Socratic Dialogue: Definition Of Andreia

Improved Essays
Laches is a 'definition' Dialogue, which aims to give definition of andreia (courage). Socrates and other characters scrutinize a number of possible definitions of courage as part of pursuit to discover that excellence is an introduction to an enquiry into how it might be taught and who will be qualified to teach it. The latter stages are never reached as it is characteristic of Socratic dialogues that the definitions all fail and discussion ends in confusion. At the start of the dialogue there is an extensive 'introduction', one which has a purpose to explore a problem stated by Lysimachus which prompts and underlies the dialectical search. Socrates demands the conceptual refocusing of this problem by changing the course of dialogue’s flow; which gives way to dialectic. …show more content…
The introduction (i.e. the material which precedes the elenchos) extends, in Laches, to almost one half of the Dialogue which has a number of ramifications for the dramatic structure: there has been a lot taken into account for the development of the 'problem'-the need to find a suitable education for the potentially idle youths, the Socrates' concern of the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Throughout her encounter the reader is presented with two main themes; the tragedy of Socrates, and the meaning of knowledge and morality. In addition to these themes the reader is better…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meno’s paradox also popularly known as the ‘debater’s argument’ is one of the widely read dialogs by philosophers. The paradox is a Socratic dialogue authored by Plato. The paradox attempts to find out the actual definition of virtue. The main speakers or characters in this dialogue are Meno, and Socrates and the paradox arise as they try to discuss human virtues. In this dialogue, Meno puts forward numerous hypothetical definitions of human virtues, that is, arete.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates is known for his ability to question others about their definitions of a specific virtue. Throughout his questioning, Socrates takes the definitions given to him and uses logic to show that the definitions do not hold. In one of these instances Meno is questioned by Socrates and fails to produce a satisfactory definition for virtue. When Socrates defeats Meno’s definition, Meno questions Socrates motive. Socrates claims to be simply inquiring the definition of virtue.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates was a Greek philosopher and the main source of Western thought. Little is known of his life except what was recorded by his students, including Plato. In Book I of Plato’s “The Republic”, Socrates and Glaucon were ‘asked’ to join Polemarchus along with Adeimantus and others at Polemarchus’ house (sp. 327-328c). Even though he was coerced into this discussion, Socrates shared his knowledge with the assembly.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The following essay will discuss Socrates reasons for refusing Crito’s offer of help in Crito, as well as whether or not these refusals are justified. We will discuss each of Socrates reasons for refusing in turn, criticising each as we move through the dialogue. Crito raises the problem of the extent to which a moral person is obligated to their City State (referred to as Athens and the State throughout), as well as the individual's dedication to the central principle of the dialogue; never doing any wrong. We will focus on the idea that by being wronged by the State, Socrates’ obligation is dissolved but his reasons remain justified due to his dedication to the avoidance of wrongdoing and Plato's need to have Socrates be a consistent character and this being the sole justification for his refusal. Socrates gives four reasons as to why he refuses Crito’s offer of escape.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s dialogue Apology, Socrates stands trail to defend himself from the accusations of “corrupting the youth” and disregarding the Gods of the state. In his speech he tells the jury that an oracle at Delphi told Chaerephon a friend of Socrates that Socrates is a man of wisdom and no man is wiser than he is. To prove this cannot be true Socrates conducts cross examinations to find someone who is wiser than he is. Through these examinations Socrates mission and main points are to help people by exposing their ignorance to find wisdom, to find virtue, to find truth and to improve the soul.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue In Plato's Crito

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Just or unjust, good or bad, virtuous or vicious- Pablo López Yagüe The writings of Plato, Sandel, and Straus bridge centuries but all highlight the importance of political theory as the basis in providing a discourse for the reflection of life. Plato’s Crito focuses on reason by adapting the moral point of view on the affairs of justice and virtue, through the analysis of the human natural and the social contract. Sandel’s Doing the Right Thing deliberation on problems helps assess the difficulty of morality over individuals, society and the law in determining what is just and virtuous. However, Straus’ What is Political Philosophy considers the Socratic political philosophy thesis in an effort to restore rationalism, by criticizing positivism…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Set during the socratic age of philosophy, The Apology by Plato chronicles the trial of Socrates on the charges of corruption of youth and not believing in the Gods. Plato, a young follower and apprentice of Socrates, documents the trial in its’ entirety from beginning to the unfortunate end in which Socrates is sentenced to death. The Apology is the trial of Socrates on a very basic and literal level but upon further inspection, one comes to realize that not only the philosopher is on trial but philosophy itself. Throughout the piece, Socrates attempts to convince the jury of philosophy’s worth and also criticize the condition of man. Furthermore, the recounting of the trial is also a protest of the hypocrisy within the Greek society that…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Curiosity killed the cat is a common cliché alluding to a negative connotation for questioning. However, everyone dies so is questioning really an awful thing? To the Athenians against Socrates, yes, but Socrates opinion is the exact opposite. Things must be questioned , but the intention for questioning is equally as important. This is where people may have been confused with Socrates which lead to his indictment.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the use of intense, connotative diction, Plato gives a further understanding into the setting and environment of the…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Something very similar happens in the Charmides, where Socrates is introduced to a young man who is said to be an exceptional model of temperance. Socrates questions Charmides about the virtue he supposedly possesses, but discovers that Charmides is unable to explain exactly what temperance is. Beginning at 158e Socrates asserts to Charmides that if he were truly temperate then he should be able to tell others what temperance is. Charmides agrees and at 159b he actually gives a potential definition of temperance—which is doing things “orderly and quietly”; this is significant because it is so unlike the interlocutors in previous dialogues who always gave an example to start with and had to be prodded by Socrates to give a definition. Socrates…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Furies Fury In this paper, I will discuss Aeschylus’ The Eumenides. Close reading reveals that while the Furies are angry over Orestes’ actions, their true passion lies more in his punishment than any other part of their speech. This thesis will be demonstrated through the analysis of passages through the lens of the following principles of close reading: temporal order, pronouns, and repetition. On page 243, lines two hundred fifty five to two hundred seventy one, the Furies are talking about Orestes’s actions, how they feel about Orestes killing Clytemnestra, and the punishment they expect to be put on Orestes for his injustice.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s Gorgias, Socrates and Callicles engage in a debate about what it means to be happy and to live a flourishing life. According to Callicles, a person is happy and flourishing when he or she is living as ambitiously as he or she possibly can. Living the good life includes chasing one satisfaction after another and having a constant influx of pleasure. In contrast, Socrates emphasizes on the idea of eudaimonia, according to which a happy and flourishing person is one that lives an orderly life, in which the person maintains discipline and control over oneself.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For my final paper, I will be answering the questions posed by Socrates’ critique of poetry and most interestingly, Socrates’ statement that poetry would have to make a better argument for itself if it is to be allowed into the just city. I will be agreeing with the claim Socrates makes regarding poetry’s inclusion into the city and I will attempt to draw the conclusion that Socrates would support that poets are like painters. Painters and poets appeal to a part of our souls that is not rational, and give representations of hero’s and gods; we are attracted to them because they are magnificently written. However, the poets present a danger.…

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, in order for Glaucon’s and our understanding of this idea to further to the connection between “the effect of education and of the lack of it” (514a), Socrates offers his audience an allegory throughout Book VII of The Republic that has become immensely popular throughout centuries. Unlike before where Socrates would simply discuss his reasoning, The Allegory of the Cave offers a clear visual representation that critically reflects on society’s social and political themes while also making the journey up the “Divided Line” more understandable. Each element discussed in this allegory is symbolic, making it imperative that the audience pays close attention in order to fully comprehend the significance of the depicted scene. He begins by asking the listeners to “imagine human beings living in an underground, cavelike dwelling, with an entrance a long way up,…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays