Interactionist Labeling Theory

Improved Essays
What is the problem with interactionist and labeling theories? Interactionist and labeling theory is how crime and the behavior of crime are defined as well as how people who commit criminal acts are looked at in society (Bohm & Vogel, 2011). The problem with these theories is that not all people who commit crimes are bad people. Being labeled a criminal or less than desirable person because of a lapse of judgement or even a thought out plan that resulted in a criminal act does not define a person, depending on the crime. The criminal justice program does not differentiate between a person who is a one-time offender and a career criminal often times. As a result, society who looks at the arrest apps on their mobile device sees a person arrested …show more content…
If a person’s construes that he or she is looked at as a bad person or a criminal, then they are more apt to believe it as well (Bohm & Vogel, 2011).

Describe the four different types of feminist thought. The earliest of the different types of feminist thoughts was non-radical liberal feminism (Bohm & Vogel, 2011). Liberal feminists operate within society and attempt to knock down the social indifferences between men and women when it comes to equal opportunity and rights in all career fields as well as freedom to make any choice they desire. When it comes to crime, liberal feminists believe in gender socialization as the main malefactor (Bohm & Vogel, 2011). Radical feminism believes that patriarchy holds women back and allows men to prosper. Radical feminism is a philosophy “emphasizing the patriarchal roots of inequality between men and women, or, more specifically, social
…show more content…
Most developmental theorists believe that criminal behavior, particularly serious criminal behavior begins in childhood when children learn to bully, lie, and cheat (Bohm & Vogel, 2011). The second stage that developmental theorists look at is the continuity of a person’s life and if it is stable or not, which more than likely leads to criminal behavior if a person’s behavior pattern is unbalanced. A person who lives an unbalanced life with a less than desirable behavior pattern is often referred to as “career criminals” because they often live a life of crime (Bohm & Vogel, 2011). The third stage that developmental theorists focus on is a turning point in a person’s life where he or she decides to become a law abiding citizen. Peer pressure, social bonds, and the risk verses the reward play a huge role in why a person chooses to head in a different path when it comes to criminal activity. An example of this would be a person getting out of a gang in their late teens and early twenties because they see the path that they are heading is more than likely going to end with them dead or incarcerated. The final stage of offending that developmental theorist’s focus on when it comes to criminal development is desistance or “the process through which an offender stops offending” (Bohm & Vogel, 2011, p. 150). When I think of

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The concept of ‘turning points’ has been widely studied in the literature of desistance of crime. Turning points refer to particular events or experiences that happened at an earlier point of time, that cause a change or redirection in the long-term trajectory of an individual (Sampson & Laub, 1993; 2005; Teruya & Hser, 2010). Laub & Sampson (2003, p.39) notes that the ‘amount of time spent on the new trajectory’ is key in differentiating ‘turning points’ from temporary deviations in behavior. Turning points have become valuable indicators in understanding desistance from the life course perspective – which theorizes that criminality and desistance of individuals stem from different causal factors at varying stages of their lives (Sampson & Laub, 2005, p.13). Employment, marriage and parenthood are three turning points that have been discussed heavily in the literature.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our society today have become masters at labeling a person, whether or not it is respectable or ruthless. The labeling theory is a concept used to help explain why someone’s behavior is acceptable in one group but termed deviant in other groups. In theory, criminal behavior is deemed as such only if the perception of the person is recognized to be so. Theorists of labeling communicate that not everyone who commits a crime is labeled as a criminal (Trueman, 2015). Primary and secondary deviance are terms used to distinguish a normal act of deviant behavior as opposed to one that is not accepted so easily.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Self-report data plays an important role in revealing some of the dark figures of offending while allowing law enforcement officials to construct a database of offender typologies. Unlike official data collected from crime or arrest reports, self-report surveys extract information directly from the source (the offenders), therefore, revealing details which are typically not solicited during an investigation or an arrest. Moreover, self-reporting has its advantages such as simplicity, cost effectiveness, less sophisticated methodology, and can gather social, situational and behavioral factors, revealing methodologies and patterns of criminal behaviors. In contrast, self-report data also has weaknesses; the measures of crime and its correlates…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The essential contribution of symbolic interaction analysis is labeling theory. Labeling theory is the notion that deviance and conformity results not so much from what people do as opposed to how others react to those actions. This theory “stresses the relativity of deviance”, meaning that one behavior can be interpreted in many ways. It helps explain the way that our society understands deviance. Labeling deviance is when someone judges you for your actions and makes something out of it.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To begin, this discussion is based off the research paper written by Craig Bennell that studies the importance and utility of offender profiling. Some researchers have argued that profiles are often so ambiguous that they can fit a large number of suspects. This decreases its usefulness as a prioritization tool. It is also possible that investigators may also creatively reinterpret the statements the statements of offender profiles in order to make them fit a number of different suspects. The current study proposed that, like the participants in the early Barnum studies, individuals may reinterpret an offender profile to fit various, distinct suspects.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Theory One Social learning theory explains that humans are born with a “blank slate” and delinquency and crime is learned. This theory says that criminal behavior is learned by observing other individuals’…

    • 2208 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Question: why do criminals commit another offense after being punished? Criminal offense is a huge problem in all societies across the globe. Basic psychology suggests that human beings can be influenced by a reward-punishment system to condition their behaviour. Human nature is not so predictable, however.…

    • 61 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Modern Social Learning Theory suggest that “people learn the techniques and attitudes of crime from close and intimate relationships with criminal peers; crime is a learned behavior (Siegel, 2013).” There are four different ways that social learning can be used to explain criminal behavior. First is through differential association, which means that the amount of time that is spent with a person, the frequency that is spent with this person, the priority of this person in one’s life, and the intensity that a person has on one’s life leads to another picking up on their antisocial and criminal behaviors. Second is neutralization theory, which is where one learns to drift in and out of legal and illegal activity, but the must first be able to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dexter Crime Theory

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Throughout history there have been numerous explanations that try to determine why individuals or groups engage in criminal activity. Criminology is used to understand the causes of criminal behavior on both the social and the individual levels. There are many theories within criminology that are used by criminologists to explain what causes individuals and groups to commit crimes, as well as how to prevent them from doing so. One of main focuses of criminology is to understand the social influences that shape criminal behavior. Many popular images of crime portray explanations behind the motivations of criminal behavior.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Edwin H. Sutherland’s theory of Differential Association, nine components are below (Edwin Sutherland's Differential Association Theory Explained 2017): 1. All criminal behavior is considered to be a learned behavior. I agree with this theory, I don’t think that criminals are born with the knowledge of how to justify or commit a crime. 2. Criminal behaviors are learned through the interactions that one person has with others through variable communication processes.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The social learning theory states “Criminal behavior is learned through human interaction” (Siegel, 2010, p.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Walsh & Hemmens, 2014). This quote describes the ways in which people can experience the same situation, such as the “teen arrest” quote stated previously, but the consequences (reward or punishment) will have a different impact on the person. The impact of the consequences (reward or punishment) will mold the individual into performing “conforming” or “deviant” behaviors. The theories are similar in the ways they attempt to explain deviant and/or criminal behaviors in a way that contradicts psychology or biology as the only explanations of criminal behaviors. Sutherland’s ability to eliminate psychology from his theory of Differential Association created a way of explaining and theorizing criminal behaviors as a more understandable concept.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The degree of influence one receives from messages favoring deviant behavior varies by intensity, priority, frequency, and duration proposing that through interaction with others, individuals learn the values, attitudes, techniques, and motives for criminal behavior” (enotes 2015). This theory focuses on how individuals learn to become criminals, but it does not concern itself with why they become criminals. The theory predicts that “an individual will choose the criminal path when the balance of definitions for law-breaking exceeds those for law-abiding. This will be reinforced if social association provides active people in the person 's life. The earlier in life an individual comes under the influence high status people within a group, the more likely the individual is to follow in their footsteps.…

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Labeling theorists and deterrence theorists both have a particular view with their theories when it comes to criminal punishment. To understand those views it is essential to first understand both the labeling and the deterrence theory. Labeling theory looks into labels that are placed on individuals based off of certain characteristics or attributions that they posses. This can be seen as a form of control to weaken another by giving them a particular label. With this being stated labeling theory can be associated with social control as labeling another individual can be viewed as a social control.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The independent subculture of the lower-class consists of focal concerns, which are values that the lower class have which controls their lives. These focal concerns include smartness, toughness, trouble, excitement, autonomy, fate. In the lower-class community, excitement is typically valued because lower-class people lead dull lives, autonomy is typically valued because to let anyone have control over you is considered bad, trouble is typically valued because people in lower-class communities are judged based on how much trouble they can cause, toughness is valued because those who aren’t touch are considered weak, fate is typically valued because most members of the lower class believe that some other worldly being is in control of their…

    • 1094 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays