Difference Between John Stuart Mill Act Utilitarianism

Great Essays
We often wonder what other worlds are like or what they could be like. There are civilizations with different rules that govern their people, different ideals and expectations they rely on to keep the peace. The differences are what peaks the curiosity in us all to learn new things and to explore the unknown. In ethics there are various approaches to everyone’s actions, thought process, and views. To have one code of ethics that standardized the world is unheard of. So much is based on how and where we grew up, what we have been exposed to and how we feel about the actions being taken.

With so many moral approaches and views, we have to look deeper into the ones we know about and choose the right ones for us. They can’t all be bad and they
…show more content…
Utilitarianism is that we should conduct ourselves and act in promoting the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people, even if that means that we ourselves are not directly happy from the task. There are two ways of to endorse utilitarianism, one is to act utilitarian meaning that peoples actions are right and they promote happiness for the general public, whereas the wrong actions would promote negative feelings for the general public. The second way is to rule Utilitarianism, meaning an action is right as long as it adheres to the rule that leads to the greater good. While Kant and Mill both have similar stances on how we should behave and how to create the happiness of the greater good no matter the outcome for your own personal pleasures, they also have differences. Such as they both have a twostep process for greater happiness, they both propose a base morality however Kant appeals to the reason of legislating a law for a reason, while mill appeals to what the people desire as an …show more content…
Mill and Mr. Kant, I understand their utilitarianism ideals, and doing your duty to make the greater good happy even if that means that you yourself will not be happy, and making sure that you are able to answer all questions that allow you to use yourself and others as a means to create a maxim. However I think we as humanity need to be able to nurture and respect each other. Find out what others needs are and help them achieve their goals, reach our own person goals for the betterment and the happiness of ourselves. By making myself happy I know I will in turn be able to make my daughter happy, and my husband happy. I will then pass on that same happiness that I have from earning my own goals and completing something important to me, to my clients and my friends. I think we should always do what is right for the greater good however not losing ourselves in the shuffle. You will never be able to make everyone happy however if you can make yourself an those around you happy then you have accomplished more than you set out to do by just achieving your own personal

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Both Kant and Mill created systems of philosophy that can guide the actions of an individual. Although neither system is perfect and they differ greatly, both have redeeming characteristics that attract believers. It can be seen that Mill’s utilitarianism attempts to remedy the problems brought up through practicing Kantian ethics. Although his propositions have strong merits, they can still be disputed by a Kantian. The example of lying can help one see the differences and problems with both systems.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When he [Kant] begins to deduce from this precept [i.e. CI] any of the actual duties of morality, he fails, almost grotesquely, to show that there would be any contradiction, any logical (not to say physical) impossibility, in the adoption by all rational beings of the most outrageously immoral rules of conduct. All he shows is that the consequences of their universal adoption would be such as no one would choose to incur. Here Mill considers of consequences in moral action, as we will see, Mill’s consequentialism rather than Utilitarianism is the direct charge made to Kant, these two notions are not same, the utiitlirms principle is seek happiness and avoid pain, precisely moral action would be conducted on maximizing happiness and minimizing…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believes the best action is the one that brings happiness to the most people. Kant believes that to perform an action it needs to be morally right and not just the most beneficial to the majority of people. Mill’s theory of utilitarianism is one that is strongly based upon the idea that the correct action is one that we deem to bring the most happiness to people. When talking about actions, Mill states, “It can only be determined…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism as defined by Mill is not clear and cogent. I disagree with his argument because I think it is too broad and too exaggerated. I do not believe that if something creates mass amounts of happiness that it should be done. It is not genuine ethics because it lacks metaphysics. There are many gaps in the principle that are not valid to his argument.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The interesting aspect of morality is how universally unbiased it is supposed to be, but yet, is still met with a debate towards what is morally correct and morally wrong. While morality is supposed to be objective, there is a subjectivity to whom those morals apply to and to whom they benefit or harm. In Chelsea Schein and Kurt Gray’s "The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm,” they discussed the evolution of morality and how difficult it is to establish a clear answer on what morality is. Schein and Gray wrote, “[one] definition of moral judgment is ‘evaluations (good vs. bad) of the actions or character of a person that are made with respect to a set of virtues held to be obligatory by a culture or subculture’ (Haidt, 2001, p. 817)” (Schein and Gray 35).…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Mill “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (John Stuart Mill). In its simplest form utilitarianism can be defined as actions morally permissible if and only if they produce at least as much net happiness as any other available action. Its core idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects. When making a decision for one’s self he/she must consider what will bring themselves the most happiness. When making a decision that will affects other…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill Vs. Kant Essay

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This would further suggest that when following Mill’s theory of Utilitarianism, right or wrong is more so accidental and depends on the world instead of depending on an individual's awareness of the situation. If the student were to follow Kant’s advice, then they must follow along with their duties as a student while also performing through a maxim which they could will to be universalized. In this case the student must study for…

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill tells us in his Autobiography that the “little work with the name” Utilitarianism arose from unpublished material, the greater part of which he completed in the final years of his marriage to Harriet Taylor, that is, before 1858. For its publication he brought old manuscripts into form and added some new material. The work first appeared in 1861 as a series of three articles for Fraser’s Magazine, a journal that, though directed at an educated audience, was by no means a philosophical organ. Mill planned from the beginning a separate book publication, which came to light in 1863.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    text Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals and Mill’s Utilitarianism we see both differences and similarities in Mill’s enlarged sense of justice and Kant’s kingdom of ends. To begin with, Kant’s approach to determining what is moral and what is not and some background on his philosophy is…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In efforts to find summum bonum or the ultimate good, philosophers during the 20th century began to investigate ethical issues, and tried to create their own versions of an ideal moral code. During this time, John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer base their ethical beliefs in the philosophy of utilitarianism. Both Mill’s essay Utilitarianism and Singer’s work Famine, Affluence and Morality explore the pursuit of happiness and its relation to moral philosophy. The doctrine of utilitarianism emphasizes the consequences of one’s actions as they add to the sum total of happiness.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Philosophers Mill and Kant provide divergent views on morals and ethics. Mill 's philosophy of Utilitarianism and Kant 's philosophy of Categorical impartial are two examples. Kant’s philosophy is a theory that People should do the right thing, even if that produces more harm than doing the wrong thing. Mills philosophy is a theory that the action that makes the most overall happiness is what is morally…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The recent events below have led to a series of protests over the past year but recently in the media the public has been advocating for the rights of African Americans in America based off of the neglect of the justice system for these young black men. These situations were all against young black males that had absolutely no reason to be murdered as a means to a solution. As these three situations only stand as representations of the many black male to be victimized by the police system in America it also shows us that although we have made strides in race relations and equality we still have a very long and tiring journey to go to be fully accepted by our fellow counterpart. Laquan McDonald was shot 16 times by a Chicago…

    • 1055 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is a normative moral approach to ethics that tries to maximise the pleasure and minimises the amount of pain in given a situation. John Stuart Mill analysis the principle of Utility, Utility meaning ‘happiness’. Mill often thought it was important that in any given situation that happiness is supposed to continue to be uplifted (Mill, 1864 p.9). Mill examines, that happiness is the ultimate end in which every human lives their life to, and so anything has to be a means for that end to happen (Mill, 1864 p.52). In linguistic terms, it can be described as a “’theory of usefulness’”…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics