Tension Between Responsibility And Obligation

831 Words 4 Pages
All people have personal values and ethics, just as they have cultural values. Often times, those personal values and ethics may clash with those of their employer. As an example, as an individual, a person 's ethical guidelines might require honesty, integrity and respect. If that individual works for a company that does not necessarily operate under those same tenets, the employee may well face an ethical dilemma. An individual should look at his or her personal values, organizational values and ethical values come into play in the decision-making process. One of my personal values is that of trustworthiness. To honor that value, I tend to be very honest and forthright, to the point where I am apt to divulge information to a client that …show more content…
Give examples where you or other have experienced the tension between the two?
The difference between a responsibility and an obligation is, being responsible means you have a sense of moral or ethical duty to something or someone which may imply an obligation to do something. An obligation is simply a mandate to do something that does not connote any moral or ethical dimension. The two words can mean the same. For example, my family is my responsibility and obligation.
The first example where I have experienced the tension between responsibility and obligations, is between my daughter and my job. I had a mandatory conference at my job about a month ago. The conference was from 09:00am-04:00pm. My daughter get out of school at 03:20pm. On that day, I did not have anyone to pick my daughter from school at the appropriate time. As a parent, I was not going to leave my daughter at school for an extra thirty minutes. I had to leave my conference an hour early to pick up my daughter. Even though, I was penalized for leaving, but my responsibility was to my child.
The second example where I have experienced the tension between responsibility and
…show more content…
News about a government court requesting Apple to open the speculator’s iPhone has enlisted broadly with the general population: 75% say they have heard either a lot (39%) or somewhat (36%) about the circumstance (www.people-press.org).

The national overview by Pew Research Center, led Feb. 18-21 among 1,002 grown-ups, finds that practically indistinguishable shares of Republicans (56%) and Democrats (55%) say that Apple ought to open the San Bernardino suspect’s Phone to help the FBI 's continuous investigation(www.people-press.org). By differentiation, independents are isolated: 45% say Apple ought to open the iPhone, while about the same number of (42%) say they ought not open the telephone to guarantee the security of their other clients ' data (www.people-press.org).

Crosswise over age bunches, grown-ups ages 18-29 are partitioned over what Apple ought to do: 47% say the organization ought to open the iPhone, while about the same number of (43%) say it ought not open the telephone to guarantee the protection of its different clients (www.people-press.org). Among grown-ups age 30 and more seasoned, fairly more say Apple ought to open as opposed to not open the San Bernardino suspect’s iPhone. By a 54%-27% edge, those 65 and more established think Apple ought to open the telephone; 18% don 't offer a view

Related Documents