Adoptive vs. Biological Rights “Adoption is a transformational process bringing parenthood to those who long for but cannot bear children and giving stranded children home, family, and their place in the world”(Van Der Pas). The most important aspect in the adoption process are the children involved. Therefore finding the right home for them is a long difficult process. A person making a decision to adopt, is engaging in a life long decision. It is a contract between multiple parties. It’s ultimately a commitment between adoptive parents, the child, and society. As a consequence adoptive parents are able to provide a good life for their child, a stable home, health, education, love, and psychological
…show more content…
Sometimes people forget the fact that adoption gives many children a home, and an opportunity of being part of a family. If it were not for adoption, thousands of children would be raised in foster homes. Its common knowledge that children who are raised in that type of environment tend to have less success in educational endeavors, higher rates of criminality, and are vulnerable to homelessness. I believe society should be grateful for those who bring children who need a stable life home. Otherwise, these children could become a burden on …show more content…
Anti-adoption forces continue to insist that adoptees are necessarily damage by separation from their genetic parents, and advocate more actively than before for eliminating adoption as we know it, transforming it into a form of legal guardianship so that birth parents can retain rights over their progeny. Many states are now experimenting with “enforceable openness” in adoptive arrangements, giving birth parents in some cases the kind of visitation rights that non-custodial divorced patents have, and threatening fundamental change in the nature of the adoptive family. (Bartholet)
I strongly believe that keeping the people who abandoned their children around is a poor choice. The fact is they’ll be in touch with the people who once rejected them, abused them, or were not able to provide for them a secure, and stable
Sometimes people forget the fact that adoption gives many children a home, and an opportunity of being part of a family. If it were not for adoption, thousands of children would be raised in foster homes. Its common knowledge that children who are raised in that type of environment tend to have less success in educational endeavors, higher rates of criminality, and are vulnerable to homelessness. I believe society should be grateful for those who bring children who need a stable life home. Otherwise, these children could become a burden on …show more content…
Anti-adoption forces continue to insist that adoptees are necessarily damage by separation from their genetic parents, and advocate more actively than before for eliminating adoption as we know it, transforming it into a form of legal guardianship so that birth parents can retain rights over their progeny. Many states are now experimenting with “enforceable openness” in adoptive arrangements, giving birth parents in some cases the kind of visitation rights that non-custodial divorced patents have, and threatening fundamental change in the nature of the adoptive family. (Bartholet)
I strongly believe that keeping the people who abandoned their children around is a poor choice. The fact is they’ll be in touch with the people who once rejected them, abused them, or were not able to provide for them a secure, and stable