Examples Of Dualism In Mental States

Improved Essays
Gamburd, Eitan
03393503

4. What does it mean to say that mental states are real?

Recall the last time you saw a movie at the theater. When the movie ended, were you sad? Angry? Joyful? Was the theater cold? Were the seats comfortable? Were you interested in the movie at all? Our conscious states or experiences such as thoughts, feelings, desires, and sensations can be attributed to mental states. To say mental states are real is to say that the brain and mind are two distinct substances by which the mind casually interacts with the body. Therefore, In order to believe in mental states, one needs to believe in a form of Dualism. The dualistic idea that mental states are real may be supported by the fact that no physical science is capable
…show more content…
More importantly, are mental states real? The major arguments for Dualism & mental states fall along the lines of religion, introspection, and irreducibility. Each of the major religions put emphasis on the meaning of life and the idea of an everlasting soul. Given that the disbelief of Dualism and Mental states are inconsistent with most major religions, many people find it difficult to discredit the idea. In terms of introspection, recall from earlier in the passage the last time you visited the movie theater. Could other people in the theater tell how you were feeling just by looking at you? It is evident that each individual can apprehend his or her own conscious thoughts and feelings. One cannot clearly understand how the thoughts are formed or what is happening in their brain to form those thoughts, however, the thoughts and feelings are as clear as can be. Moreover, the argument from irreducibility states that there is no possible physical explanation that could account for what is happening for certain mental occurrences. Rene Descartes argued that the human capacity for mathematical reasoning and language was beyond the scope of anything physical, thus could only be explained by the idea of a “supernatural” mind, by which mental states could casually interact with brain states. The idea that mental states are possible can only be attributed by the lack of scientific knowledge on the subject, thus, there is no argument that …show more content…
The simplest argument advocated mostly by materialists is known as Ockham’s Razor, by which if all else is equal, the simplest hypothesis should be accepted; in the words of William of Ockham, “Do not multiply entities beyond what is strictly necessary to explain the phenomena.” Where materialists believe that the only existing is substance is physical matter, Dualists believe in both matter and mind. Another objection to dualism is known as the relative explanatory impotence. It is clearly evident that the brain exists. Scientists know its exact composition, its microstructure, how neurons work, and how mental activity processes sensory information. Scientists have learned that the growth and development of the brains microstructure appear to be the foundation of various kinds of learning, which involve permanent chemical and physical changes to the brain. As neuroscientists have discovered key information about the brain, much of the brain’s behavioral properties, which were once thought to be “mental states,” could be explained scientifically. “Dualism” is just a name given to the information that is yet to be discovered which will explain certain mental

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To answer this question I will fist give an explanation of what functionalism is and its relation to dualism, materialism and mind-brain identity theory. From here I will outline the two key objections it faces namely the extra-cranial objection or china brain thought experiment and the qualia objection. I will state and explain why the qualia objection is the most serious of the two and why functionalism at present can not fully overcome it but in doing so I will address the replies functionalism gives as defence against this. Functionalism Functionalism is a form materialism, which in turn is the interpretation of processes of the mind as both mental states and brain states depending on how they present themselves, however there is only…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cartesian Dualism, or substance dualism, is the belief that the mind and body are separate and distinct. In 1949, Gilbert Ryle harshly critiqued the concept of dualism in his book, The Concept of Mind and, more specifically, in his essay ‘Descartes’ Myth’. The purpose of Ryle’s essay was to demonstrate that dualism (which Ryle believed at the time was widely accepted and dubbed it dogmatic) commits a fatal mistake, namely a Category-Mistake. The purpose of this essay is to show that Ryle’s argument against dualism in his essay is not fatal to dualism. II.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In philosophy, a theory that includes the viewing of the the mind and body as being separate kinds of substances or natures is known as mind- body dualism. This stance implies that the mind and body not only differ in meaning but refer to different kinds of entities. Thus, a person that proposes the concept of dualism would oppose any theory that identifies mind with the brain, conceived as a physical operant. Descartes reaches this conclusion by arguing that the nature of the mind is completely and utterly distinct from that of the body, and therefore it is possible for one to exist without the other. This argument gives rise to the famous problem of mind-body causal interaction that are still commonly debated today: how can the mind cause…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dualists Analysis

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Possible Replies of the Interactionists According to Dualists, human person: the human mind, and human organism: human body, are not one and the same thing. Human mind can not be reduced to simple physical activities, and one specific kind of the dualists, the interactionists believe that there’s a two-way causal connection between the human mind and the human organism: the human mind can affect human organism in a specific way, and vice versa. Adding to that, interactionists further illustrate that a mental action can cause a physical action, and other way around. In regard of this theory, the materialists have several refutations.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dualism Vs Physicalism

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The view of physicalism gives a stronger and more plausible answer to the mind-body problem. There are several reasons why this particular view gives a more sensible for answer to the problem at hand. These reasons include the rationale behind the reasoning of brain research, how the different aspects of reductive physicalism is able to address the non-physical aspects of the mind, as well as the less than sensible claims that the opposing view, dualism, presents in comparison. One of the main reasons why physicalism is able to prove itself to be the better answer to the mind-body problem is based off of research that society has learned about on the brain.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cartesian dualism violates these physical laws by proposing that non-physical minds causally interact with physical brains. The causal closure principle states that for any causally closed physical system, any physical event within the system has a fully sufficient cause. Thus, according to science, our brain is a closed physical system and any event within it has a fully sufficient physical cause. While Descartes disagrees with the brain being characterized as a closed system, science maintains its view because the empirical evidence supports the brain as a closed physical system. The tenets of dualism also conflict with the law of conservation of energy because while the law states that energy is neither created nor destroyed, dualism’s mind-body interaction would alter the quantity of energy.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mind-Brain Problem

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What is the Mind-Brain Problem? Is the mind a part of the brain or an independent entity? This question has been an issue of disagreement for scientists and philosophers for several decades. Three separate groups including dualism, materialism (monism), and functionalism, each offer a unique position to the mind-brain problem (Brysbaert & Rastle, 2009). Each group attempts to determine what constitutes the self and makes each person their own individual with feelings, beliefs, and private experiences.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The mind-body problem arises from our current inability to comprehensively describe the structures, encoding and operations of the mind at the level of the neurological hardware said to drive it. The apparent intuitive existence of propositional attitudes from our own introspection…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The mind-body problem is a debate that has raised questions throughout history and is still doing so today, philosophers argue as to whether the mind and body are one entity or two separate entities. The body is what we perceive to be our physical attributes, things like the head, legs, and so forth, the mind is one that controls our feelings, thoughts, and beliefs. For philosophers there are many ways to explain the mind and body problem but the two main ones include materialism and dualism. In this circumstance one has to come to a conclusion as to if they believe that the mind and body are separate entities, dualism, or they are one, materialism.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Smart Identity Theory

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages

    ID: 3031785238 1. In Smart’s paper Sensations and Brain Processes, he introduces the “identity theory” in which he states that mental states are physical states of the brain. This stems from physicalism, the idea that mind is the interior cause of behavior and mental states are biochemical processes in the brain.1 Smart would consider identity statements, such as “pain is the firing of C-fibers” as contingently true. Smart argues that the statement “pain is the firing of C-fibers” is contingently true because it is possible to conceive of worlds where pain is not caused by C-fibers firing; a contingently true statement is one where the statement is true in some worlds but not all. He goes on to say that when dealing with objects A and B, if…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physicalism Body

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Through the study of normal brain activity, there are indications that distinctive changes take place in our brains when tasked with certain activities such as speaking. There appears to be a concise association between events of the mind and changes in brain states (Lawhead, p. 82). The consistent correlation between mental and brain events, in addition to Ockham’s razor principle (“the idea that the simplest or most obvious explanation of several competing ones is the one that should be preferred until it is proven wrong”) makes physicalism a very favorable principle, indeed. This is because when physicalism is compared with dualism, its “properties and activities of the mind can be explained by the properties and activities of the body (the brain)” (Lawhead, p.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his paper, The Nature of Mental States, Hilary Putnam advocates for functionalism, the idea that the mind is defined by what it does, rather than what it is composed of. The mind serves a purpose similar to that of a machine, taking various inputs, performing a function, and producing certain outputs. He contests the arguments of the brain-state theory which claims that mental processes and brain processes are the same. I will claim that Putnam’s argument for functionalism is successful because he does not place limits on the inputs for functions, limit the function of the mind to only humans, and limit the number of functions that can be performed.…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The problem of other minds and the mind body problem. Dualism has traditionally struggled to account for how an immaterial substance can interact with a material one. Behaviorism on the other hand is a physicalist theory and implicit in it is the idea that the mind arises out of the material physical world. What dualism fails to account for, Behaviorism solves simply by ascribing to a view of the purely material. The other is the problem of other minds- the objection to Dualism based on the undesired conclusion that if all we can be sure of is our own bodies, we can never know for certain that others even really exist.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many things that differentiate man from animals: man can create laws and associations, man rationalize the danger in a situation, man reason the intentions of someone. None of these, or any others similar to them, would be possible without conceptual thought. By reducing the mind to the brain and its activities, the two materialistic theories (monism and moderate materialism) cannot include the intellect. No one has discovered an organ of conceptual thought. Moreover, if our cognitive function is reduced to merely a brain, then it seems impossible to account for any difference between a human’s brain and an animal’s…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It might be something that is hard to measure. However, I feel that in the future dualism will be further supported by research. Although, a small part of me feels unsure. There is a potential that all the complex function of the brain creates an illusion of a separate consciousness.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics