Neoliberalism Vs Individualism Analysis

Improved Essays
Nishita Aggarwal
PGDJ14106
Individualist anarchists and collectivist anarchists have more in common with one another than they have with neoliberalism. Discuss.
Anarchist ideology is defined by the central belief that political authority in all its forms, and especially in the form of the state, is both evil and unnecessary because order and social harmony can arise naturally and spontaneously, and do not have to be imposed ‘from above’ through government (Heywood, A. 2007 p 175).
During the nineteenth century, anarchism was a significant component of a broad but growing socialist movement. In the late nineteenth century, anarchists sought mass support amongst the landless peasants of Russia and southern Europe through anarcho-syndicalism amongst the industrial working classes. Syndicalism was a form of revolutionary trade unionism, popular in France, Italy and Spain, which made anarchism a genuine mass movement in the early twentieth century. However, the spread of authoritarianism and political repression gradually undermined anarchism in both Europe and Latin America. Anarchism has never succeeded in winning power, at least at the
…show more content…
Neoliberalism amounts to a form of market fundamentalism. The market is seen to be morally and practically superior to government and any form of political control. From the neoliberal perspective, the defects of government are many and various (Heywood, A. 2007 p 52). Free-market economist Friedrich Hayek argued that planning in any form is bound to be economically inefficient because state bureaucrats, however competent they might be, are confronted by a range and complexity of information that is simply beyond their capacity to handle. As human beings are rationally self-interested creatures, government officials will inevitably use their position to further their own ends rather than those of the general public (Heywood, A. 2007 p

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In addition, both political practices promote the idea of limited regulation, as it hinders individuals from obtaining monetary success. During the emergence of neoliberalism, influential liberals such as Friedrich Hayek and Ludwig von Mises took the ideas of classical liberalism as a way to further express neoliberalism. In Hayek's Road to Serfdom, he proclaimed that centralized planning, also referred to as government intervention, is coercive power that limited the individual of obtaining economic prosperity (42). Furthermore, he noted that a planned government would never produce as much economic output, freedom, and happiness as a free economic system (57). Although Hayek opposed the idea of government intervention, he ultimately discarded the classical liberal idea of free market or laissez faire economics, stating that “the liberal argument does not advocate leaving things just as they are” (Hayek 37).…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Myth of Individualism draws readers in with a captivating introduction through a controversial story about an individualist who kills to prove a point. This became a constant throughout the book, having examples used from topics that related to pop culture, politics and historical events to say the American values of individualism, mediocrity and self-sufficiency is overall fabricated. Therefore, American values are effected by the social structures on our lives which prove to be the thesis for Callero’s book. The book offers a weak first chapter with a strong fourth chapter that all fits into the message of Callero’s bestselling book. Callero’s book offered a first chapter that was the weakest out of the 214 paged body of work.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kevin Rudd Neo Liberalism

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this essay I will argue that Kevin Rudd is correct in criticising the neoliberal attitudes. To quote David McKnight “In effect, Kevin Rudd sees the financial crisis as the Berlin Wall of the free-market, marking the end of an era”. (McKinight, 2009) “The current crisis is the culmination of a 30-year domination of economic policy by a free-market ideology that has been variously called neo-liberalism, economic liberalism, economic fundamentalism, Thatcherism or the Washington consensus.” (Rudd, 2009) ‘A modified form of liberalism tending to favour free-market capitalism’ (Neo-liberalism, n.d.)…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Enron Neoliberalism

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the late 1970’s, when Carter was president, America was experiencing extreme stagflation where there was great inflation as well as zero rate of economic change, a stagnant economy. This resulted in the US, as well as Britain, turning to neoliberalism in hopes of changing the economy’s current condition (Harvey). While neoliberalism is interpreted by Harvey as, “a political project to re-establish the conditions for capital accumulation and to restore power to the economic elites”, which is exactly what neoliberalism does, advocates for neoliberalism were focusing on the idea of freedom to get many Americans to believe that this was the way to go. Not only this, but neoliberalism proposed the bettering of the population’s lives by “liberating individual entrepreneurial freedoms”, widely through a deregulated market and trade (Harvey). When Ronald Raegan became president, defeating Carter, he turned much more eagerly to neoliberalism than Carter had been (Harvey).…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Its policies emphasize privatization, deregulation, free trade and commodification. It promotes the economization and financialization of “non economic domains, activities and subjects” (Brown 31) such as college admissions and baby adoptions. Taking away from a greater social cause, neoliberalism encourages self-advancement and responsibility turning individuals and states into businesses. Wealth redistribution is exclusive to the powerful and wealthy which supports the large gap between rich and…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is social stability worth the price of giving up your individualism in exchange for a life filled with nothing, but joy? Is this not what everyone thrives for? In the book Brave New World the society that everyone is accustomed makes sure everyone is happy, has a role and title, and there is no crime nor religion. For a society to become a utopia in my opinion, must have these essentials: a society that everyone can be themselves without any worry, crime is a thing of the past, everyone contributes to society and are equal, and everyone lives a long and fulfilling life. Social stability comes with a price along with everything else, and I say that even though it has its advantages, people, along with myself are not ready to give up their rights and lose their individualism to achieve this so called utopia.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Neoliberalism is “a theory of political economic practices that proposes that human well-being can best be advanced by liberating individual entrepreneurial freedoms and skills within an institutional framework characterized by strong private property rights, free markets, and free trade” (453). Harvey believes neoliberalism is a form of social destruction. It has allowed the market to have the ability of controlling all human actions. Power and rights are then determined by capital and state control, which instantly gives some people more control over their rights. “Defenders of the regime of rights plausibly argue that it encourages ‘bourgeois virtues’, without which everyone in the world would be worse off” (454).…

    • 2077 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Ellerman's Analysis

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this article, David Ellerman starts by clarifying that by classical liberalism he is referring to libertarianism, then he states that his goal is to question whether classical liberalism rules out a consent based non-democratic government, in which people have consented to alienate the rights of self-government to some sovereign. Ellerman starts by explaining what the classical liberal view means when referring to voluntary non-democratic governments, such as ‘free cities’ or ‘start-up cities.’ These, at least in theory, are sovereign cities chartered to be governed by private corporations or a development agency of a foreign government. The aim is to let the market forces determine what the best system of laws are for economic development.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1914, Europe erupted into a conflict now referred to as World War I, which led to the deaths of over 38 million soldiers and civilians and becoming the ninth most deadliest conflict thus far in human history. With such death and destruction seen through this 4 year international conflict, a variety of international relation theories have arose trying to determine the causation of the war; of the theories that have arose, Neorealism and Neoliberalism seem the best at explaining the conflict. Of these two theories, I believe that Neorealism best explains the war aspirations of both the Allied and Central Powers. Beginning on the theory of Neoliberalism; it begins with a theory in which states are self interested players willing to cooperate…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every individualist also has one thing that a collectivist does not. That is ego. People think that an ego is bad and one should try to avoid having one, but Ayn Rand says otherwise. “And here, over the portals of my fort, I shall cut in the stone the word which is to be my beacon and my banner. The word which will not die, should we all perish in battle.…

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Goldman, 49). While this has become the stereotypical opinions of Anarchism,…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are numerous offshoots of anarchism that stretch from one end of the political spectrum to the other. The different sects and offshoots of anarchy, as I have found them, are as follows: Anarchism, anarcho-syndicalism, anarcho-capitalism, anarcho-communism, anarcha-feminism, eco-anarchism, mutualistic anarchism, individualism, Christian anarchy, literary anarchy, Collectivism, anarcho-primitivist, and surely the list can continue for pages and pages (Kinna, 2005). From this realization in an attempt to understand what anarchism as an ideology truly is, I was left…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Capitalism and Freedom Milton Friedman analyzes the relationship between the economy, society, and the individual. Friedman views economic freedom both as an ideal that is crucial in the effort needed in order to instill and uphold freedom of the political sense. His argument against government control of the economy centers on the understanding that if production is under the control of the government it is likely, if not certainly, impossible for any dissent, conflict, or discussion around the topic of economics to take place within a society. With this conversation being essentially nonexistent, the stagnation among society’s people which generally leads to loss of political freedom is inevitable. He points out that, even if it is the…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To effectively interpret theorist conceptualizations of power we must first understand power as a social construction. This is an important concept to acknowledge when attempting to understand the role of power in both Marxism and Anarchism. We must acknowledge each theories different idea of power distributions between individuals and authorities. Despite Marxist and Anarchist similarities they differ in ideas of the role of ‘the state’ and they conceptualize the use of power structures differently, one through direct action and the other through expecting capitalism’s own self-destruction. Williams and Shantz and Karl Marx offer different ways to understand power; both works raise questions regarding how we can dismantle, redistribute, or…

    • 1772 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay will outline key differences in economic policy between Keynesian and Neoliberal theory, examined by their effect on social policies in Australia. The scope of the essay is comparison between Keynesian Australia, particularly in years following the Great Depression, and Neoliberal Australia post 1975. In the years after the Second World War, successive governments adopted the Keynesian theory that the economy will not natural stabilise but requires government intervention to maintain sufficient prosperity. Similarly, government social policy considered unemployment and individual welfare as the responsibility of the government. In contrast, Neoliberal governments took the approach that the economy will naturally maintain its peak over time, adopting social policies which prioritised privatisation and individual responsibility in the form of ‘mutual obligation’.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays