Difference Between Just And Unjust Law

Improved Essays
The political system is key to the creation of authoritative stability via government and politics. Laws are created in order to maintain a relatively peaceful, and productive society. Furthermore, they are also created to instill justice in society. Justice is defined as the lawfulness and fairness that affects everyone, however, there is a clear distinction between just and unjust laws. Regardless of this, people still possess different interpretations of what is just and unjust, thus not everyone can be satisfied with the laws. Nonetheless, creating just laws is the primary objective of the state, because this ensures that the rules of society are mandated ethically with regards to citizen rights. On the contrary, unjust laws wrongfully harms citizen rights and contradict the purpose of laws to benefit and protect citizens’. …show more content…
Similarly, this course of action would be no different than to be devoted to an unethical cause that mostly harms everyone. Each citizen has the right to take the fairness of the law into perspective, and determine whether they should petition, file a complaint, or relocate elsewhere. With this in mind, citizens’ ultimately decide whether or not they will be subject to just or unjust laws. In other words, this is a matter of choosing the right decision in consideration of one 's own interpretation of just and unjust laws. As a result, every citizen has an obligation to obey whatsoever they determine to be a just state, which carries out its intended purpose of uplifting

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Do you ever wonder where our laws came from or who came up with them? Well the king of Babylon Hammurabi created the first set of laws. Thanks to that ancient guy all nations have laws. Laws are important to society because without them i'm pretty sure our country's population wouldn't be as high as it is. So in order to have a modern society laws are important.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Confucianism Dbq

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This shows that the ruler must make wise choices when choosing officials as unqualified officials can cause chaos. Legalists believed in significant restraints on people, especially when electing officials in the hopes of creating order. Additionally, rulers were expected to be selfless as enforcing laws promotes equality and creates order within society.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Equality, freedom, rights, morality, principles, respect, love and trust are are just a few characteristics used to create a better and more just society. Despite the fact that these characteristics are very delicate when alone, but when mixed together, these ordinary, everyday occurring events of life come together to form a pure and all the more powerful “JUST SOCIETY.” "I've always dreamt of a society where each person should be able to fulfill himself to the extent of his capabilities as a human being, a society where inhibitions to equality would be eradicated. This means providing individual freedoms, and equality of opportunity, health, and education, and I conceive of politics as a series of decisions to create this society." - Pierre Elliot Trudeau Pierre Trudeau is known as one of the greatest political figures in Canadian history.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this next section Martin Luther King Jr. makes the argument that some laws meant to be broken; to do so he, defines just and unjust laws and also provides proper examples. King defines just law as “a man-made code that squares with the moral law;” it is a law that is equally upheld by both majority and minority groups (804). He goes on to define unjust laws as “any law that degrades human personality” (804). By accurately defining the difference between just and unjust laws, it sets up the tone for his argument on why it is acceptable to support some laws and disobey others. He wishes to convey the idea that just because a law is put in place by a government, that does not always deem them reasonable and without corruption.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Human societies have always required systems to maintain balance, order, and control. The foundation of human civilization spawned from a rapid growth in population during the neolithic era, compelling communities to form hierarchical systems, and early ideas of law. While, during the millennia that followed, ideological and technological progress compelled these systems to evolve and improve, history reveals a repetitive continuity connecting the past and present. The decisions, systems, and mistakes made in the past inevitably echo into the future, our occasional capacity to learn from these mistakes notwithstanding.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individuals have rights that are extracted from the law of god or moral laws. It is the duty of individuals in democratic society to follow the laws of the land, if they are just. It’s an overstatement to think the government doesn’t create unjust laws. When faced with an unjust law, a decision has to be made by possibly resorting to deceptive practices. There must be the courage to disobey any unjust law and discharge it as a moral…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Law originated from majority’s habit, and intended to raise fairness and justice to the world. Just like Roman Empire desired to reinforce its strength by using Law of the Twelve Tables. This ‘code’ from Ancient Rome mainly based on their behavior and their social value back then. However, as more and more people attracted to Rome, the main purpose of this law had been twisted. They began used this law to reinforce their autocracy and oppression toward slaves and women.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his foundational work The Types of Legitimate Domination (1922) Weber attempts to establish a theoretical framework to help understand the nature of political legitimacy and the means by which it is achieved. By observing human relationships and their interaction with both formal and informal institutional structures, he is able to provide a detailed sociological analysis highlighting fundamental differences between several strategies of domination (Weber 1978: 212). In doing so, he establishes three 'pure types ' of legitimate authority based on the type of legitimacy claimed therein; legal-rational authority; traditional authority, and charismatic authority. Each type, according to Weber, endows its ruler with a justifiable right to rule,…

    • 1100 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As society evolves and modernizes, so does the way that governments rule over their citizens. They begin to tailor their words and laws to make themselves appeal to the people, while true intentions stay hidden. These laws can scrape away at the very core of a civilization; taking them down from the inside. Especially in today’s age, where the lines between democracy and absolute power can be blurred by politicians who see themselves as above the law.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What happens when a government passes an unjust law? Must the people succumb to that law forever? No, there is a very practical, nonviolent way to overturn an unjust law: civil disobedience. Civil disobedience positively impacts a free society by overturning government injustice efficiently and effectively. Government injustice is seen throughout the world.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dworkin on Judicial Discretion in “Hard Cases” Lu Zhao Boyu (Bozy) | A0127866R In the standard courtroom, one could reasonably expect the judge to be the one responsible for the holding of a case. However, does and should the judge exercise his own discretion when deciding cases? Prominent legal theorist H. L. A. Hart claims that judges do exercise discretion, especially in “hard cases”, where there is no pre-existing or unambiguous rule. To this matter, Hart’s brilliant student Ronald Dworkin offers an alternative theory, which argues that judges do not have discretion and should follow principles instead of rules, even in “hard cases”.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As political philosopher Montesquieu puts it “the spirit of the law is justice. The letter must be broken at some points to achieve it.” Justice is defined in the dictionary as being consistent with what is morally right. Unfortunately, what is considered as legal is not always consistent with what is morally right. For sure, a huge amount of laws are made to ensure that people have their fundamental human rights, safety, equality and freedom.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Earth is currently facing detrimental environmental issues. These issues have been evident for decades; however, many people have continuously denied them to be problematic or even their existence entirely. While these critics have managed to get away with the rejection of these problems for many years, it is no longer deniable that the issue of environmental degradation is very real and in need of immediate action. Much of the population has come to understand this, and have executed a variety of modest attempts to increase environmental sustainability. However, these efforts have demonstrated to be of minimal effect in solving the large-scale issues directly causing the degradation.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    As a consequence, we have a duty to obey the law but it can be overridden when we have a more pressing moral obligation . Furthermore, to reinforce my point of view I will rely on what Finnis advocated concerning that matter. He was also conscious that saying an unjust law is not a law is a contradiction, when he talked about the peripheral sense of law. Indeed, he explained that law has two senses. On the one hand, law has a focal meaning, “it describes rules which secure the common good by co-ordinating the different goods of individuals” .…

    • 2196 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    W.H Auden’s modernist techniques combined with his unique style of writing makes his poetry difficult to read and interpret. However, his eccentric use of words calls for the reader’s imagination to create images that help grasp the central idea of the poem. Such can be seen in “Law like Love” starting with the ironic nature of the title. Law, as we know it is something which has clear cut definitions and rules which many do not favour. Love on the other hand, is not meant to have boundaries and to be regulated by rules or be dominated.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics