Difference Between Federalist And Antifederalist

Improved Essays
Imagine fighting and winning a war for independence only to be told the new form of government proposed could be allowed to do the exact same thing you fought to get away from. This was the battle being waged between the Federalist and the Antifederalist about how to govern the newly independent country. The Federalist wanted to replace the Articles of Confederation with a Constitution and form a central government and the antifederalist wanted to keep the majority of government within the states locally.
The Antifederalist movement did not like the idea of a constitution. With the war for independence fresh on everyone’s minds the thought of having a government that was allowed to tax individuals, had 3 equal parts of government legislature,
…show more content…
The Bill of Rights wasn’t the only problem the antifederalist had with this new constitution. The Federalist were made up of mostly elitist bankers and business owners. This caused the antifederalist to think that the federalist would only look out for the rich and powerful leaving the rural areas and lower class unrepresented. The antifederalist wanted the government to be locally ran and the power be left in the states hands so that it would guarantee that taxation without representation would not occur (Berkin, 2015).
With most of the antifederalists coming from the lower class and rural farming areas the fear was that the elitist Federalist could not understand the day to day struggles or needs that the antifederalist faced in their lives and wouldn’t represent them in congress appropriately.
The 3 branches of government with a chief executive officer over the executive branch hit close to home for the antifederalist and many other Americans. They had already seen what one person in charge could do when the colonies were under British control and King George III was the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Anti Federalist were a group of people who feared that the central government would have entirely too much power. They didn't like the fact that there would be a person incharge of nations. They also feared that the congress would misfortune the…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It didn't make sense for the National Government to have more power leaving the states weak. They also believed that the power among the three branches was not equally divided. The Anti-Federalist were more for the people, more of which were farmers and small landowners. More and more the Anti-Federalist believed that the Federalist were more interested in a aristocratic society which would be at the expense of the commoners of the colonies. Now the way the Federalist won over the ratification of the Constitution was that James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton wrote The Federalist Papers which helped convinced some people to ratify the Constitution.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The anti-federalist thought that this new document would have all the same characteristics of Great Britain the country they had fought so hard to extract themselves from and others feared that this new government threatened their personal liberties. The Anti-Federalist demanded a document that protected states rights and individual rights and eventually the Federalist made The Bill Of Rights. I am standing here today signing the ratification of the constitution because of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists making this…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The anti-federalists feared that the central government would become too powerful and that if the government would commit an infraction on the states’ rights. The Federalists were in agreement with the constitution. The federalists were wealthy, well educated and were unified by the thought of higher power. The leaders of the Federalists included John Adams and Alexander Hamilton both yearned for an effective constitution. In contrast, the Anti-federalists were generally farmers and anybody that fell below the line of being wealthy.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Anti-Federalists are against it and want a stronger state government. They have many fears about Constitution especially since it didn 't have Bill of Rights when it was ratified. One of people against ratifying the Constitution is Patrick Henry who gave speech for it. Henry sees himself as a guardian over rights and liberty. He didn’t get to go to the convention where the Constitution was being made and he saw this as America being in great danger.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To this day, both sides, Anti-Federalist and Federalist, sound persuasive. The Anti-Federalists focused on the American want for local governments that respond directly to popular concerns. The Federalists argued that only a national government could really protect the people’s rights and turn the new nation into a great power. But more than just this are many other issues including that smaller states, who feel that they are operating just fine, will get the short end of the straw.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Federalist shard many of the same ideas of the Antifederalist such as individual rights (Oaks 223). The Anti-Federalists shared different view on how the government should be ran. Because of their experiences with the tyranny of Great Britain, they feared the establishment of a strong national government. The Anti-Federalists also did not accept the use of separation of powers and checks and balances, because they feared the branches of government would abuse the power and not serve the purpose of protecting the rights and freedoms of the individuals. It was evident in the way they thought things should be ran and why they thought they where right, being that they where from a old-line of republicans and did not favor a system…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    FEDERALIST/ANTI-FEDERALIST Political Viewpoint: ANTI-FEDERALIST 1. What fears does your side have about the future of the North American colonies? The Anti-Federalists feared that the Republican form of government formulated by the principles of the monarchy would be dominated by the features of aristocracy that allowed unwarranted stretch of power over the liberty, life and property of all its citizens. The federal government imposed secret deliberations and hasty plans for ratification which threatened the sovereignty and independence of all states.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It brought up leadership, economical and legislative issues. In conjunction with the issues it brought up, it also began to cause issues with citizens and political leaders. The Anti-Federalist party who wanted a weak central government, had strong opinions as to why they believed it was wrong for America. On the other-hand, Federalists believed a stronger central government was the best choice for the country. In the end, the Articles of Confederation were and replaced with the Constitution to satisfy both parties as much as they could.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Revolution Dbq

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Two groups that played a key role were Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalists believed in having a strong central government, whereas Anti-Federalists waned the majority of the power given to the people and were wary of the government having too much control. These groups are similar to Authoritarians and Libertarians of today’s society, respectively. In fact, these group’s differing beliefs sparked one of the disagreements surrounding the Constitution, “One of the many points of contention between Federalists and Anti-Federalists was the Constitution’s lack of a bill of rights that would place specific limits on government power. Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of the group’s disagreements, they came to write explanations for their position in essay. These essays came to be known as The Federalist Papers and The Anti-federalist Papers. The Federalist papers had a main reason to convey the interpretation to the new constitution. While the Anti-Federalist Papers was pleading those who still secured their rights to allow discussion over the same document. By reading them, we learn that the Anti-Federalist did not think the new Constitution accurately explained the rights of its…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The anti-federalists argued that the Constitution represented a step away from the democratic goals of the American Revolution and toward the monarchy and aristocracy. Thus, they felt it gave too much power to the federal government and took a lot of power away from state and local governments. In addition, they believed that the federal government would be too far removed to represent the average citizen. Moreover, they feared the nation was too big for the national government to respond to the concerns of people on a state and local basis. Last, they worried that the original text of the Constitution did not contain a bills of rights.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two of the major leaders of this group were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, who was overseas during this time. The Anti-Federalists thought that under the Articles people had the rights that they rightfully deserved. Under the Articles, the poor people benefitted greatly. During the process of trying to get the new Constitution ratified the Anti-Federalists felt that under this new government the rich had all of the power instead of the people (Doc 5). Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Anti-Federalists needed to keep our legislature as seems to be, which would imply that we would fundamentally be a government. Doing this would cause threatening vibe toward the administration. The Federalists had confidence in a solid focal government. They needed the Constitution confirmed promptly, simply the way it was. They needed a portion of the forces expelled from the states and given to the focal government.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the time, the government was run under the Articles of Confederation, supported mainly by Antifederalists. The Articles…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays