Difference Between Freedom And Determinism

Decent Essays
Freedom vs. Determinism

For this essay, I have chosen the philosophical problem of freedom vs. determinism.
According to determinism, everything that happens is determined by a prior cause. So, therefore determinism holds that every event is the necessary result of the chain of causes leading up to it. An implication of this kind of view is that from a given state of the universe, there can only be one possible future. Psychologlists who take the free will view suggest that determinism removes freedom and dignity, and devalues human behavior. By creating general laws of behavior, deterministic psychology underestimates the uniqueness of human beings and their freedom to choose their own destiny.
…show more content…
To exercise this kind of freedom means being ultimately responsible for one's choices. An example would be, if I was kidnapped and held against my will in a locked room, my practical freedom is limited, however I can still choose how to react to my situation. I could panic and try to break out or I could chose to accept my fate and just lay around in the room I was put into. Determinism is often contrasted with free will. It is the metaphysical notion of freedom, freedom of the will, that is threatened by determinism. The textbook lists three different options as how we can respond to this conflict.
Option A is to just accept determinism and reject the belief in free will. Option B is to show how determinism and the idea of free will are compatible. Option C is to endorse the idea that we have free will and reject determinism. I feel that our freedom may be limited at times. I mean you can go out and commit a horrible crime if you chose to, however you won't be free from punishment from the government. You can stab and kill someone if you chose to, but you don't have the choice to deny being arrested and jailed. In determinism, every event is caused
…show more content…
I don't believe so though. I believe freedom of will and even fate plays a part in that. As for a solution of the problem of determinism vs free will, I don't really have one. The problem of determinism vs free will has baffled many philosophers for many, many years. So, how can I a mother, wife and EMT possibly have a solution? It is obviously a profound problem because without free will, there cant be morality and no right from wrong. It would mean that all of our behaviors and all of our choices would have been pre-determined and this would mean that we have no choices and no creativity neither. The book states on page 14, "why keep worrying about how to reconcile the idea of freedom with determinism? Isn't the basic sense we all have-that we are free-at least as important and as credible as any philosophical theory?'' I would have to agree with this statement because maybe their simply isn't a way to solve this problem and maybe it really isn't even an actual problem at all. Its simply a philosophical one that doesn't have a solution that philosophers can all back. So, take expierences for what they are and learn and grow from them. Evolve from past expierences to grow as a person

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In the following, I will argue that people act upon their own free will and not through determinism, and disprove the third and fourth components of Strawson’s initial Basic Argument. Determinism is defined as the theory that everything that happens is determined to happen exactly as it does by what has happened before. Essentially, this means that every choice that a person makes they have not actually made- their choice was determined for them long ago and they are acting how they believe they chose to act. This is similar to the Christian belief of predestination, which is defined as the foreordaining of all that will happen in the future. The principal difference between determinism and predestination is that the concept of predestination…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Determinism is defined as all events occur according to the human due to external causes and in which the human has no control. Determinism is carefully evaluated due to the results of Cesare Lombroso’s assumption. It is not an accurate prediction that an offender will commit to a crime due to their external causations. Robert Agnew demonstrates in his studies that determinism isn’t a reliable theory due to the free will of the offender. He mentions other factors that can determine the offender to commit a crime by a psychological, biological, and social reason.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Determinism is a philosophical idea that attempts to place all events that occur as inevitable as they are predetermined by previous events and the laws of nature. However there are many who came to be known as indeterminists who reject the notion that free will is absent from the process that causes events to occur. Indeterminists believe that there are possible events that have different probabilities of occurring based on human beings free will. Then Chisholm’s view of the agent-casual theory presents humans as always going through a decision process when making an action that leads up to an event they work through their desires in first and second order volitions and then they act. These actions are free from previous events and cannot…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article “Evil and Omnipotence,” J.L. Mackie explores the various adequate and fallacious solutions to the “problem of evil,” a problem in which “God is omnipotent; God is wholly good; and yet evil exists” (p. 119). While Mackie discusses, analyzes, and criticizes many solutions, including “good cannot exist without evil” (p. 120) and “evil is necessary as a means to good” (p. 122), my paper will solely focus on Mackie’s response to the fallacious solution that “evil is due to human free will” (p. 123), which begins “first I must query” on p. 124. This paper will formally extract, justify, critically evaluate, and engage with Mackie’s argument that existence of evil due to free will is erroneous. Mackie describes the free will…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fate, Destiny, and You: Assessment Paper In class we watched the film The Adjustment Bureau and in this film there was many instances that challenged free will with determinism. It’s very hard to not think about fate and destiny. There are many ways to answer what exactly our destiny is.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conflicts Between Freedom and Determinism According to Ted Sider and Earl Conee, the apparent fact that conflicts with the existence of freedom of the will is that every event has a cause. This apparent fact is also known as determinism. To see why determinism conflicts with free will, the concept of cause and effect must be examined.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Psychologically speaking, as humans, we are wired to think that we have the freedom to act and do based upon our own self judgment. For simplistic reasons, let’s assume that this “freedom” is analogous to free will which is a philosophical idea in which to act freely is to have multiple open futures and possibilities, or to be able to choose between many different choices. Determinism is the belief that every event (including action, choices, and decisions) is the inevitable result of a causal chain of events. In other words, a choice with an action (A) is the inevitable result of an earlier action of an earlier choice. This principle presents a problem for the concept of free will.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Take a poker player. They associate winnings with probabilities, now if we were under the assumption of a determinist then these probabilities would be useless as regardless of if the probability was high or low the outcome would be set. This is fine until you understand that probabilities contradict a determinist view. This is because even if the next card that’s flopped is based on probability, the actual event is total random as it’s not a given that the highest probability will occur. Now, how does this equate to the idea that we have free will.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The debate of Free Will v Determinism is one that has gone on for centuries, and shall continue to go on for many to come. There are many who believe that their view is the end all, be all, correct view to hold. While not all of these thinkers are correct in their standings, Paul Holbach’s essay, “The Illusion of Free Will,” lays out a strong argument for universal determinism; man does not have any free will, and all of his actions are determined by the laws of nature. His argument is one that is accurate and strong, leaving little to criticize, despite what many believe to be proof that he is incorrect: the presence of choice and the absence of restraint. He takes these two beliefs and shows exactly why they do not denote free will, and all…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Sider, determinism is the belief that every event is caused by a previous event. For example, when a ball rolls on the ground, we assume that some force (perhaps a child) caused it to start rolling. Determinism claims that all events are like the rolling ball; that is, all events are caused by previous events. Free will is much more difficult to define.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Free will, is the ability to choose how a person reacts which affects the outcome of the situation and affects the pathway they take in their life. While determinism says that no matter what happens your pathway in life is already predetermined. This means that these two cannot coexist together, because free will says that you can control the fate of your life, and on the other hand, determinism says that your fate is already predetermined and you as a person do not have control over what happens. It would not be possible for these two to be hybrid together. They contradict each other in how life plays out and whether you have control of your decisions and actions; or if your life events and decisions are already predetermined for you by your environment and genetics.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We, human beings, in the universe, all feel as though we are making decisions and using our free will each day. We are not forced to do things, we will them to be done. The higher power of God derives in us free will. Determinism is ultimately…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Determinism says the doctrine that all events, including human action, are ultimately determined by causes external to the will. Some philosophers have taken determinism to imply that individual human beings have no free will and cannot be held morally responsible for their actions. Pereboom and Holbach are two of those philosophers. His first part of his argument is that we humans have no control over our birth or physiology.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If we create a scenario where you are being robbed at gunpoint, you have two options, you can give the robber your wallet and valuables or you can refuse and be killed. In this case you hand over everything and the robber runs off leaving you alive. Now a hard determinist would say that this proves determinism. The act of you handing over your wallet was caused by the robber threatening death, you did not have the power to not give them your wallet. By using our new definition of a free act we can show that in fact you chose freely but the circumstances before you handed over your wallet determined your action.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free Will and Determinism have been discussed by philosophers for many years. Free will is associated with moral responsibility, and alternative actions that “could have” been taken over the one chosen. Determinism is the opposite view, and is associated with universal causation, and a lack of free will. Determinists believe that a person’s actions are inevitable, they are dictated by a person’s experiences, they believe nurture, nature, and even a person’s genes determine their future actions. Because of this determinists believe people hold no moral responsibility for their actions.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays