sharing equal positioning.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays