Critics and Truth
Often interpreted as a negative word, criticism and critics has a long journey over the past years. So, here is a question – what is criticism? A straightforward (or rather in layman terms) answer would be ‘finding faults’. However, finding faults on what parameters and what is so trendy and rebel about this?
Criticism has different stages
• On the very first stage, art is only judged on the basis of some pre-determined rules and parameters. It is been checked if they are being followed and if not then why? This stage may or may not involve critics own thought process.
• The second stage involves finding good and bad bullet points of the artwork. At this stage, true criticism lies where a critic gets the point of an artist, co-relate with it and expose it to the audience.
• Kind of discord lies at this stage where critic on the basis of his research, thoughts, and priorities, objectify any work by giving grades or stars. Critics own choice and taste also gets space here. …show more content…
It is indeed important for someone to analyze your work and give feedback because otherwise, you keep on doing same mistakes over and over without realizing loopholes. You will only notice when the artwork is being diminished. The organizations are so much into market research, reports and analysis nowadays and getting feedback on their work is the only reason. Same reason belongs to any artwork. Be it a movie, book launch, poetry, painting or any other kind of art, critics and criticism only upgrade the
Often interpreted as a negative word, criticism and critics has a long journey over the past years. So, here is a question – what is criticism? A straightforward (or rather in layman terms) answer would be ‘finding faults’. However, finding faults on what parameters and what is so trendy and rebel about this?
Criticism has different stages
• On the very first stage, art is only judged on the basis of some pre-determined rules and parameters. It is been checked if they are being followed and if not then why? This stage may or may not involve critics own thought process.
• The second stage involves finding good and bad bullet points of the artwork. At this stage, true criticism lies where a critic gets the point of an artist, co-relate with it and expose it to the audience.
• Kind of discord lies at this stage where critic on the basis of his research, thoughts, and priorities, objectify any work by giving grades or stars. Critics own choice and taste also gets space here. …show more content…
It is indeed important for someone to analyze your work and give feedback because otherwise, you keep on doing same mistakes over and over without realizing loopholes. You will only notice when the artwork is being diminished. The organizations are so much into market research, reports and analysis nowadays and getting feedback on their work is the only reason. Same reason belongs to any artwork. Be it a movie, book launch, poetry, painting or any other kind of art, critics and criticism only upgrade the