Difference Between Globalization And Colonialism

In the 19th century, some powerful European countries expanded their countries to new territories, known as "colonialism." Both colonialism and contemporary globalization can lead to inter-state relations. In this article, I will compare Colonialism and contemporary globalization.

Colonialism is defined as a policy or practice of "full or partial political control over another country, its occupation of settlers and its economic exploitation". Globalization means the integration of economy, finance, trade and communication on a global scale.
Globalization implies a broader perspective of opening up local and nationalist perspectives to an interconnected and interdependent world, freely moving capital, goods and services across national borders. However, it does not include the unrestricted flow of labor, which, as some economists have suggested, …show more content…
First of all, both the globalization and colonialism will make a damage on other weakness countries. But, the colonialism cause the damage directly, because the strong country will occupies the weakness country, destroy the original economic in order to develop their economic in the weakness country. Nevertheless the damage which caused by globalization is indirectly, because the trade happens between the strong country and strong country, the economic between these countries develop quickly, so the weakness country which doesn’t take much trade will be lag, this is also a kind of damage.
Secondly, the globalization mainly include the trade of goods, or something would increase the level of economic, but the colonialism contain many things, for example, the territory, the area to plant food or force the people in the weakness country become slave. The globalization means exchange and transaction, but the colonialism means plunder. Globalization can benefit two countries which do the trade, but the colonialism would benefit one of these two countries, and hurt the other