Difference Between Federalists And Democratic-Republicans

Decent Essays
Some of the difference that the Federalists and Democratic-Republicans had were that really that similar. There leaders were two different people they didn’t have the same leaders. According to page 280 in the text, the Federalists leader was "Alexander Hamilton was secretary of the treasure." The Democratic- Republicans leader was Thomas Jefferson he was an secretary of state. One of the difference they had was that they were ruled differently one them was ruled by the people & the other by the wealthy class. The Federalist had a National Bank & the Democratic had a State Bank. Based on what I read, the Federalists owned a strong federal government a British and on the other had the Democratic owned a strong state governments. They both emphasis

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Obviously they disagreed on many topics, some key federalists were Benjamin Franklin and George Washington. Key anti…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Federalists would have countered the authors view by stating that the Act was for the betterment of the country. The Alien and Sedition acts helped protect the country from French nationalists by allowing the President to deport anyone that was dangerous. It also helped keep journalists from creating lies that would hurt the country by creating instability. The Whiskey Rebellion erupted the tensions between the two parties.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    (Because George Washington was favoring a Faction.) 4.What were the difference between the first to political parties ( Views of The National Bank, roles of ordinary citizens in government, etc) (Alexander Hamilton began the Federalist Party which supported a strong central government and a national bank.)…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By the time John Adam’s presidency came to an end in 1800, two political parties surfaced with contradicting interpretations of the United States Constitution. The Democratic-Republicans had a strict interpretation of the Constitution, while Federalists had a loose interpretation. However, there beliefs were not always completely enforced by either party. In the election of 1800, Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican came to office. Although Democratic-Republicans presented themselves as “the guardians of agrarian purity, liberty, and states rights,” the occasionally shifted their beliefs if they thought it would benefit the United States.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans told about how uncentralized the United States would be if they were under the federal during Adams's presidency. Republicans' agreed that they wanted to expand of the U.S. army and navy, undertake on individual rights in the Alien and Sedition Acts, and new taxes and decrease the spending money used to support many of the federal actions that were being done. The main thing the Federalists wanted was a strong federal authority to prevent the extras of popular majorities, while the Democratic-Republicans wanted to take away majority of the national authority so that the people could rule more through state governments and let it be brought to one as a whole…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is commonly claimed that the idea of Jeffersonian Republicanism was Anti-Federalist. The whole statement is completely accurate because Thomas Jefferson and James Madison alter their policies to coincide with the Federalists perspective. This is proven to be true as evident in the economic and government policies perspectives. The Jeffersonian Republicans placed their faith in the virtues of an agrarian democracy.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the period of Washington’s campaign the United States was fairly new and states for the most part governed themselves. States were governing themselves to exercise their new freedom from the centralized government that they all were use to with Great Britain. There were so many thoughts on how the new world should be constructed that this caused problems such as each state wanting their own to the laws of individual’s rights. The lack of a central set of laws l and the ability to control chaos when rebellions or other disturbances occurred was almost impossible. Individuals came together to try and uphold the new world that they had fought so hard to start, so this party moved forward with their vision for the United States.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite the lack of political segregation at the birth of the constitution, by conclusion of federalist John Adams’ presidency, two distinct parties emerged: the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. These political parties held opposing views on numerous topics including states’ rights, the power of the federal government, and most importantly, the interpretation of the Constitution. While both political parties signed to the laws written in the Constitution, the Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists. When the national government changed from the hold of the Federalists to the hold of the Jeffersonian Republicans during the Revolution…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dividing the parties almost completely in half were two groups with called the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists were more for a weak central government and more power to individual states, also their biggest argument was for a Bill of Rights. Now on the other hand the Federalists wanted a stronger central government and were against a Bill of Rights because they believed the government would give them rights. The Anti-Federalists main argument for a Bill of Rights was that there were certain rights that were guaranteed to people that the government should not infringe upon.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    During the early, immature years of our nation’s history, the interests of north and south, rich and poor, and industry and agriculture were dealt with as compromises, upsetting both sides until two deeply different visions for the country arose. Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton believed that our new country’s federal government should be more powerful. However, Hamilton 's views faced strong opposition by many, such as Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson and House Representative James Madison. He believed it more wise to provide more power to individual states. The two emerging parties deemed themselves with names that reflected their most treasured values.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am persuaded that the Federalist [Hamiltonian] political approach toward governing the young United States had stronger ideas versus the Republican [Jeffersonian] position, which lacked in forward thinking, suppressed free marketing and trade, sought to reduce the national army, and yet supported virtue of the common people. The American Revolution caused high war-debt issues, requiring immediate and effective attention, which in my opinion demanded a strong centralized government. Hamilton’s group, the Federalists, were made up of mostly educated bankers, merchants, and manufactures with some wealthy plantation owners interested in securing the future of the Union by force of “big government”. They believed that government control should be in the hands of the elite and wealthy, that there should be a National Bank, and the establishment of public credit, saying it was authorized by the constitution as “necessary and proper”. Hamilton wrote, “In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men the great difficulty lies in this:…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the Constitution was ratified, they Federalist’s remained largely in power until they were replaced by the National Republican Party. The Federalist’s believed that the Constitution should have a loose interpretation, and that the people should do whatever they could to support the government and build up federal power.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Democrat-Republicans had to adopt Federalist beliefs to "keep up with the times" defined in laws such as the Embargo Act, and the Louisiana Purchase. Vice versa, the Federalists had to adopt Republican stances to somewhat partially hold their power in the nation, holding conventions and authoring journals that eventually led to their…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They believed that power should not be trusted in the common man, the wealthy elite should support the government more so than the common man, and America need to become an economic powerhouse in order to succeed. The Democratic-Republicans believed the opposite. They believed in states rights, in opposition to the strong centralized government that Federalists wanted, Also, they represented the common man and trusted them with the nation 's decisions, more so than the elites. Their economic approach reflected the needs of small businesses owners, farmers and individuals rather than of wealthy merchants and large commercial businesses.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both these parties often have different views on how the country should be run and different outlooks on political issues. With these two parties there is still one that is rarely spoken of one of which is the Federalist. The Federalist are supporters of the United States government a U.S. political party founded in 1787 to advocate the establishment of a strong federal government and the adoption by the states of the Constitution. By the 1820’s most of the federal principles had been adopted by the Democratic Party and the Federalist Party was no…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays