Political Equality Vs Economic Inequality

Superior Essays
Through many centuries, equality has been a key feature in the United States. The definition of equality holds many ambiguities. There are various forms of equality and inequality worth discussing. In the United States, with a free-market trade, economic inequality has often been favored by America citizens rather than political inequality. Progressively, the inequality engrained in society over the last three decades helps explain why Americans prefer economic rather than political inequality. There is a conflict between economic inequality and political equality to the extent that the wealthy population influences the American political system more than people with less money and fewer connections due to the poor’s lack of political efficacy, …show more content…
This poses many conflicts surrounding the makeup of a democratic society. The United States is made up of individualists who have recognized that the “American Dream” is a goal worth striving for. The “American Dream” is a bridge between capitalistic intentions and egalitarian politics. In the United States, “Children born to 90th-percentile earners are typically on track to make three times more than the children of 10th-percentile earners” (Pinsker 1). Though this can be the result of the “American Dream”, it is important to establish that drastic economical inequality will directly conflict with political equality. Economic inequality is beneficial to the extent at which people strive to achieve goals. However, when greedy business executives abuse their power and wealth, politics tend to be swayed with fiscal renumeration. People who live paycheck-to-paycheck and have a routinized labored job typically have low political influence because of time. They do not have high political efficacy because they believe they are not worthy to influence politics due to their lack of education and wealth. This then leads to a shortage of political understanding which surrounds them. Due to a lack of education and income, the poor predominantly interact and associate themselves with other poor people, while the rich associate themselves with other rich …show more content…
Those who hold a public office are often wealthy and have a vast amount of connections. The problem surrounding access is the inevitable inequalities engrained the United States society. There are many obstacles in society that dissuade certain people from voting such as the spread of information, education, participation, savviness, and most detrimental; time. In essence, those who are near the poverty line do not have the time to actively engage in United States politics. This inherently gives the rich and wealthy more power to engage in society due to the obsolete opinions of the poor, “the already powerful would meet some counter-force in the collective organization of the less privileged… But there has never been equality in political participation. There has never been anything approaching equality in political representation”(Phillips 56). Access is an term that helps the understanding of how an economic inequality essentially harms the existence of political equality. Alongside access, there is also recognition. Anne Phillips described recognition as the second element that plays a large role in the growing conflict between economic inequality and political equality. Social recognition plays a large part in American society. People judge themselves based on their social status, which can degrade or surge peoples’ confidence levels. Confidence levels play an important role in society for many reasons. Those

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rising Inequality Essay

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stiglitz writes that unbalance politics “driven by extremes of inequality leads to instability” (112). The increasing power of the wealthy leads to deregulated and inefficient markets. When polluters don’t pay the social cost of their environmental damage, and banks are properly punished, costs are not being allocated correctly and he market can’t function properly and operate at a sustainable equilibrium. Additionally, the elites succeeding in shaping an unjust legal system that fails to effectively discourage certain types of bad behavior. Extreme inequality creates a voter paradox in which people are only willing to vote if they feel that the political process is working in their favor.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But because they want to use the lower class nation they increase the cheap labor rate. Cheap labor is usually found in non-western countries. The exploitation of cheap labor has created a poor and dependent workforce where most people of color work. The profit accrues to the wealthy owners, who are mostly white, resulting in a racially divided world. (Andersen 208) Those rich countries can’t use their own population for their production because the labor is heavily expensive in their country and the economy will drop down.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Wealth gives the upper class political and social power that they use against the lower class. This creates a complex social dynamic, especially since developing countries are typically trying to recreate the social and political dynamics of first world countries to experience similar successes. This leaves the lower class with their own issues, mostly of a psychological nature. The lower classes in many third world countries are unable to participate in their own economies, and are therefore reduced to laborers with no political power, which is detrimental to a person’s psychological state. A presentation from the American Psychological Association outlines a study by Boyle et.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Flat Tax Hardships

    • 1025 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A very important reason a flat tax should not be implemented as the United States new way of taxation is because it penalizes the low-income segment of the population. Laurence Kotlikoft states that a flat tax would be “hitting the poor on every dollar they earn and exempting the rich on virtually all of their earnings.” This indicates that implementing a flat tax favors the rich, whereas it would be hurting the poor. While the rich are keeping more of their money, the middle class is penalized and would pay higher taxes than they would have originally needed. Middle-class and working-class people are what stimulate the economy. In addition to, in Holley Ulbrich’s article, Flat Tax Is Class Warfare, she states, “the attraction of simplicity hides a big change in the distribution of tax obligations among the poor, the middle class, and the rich.” Holley is ultimately stating people are more enticed by the simple nature of the flat tax that they tend to fail to notice the hardships on those the flat tax would undermine.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many politicians write laws that only make them wealthier, while putting the financial burden on the lower income individuals and families of the population. This must be changed, as the average person cannot be expected to slave their lives away for a paycheck so the wealthiest members…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the article, “Trends and Sources of Income Inequality in the United States”, the author Jongsung Kim expresses his concerns with inequality and happiness. He wrote, “… according to Alesina et al. (2004), individuals are less likely to identify themselves as happy when income inequality is high. Although they find that this tendency is weaker in the U.S.—because people believe that the U.S. is still an upward mobile society...” (Kim 2). This means that even though individuals do not see themselves as happy when there is clearly a large income gap among society, they still have hope that one day they too will be able to move…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction Income inequality is a major concern in wealthy countries and especially the United States, where the gap between the rich and the poor is continuously increasing and the social effects can be seen on a larger scale. It may be true that some level of inequality does not harm nations, as it can provide people with incentives to become better by improving their skills. However, this phenomenon is out of control and puts the country into a stagnating growth phase which generates instability and social disparity. Inequality can be measured in various ways, but the simplest one is to compare what people at the top 1% earn vs. what people in the typical middle class earn. The newest trends define the middle class as people who earn between…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Big Corporations undermine democracy by avoiding taxes because they can change the market to favor them. They have tons of money so they have power and influence over government, because with their money the government would not be able to function properly so the government has no choice but to pass policies in their favor. It’s been proven that the rich have more say in government while “average citizens” like you and I “have next to no influence.” (Covert) Big Corporations are costing us money by not paying the taxes they are supposed to pay. We could have lower tax brackets and not have lower taxes but because they don’t do their fair share of paying we have to pay higher taxes than we need to. This is insane because it’s costing the united states “around $100 billion per year”…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The wealthy businessmen argued that they had worked hard for their wealth and deserved to be rich, they refused to pay their fair share of taxes to help out the rest of the American people and the American economy. Rich businessmen did not like the establishment of a minimum wage because it took money from their great wealth, despite the fact that the establishment of a minimum wage helped to balance out the uneven distribution of wealth that the US economy was having. According to Sarah Carroll, “There was a major unequal distribution of income that led to the richest 1% of Americans owning approximately 40% of the country’s wealth”(3). The establishment of the minimum wage ensured that the wealth was trickling down instead of just accumulating all at the top with the upper class, which in turn helped the uneven distribution of…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So why are the events of the red scare are so imbedded in America 's history? It 's fair to say that it wasn 't just because America hated communism. The propaganda set during that time was so strong and well implemented that it still lives today. Immigrants struggle to make it in America, they have different political views, views that don 't necessarily benefit the already rich and powerful. So, what must the powerful citizens of America do to secure their overwhelming control of money and the government?…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays